OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Yes, Elena Kagan will be deciding my Petition for Writ of Certiorari, currently in front of the Supreme Court. So, Will Sonya Sotomayor. Even if I will ask for them to recuse themselves, they will not do it.

Posted on | October 26, 2010 | 16 Comments

  ��. In our Search for the truth…
  �..department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions. I went to Snopes to check this out and they said it was false and there were no such dockets so I �Googled� the Supreme Court, typed in �Obama-Kagan,�  and guess what? Yep you got it. Snopes lied. Everyone of those dockets are there.
So Here is what I wrote Snopes:
      Referencing the article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets: The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Court�s website, typed in Obama- Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to . I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking.
     Thank You, I hope you will be much more truthful in the future.
*************
That being said, I�ll bet you didn’t know this.
Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them.
Folks, this is really ugly.
Chicago Politics; and the beat goes on and on and on…

Once again the US Senate sold us out!
          Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court…. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.

She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn’t it? The American people mean nothing any longer. It’s all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no true right to even be there.
          Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket:
You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!!!
 


If you are not interested in justice or in truth delete this

However,

If you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution�

By all means, please� PASS it ON!

 

            ��There truly is tyranny afoot.�

                                                ~ Dennis Staer ~

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

16 Responses to “Yes, Elena Kagan will be deciding my Petition for Writ of Certiorari, currently in front of the Supreme Court. So, Will Sonya Sotomayor. Even if I will ask for them to recuse themselves, they will not do it.”

  1. Peewee Jermaine
    October 26th, 2010 @ 5:13 pm

    1. It would be self-deferating to try to recuse Justices Kagan and/or Sotomayor. You would need 4 justices to agree to grant cert. whether 7 or 9 were sitting. In this case cert. will be denined unless SCOTUS decides to impose additional sanctions on you for a clearly frivolous petition.

    2. The poster who claims Justice Kagan represented President Obama in eligibility cases is wrong. The cases he or she links are prisoner cases and a “Citizens United” case. They have nothing to do with eligibility. The poster’s reading comprehension is poor.

  2. Jim
    October 26th, 2010 @ 7:56 pm

    Snopes is a joke. It is not a huge research organization with hundreds of employees checking facts and cross checking each others findings to come to a consensus as to whether something is an “internet rumor” or not. Snopes .com is a website run out of the home of 2 people. The husband does the web design. The wife is the “investigator”. She alone decides what is rumor or not.

    Info :

    https://sleepless.blogs.com/george/2003/12/snopescom.html

  3. H.S. Thompson
    October 26th, 2010 @ 9:28 pm

    Why do you censor comments??

    Perhaps you are truly old-school Russian Communist like you accuse others…I will expose you on Rite-wing blogs from here to the Moon…You cannot, cannot repress free speech!!

    HST

  4. chum lee
    October 27th, 2010 @ 4:28 am

    All things aside- you need to convince four Justices to grant cert. That is the basic rule of Cert practice. Five can oppose you – that does not matter since you need only four supporters.

    If they did grant cert, I only see one preserved issue: whether the sanctions were ok or not. All the issues about Obama disapeared when your client left the case.

    You also will not get help from Lakin’s counsel. He just announced that all of Judge Lind’s rulings to date have been correct as a matter of evidentiary law.

  5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 27th, 2010 @ 4:59 am

    here you go

  6. Chum Lee
    October 27th, 2010 @ 5:13 am

    HS – no such thing as free speech on a privately-run blog. Orly can censor, change comments, refuse to print opposing stuff all she wants. Lord knows how many comments she did not post of mine.

  7. RO
    October 27th, 2010 @ 6:24 am

    PeeWee: You are wrong it has been documented by other journalists that Elena Kagan was in fact solicitor general in the eligibility cases and prevent ed them from being heard.

    Jim: you are right about factcheck.org. It is a mom and pop business run by 2 people who get all their information from what is posted on the websites. They are no more reliable than Mickey Mouse. They also have been proven wrong many times.

  8. Phil
    October 27th, 2010 @ 8:52 am

    Orly: Jim’s right. Snopes is a bunch of “goo-goo!” I’ve a lot of discussions with others about this “Ma and Pa Kettle,” “Research ‘R’ Us” “Political Placebo”! To me, they are just like the other 2 con-jobs: Politico and politijab! A whole group of “Halloween Hors d’ oeuvres!”

    Also:for the HST…are you having PMS? A Grand Mall Funk? One too many “heavy flow days?” You are going to do what on a right-wing blog? Chances are you are so retarded that you couldn’t expose yourself!!!

    Orly’s right! She should censor you till you go insane!!! I’d pay to see that!!! LOL!

    And just think how much fun you’ll have someday when Orly finds you, has you arrested and gets you into court, you little “paragon of punk!!!”

    Grrrrrrrrrr…!

    Davey Crockett…

  9. Yulec Dix
    October 27th, 2010 @ 9:35 am

    Orly, can you please help Walter Fitzpatrick III? He could use your expertise….in addition, I heard he likes to go jogging. Maybe you could be one of his athletic supporters. He has a new website: mytallywacker.com…….

  10. chum lee
    October 27th, 2010 @ 10:31 am

    RO can you provide cites and evidence that she prevented the eligibility cases from being heard?

    She has been the SG since shortly after Obama took office*n but SGs do not get involved in district court and most appellate cases.

    Some proof would be nice.

  11. Paul Jackson
    October 27th, 2010 @ 1:38 pm

    RO can not provide any evidence of such because it does not exist. The information posted regarding Justice Kagan being involved in the eligibility cases, much less preventing them from being heard is totally false, and was proven so.

    WND ran the article, and when they were shown it was false even they took it down… without comment, of course, but they removed it.

    If you go to the Supreme Court site and search for Obama you get 26 hits. At the time of that article one got 21 hits.

    If you go to the last one, Berg v Obama is listed. Kagan is not the SG on that case.

    No. 08-570
    Title:
    Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
    v.
    Barack Obama, et al.
    Docketed: October 31, 2008
    Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Case Nos.: (08-4340)
    Rule 11
    Attorneys for Petitioner:
    Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
    Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
    Party name: Philip J. Berg
    Attorneys for Respondents:
    Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
    United States Department of Justice
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
    Washington, DC 20530-0001

    If you move forward to the next eligibility case it is another Berg v Obama case. Justice Kagan is also not the SG on it:

    No. 08A505
    Title:
    Philip J. Berg, Applicant
    v.
    Barack Obama, et al.
    Docketed:
    Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Case Nos.: (08-4340)

    Attorneys for Petitioner:
    Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
    Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
    Party name: Philip J. Berg
    Attorneys for Respondents:
    Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
    United States Department of Justice
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
    Washington, DC 20530-0001

    Moving once again forward, the next eligibility case is yet another Berg case. Justice Kagan, once again, not the SG on the case:

    file type icon Docket for 08A391
    Title: Philip J. Berg, Applicant v. Barack Obama, et al.
    Barack Obama, et al.

    Attorneys for Petitioner:
    Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
    Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
    Party name: Philip J. Berg
    Attorneys for Respondents:
    Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
    United States Department of Justice
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
    Washington, DC 20530-0001

    It’s not that difficult. Anyone can do it.

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/

    NONE of the cases Justice Kagan was Solicitor General on involved any of the eligibility cases regarding Obama… zero, zip, nada.

  12. Carl Manning
    October 27th, 2010 @ 9:46 pm

    I am not a lawyer, but as I see it, both Justices that Barry Soetoro has placed on the SCOTUS – Sotomayor and Kagan – and other federal judgships all around the country and indeed ALL of his political appointees, ambassadorships, and whatnot are completely invalidated by his usurpation of the Executive branch of our government. As such, there is no possible way that Sotomayor or Kagan can possibly rule without prejudice on this case because when Barry goes, they must go as well. It is the equivalent of a Communist kangaroo court!

  13. Carl Manning
    October 27th, 2010 @ 10:37 pm

    It is becoming more and more clear to me everyday that this issue may likely ultimately only be resolved with a Congressional subpoena – yeah, I know – fat chance on that. With the excessive Executive sway over the Judiciary branch of our government, our nation is in more danger than we care to realize with this usurper, this venomous snake in our White House. The Congress must step up to the plate!
    Where are the Statesmen, the men and women of Honor???

    LtC lakin is facing court-martial for following his oath of office to defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC, but where are the soldiers, sailors, Marines, and airmen of honor??? Are they not brothers in arms??? Since when is honor only reserved for the battlefield??? We should have Marines, sailors, airmen, and soldiers joining him in a massive class-action lawsuit over his eligibility!!!

    However, lately, in spite of all this, I am encouraged by Apuzzo’s possibility of eventually getting Quo Warranto in his lawsuit representing GM dealerships that were suddenly run out of business with the government’s socialization of GM. While Quo Warranto may take a while to get, it is worth the wait because it can sink him for sure, proving to the world that this impostor emperor not only has no clothes but doesn’t even have a birth certificate.

    Most assuredly, Barry Soetoro and his Establishment cabal and Establishment media cannot run and hide from the truth forever, and when the truth does eventually come out, all of them will be utterly destroyed forever politically.

  14. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 28th, 2010 @ 4:17 am

    You can forward your thoughts to the Inspector General and Public Integrity Unit of the Department of Justice, as well as your Congressmen and Senators and demand a hearing on the issue

  15. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 28th, 2010 @ 4:20 am

    from what I remember, the dealerships were represented by Leo Donofrio and Steven Pidgeon, not Apuzzo. Their case was thrown out of court.

  16. Paul Jackson
    October 28th, 2010 @ 6:03 am

    Carl: Orly is absolutely correct that the GM (Old Carco, LLC) case was handled by Donfrio and Pidgeon and that they lost the case. It is now on appeal in the Southern District of New York (just filed).

    In addition, contrary to popular belief, they did not file a quo warranto in that case.

Leave a Reply