Will US military site with the people or with the Commander in Chief? Will they shoo their own people? Are there UN soldiers on the US soil to do what American troops will not do?
Posted on | July 11, 2010 | 7 Comments
Chito Papa commented on your status:
“Sure, but elections are not a sure thing. When electronic counting machines are rigged like they are in banana republics, elections may not reflect the will of the people.
For instance, “The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Nevada shows Angle earning 48% support, while Reid, the state’s longtime Democratic senator, picks up 41% of the vote.”
But in spite of the polls, if Reid still wins the election, then you know, something is very wrong.
Make no mistake about it. Potential dictators are already planning how to perpetuate themselves in power. It means rigging elections, intimidating judges, and controlling the military. If 10 to 20 million Americans will march to the White House and demand the usurper to resign, whose side will the military be on? Will they side with the people or will they side with their commander-in-chief? Will the US Army shoot its own people? It will be nice if Gen Mcchrystal will lead the people.
“
Comments
7 Responses to “Will US military site with the people or with the Commander in Chief? Will they shoo their own people? Are there UN soldiers on the US soil to do what American troops will not do?”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

July 11th, 2010 @ 3:55 pm
Yeah, you’re on the list as one of the first to be shot.
July 11th, 2010 @ 4:42 pm
I am happy to report that Nevada is one of the few — if not the only state — that has a paper backup of the electronic vote. I am able to check the paper backup as well as what is on the screen to see if my vote is correct. If it isn’t, I can get help in getting the incorrect vote invalidated and the correct vote validated before I finally cast my vote. The reason Nevada has this system is so that voting is secure.
July 11th, 2010 @ 6:11 pm
Don’t count on McChrystal. He is a Hillary man who voted for Obama. Gen. Vallely, who is demanding Obama resign, is the one to count on. Go to http://www.someonediedformetoday.com and sign their petition. (Not that petitions work!)Several million people marching is more likely to do the trick.
July 12th, 2010 @ 1:06 am
Does it really matter who the military sides with? If the situation devolves into civil war, it’s simply lock and load. As for me, I’d rather die on my feet than live on my knees. Would you rather die an old slave or a young freeman, knowing that your children will be free? What an utter tragedy that we would even need to consider such realities. If it comes to pass, I place all blame upon Congress for not vetting the Communist, the courts for abdicating their Constitutional responsibilities and the military leaders who knowingly served a usurper.
July 12th, 2010 @ 7:54 am
Starting with General Washington officers have always taken their oath of alligence to the United Constitution.
“I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.” (DA
Enlisted personel take their oath to the President and the officers appointed over them. naturally enlisted men will take order from their commanding officers before anyone else.
I do not think anyone in this country has any
cause to fear a military revolt except the usurpers against the Constitution and the military has no desire to rule the country. As
soon as their job is done to protect the Constitution they would return the country to civilian authority.
July 12th, 2010 @ 1:22 pm
This is a great article written by
Sheri Zieve from Post Email…
and it compares the similarities
between the tyranny of King George III
and Obama and his Marxist regime.
Most of us here already have seen these
parallels, but it it won’t hurt to review them again in the light of the Declaration of
Independence.
““““““““““““““““““““““`
https://www.thepostemail.com/2010/07/11/arizona-ceded-to-mexico-and-the-rise-of-the-obama-police-state/
July 12th, 2010 @ 6:01 pm
My fear is that, for the most part, we will NOT be threatened by our own beloved military men & women, but rather by a foreign one, chosen by the enemy in the white house. He has been busy sending our own American troops all over the world. Is this so that they won’t be here when all heck breaks loose? Then what happens to our military when they arrive home from foreign shores? History of other country take-overs has shown that ……. well, it’s in the historical record still, if it hasn’t been expunged already. Look up what happened to the Russian Army who returned home after the first world war at the same time Lenin was consummating his stranglehold on Russia. There sure were a LOT of their military personnel who “went missing.” 🙁