Press Release. Latest motion by Taitz in SSA case: for the same behavior of federal employees as seen in ObamaForgeryGate, the same judge demanded criminal prosecution and $300,000 sanctions against Clinton’s attorney in relation to Hillary’s Health care panel
Posted on | October 14, 2013 | 22 Comments
Press release
Law Offices of Dr. Orly Taitz
Taitz filed with the DC for the District of Columbia a Motion for Reconsideration attached herein. It shows vividly that employees of the federal government are engaged in fraud, perjury and obstruction of Justice. In 1997 for similar behavior as is exhibited in the case at hand, Royce C. Lamberth, Federal Judge, who is presiding in this case, sanctioned Clinton’s attorney $300,000 and demanded a special prosecutor to be appointed by then Attorney General Janet Reno and demanded a criminal prosecution by then U.S. Attorney for the district of Columbia. Taitz is demanding consistency from Judge Lamberth and demanding the same measures against Dawn Wiggins, deputy chief Freedom of Information officer for the Social security administration who defrauded the court and is complicit in a RICO to cover up Obama’s use of a stolen CT Social security number 042-68-4425 of Harry Bounel and Obama’s use of fabricated IDs.
Due to cyberattacks on OrlyTaitzESQ.com, (believed to be coming from Obama regime) PDF and jpg files posted by Taitz on Saturday and today, on Monday, 10.14, 2013, are not seen by the public. She is working with her hosting company, Network Solutions, on solving this problem.
Google searches are, also, being manipulated and Obama regime is using Google to place most outrageous defamation of Taitz character, outrageous pornographic paintings by a disturbed painter, who claims to be hired by George Soros, in order to demean and dehumanize her, even though Taitz is a licensed doctor and attorney and a mother of 3.
It is sad that Google founder Sergei Brin, a Jewish immigrant from the Soviet Union, allows his company to be used as a tool in such despicable Obama-NAZI attacks on a civil rights attorney and freedom fighter Orly Taitz.
While a bomb was found at LAX yesterday, Taitz, who flew through LAX , was not affected.
Yesterday Taitz took part in the rally at the World War 2 memorial. at the picture below attorney Taitz is talking to a 96 year old female veteran who stormed NAZI barricades and stormed Obama barricades at the World War 2 memorial. the veteran is holding a ripped Obama -sign “Closed, government shutdown, do not enter”. At the memorial taitz discussed Obama’s use of fabricated IDs with Senator Roberts of KS, who promissed to discuss this issue with members of the Senate Judiciary committee Senator Orin Hatch of Utah and Senator chuck Grassley of IA.
Taitz was interviewed at the event by Jovien Wei, producer of “Kelly file” with Meghan Kelly from FOX. Kelly is an attorney, she knows that not covering this matter amounts to Misprision of multiple serious felonies. Members of the public are asked to contact Meghan Kelly and demand that she air the interview given by Attorney Taitz to her producer. as a reminder, Kelly’s mentor, Bill O’Reilly shelved one hour interview that Taitz gave to his producer and O’Reilly attacked Taitz on his program in his editorial for speaking up the truth about Obama’s use of fabricated IDs . Taitz was also interviewed by CNN, Washington times, Talking Points Memo and other news networks and outlets. Taitz gave an in depth interview to CINA, largest news agency of China.
Attorney Orly Taitz with Senator Roberts
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, orly.taitz@gmail.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE § Case 11-cv-402
Plaintiff, § Hon Judge Lamberth
§Chief Judge Presiding
v. §
§
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the §
Social Security Administration, §
§
§
§
Respondent §
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF 10.09.2013 ORDER, AS THE ORDER WAS ISSUED IN ERROR
ARGUMENT
In June 2013 Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration under Statute 60B2,6.
The court made an error of fact and stated that the motion had to be filed within a year from the final judgment. The court did not notice that the motion was filed under both clauses 2 and 6 of Statute 60Bb. The court considered only 60 B2, which is supposed to be filed within 1 year, however the court did not consider 60B6 part of the motion, which does not have any time limitation.
RULE 60. RELIEF FROM A JUDGMENT OR ORDER
(a) Corrections Based on Clerical Mistakes; Oversights and Omissions. The court may correct a clerical mistake or a mistake arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part of the record. The court may do so on motion or on its own, with or without notice. But after an appeal has been docketed in the appellate court and while it is pending, such a mistake may be corrected only with the appellate court’s leave.
(b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:
(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;
(2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);
(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;
(4) the judgment is void;
(5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or
(6) ANY OTHER REASON THAT JUSTIFIES RELIEF.
(c) Timing and Effect of the Motion.
(1) Timing. A motion under Rule 60(b) must be made within a reasonable time—and for reasons (1), (2), and (3) no more than a year after the entry of the judgment or order or the date of the proceeding.
Motion for Reconsideration under 60B6 can be filed at any time, there is no time limitation, only 60B 1,2, 3 have a year limitation. 60B6 Motion for reconsideration can be filed 10 years from the final order or a 100 years after the final order, as long as it serves justice, as long as it is “inequitable to permit a judgment to stand.” FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b); Ackerman v. United States, 340 U.S. 193, 202 (1950) (Black, J., dissenting). The case at hand deals with the fact that Barack Obama is occupying the position of the U.S. President by fraud and using fabricated IDs as a basis of his identity and basis of his legitimacy for the U.S. Presidency. Extraordinary circumstance justifies FRCP 60B6 Ackermann v. United
States, 340 U.S. 193, 71 S.Ct. 209, 95 L.Ed. 207 (1950). Usurpation of the U.S. Presidency represents an extraordinary circumstance which justifies granting a Motion for Reconsideration under FRCP 60B6. As a matter of fact, this is the most extraordinary circumstance in the history of this nation. Any time evidence surfaces, which can assist the court in adjudication of the matter on the merits and in stopping the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency, it has to be considered, as it serves Justice. Not considering such evidence not only will not serve justice, but would constitute treason against the United States of America. Plaintiff hopes that this court will not commit treason against the United States of America by covering up the usurpation of the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief by Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah (Hereinafter “Obama”) with the aid of fabricated IDs and, in the case at hand, by using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 of Harrison(Harry) J. Bounel, born in 1890.
In Link v. Wabash Railroad Co 370 U.S. 626 (1962)., the plaintiff challenged the court’s 41(b) sua sponte motion. The Court recognized that when a court exercises its inherent power under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, it may do so without informing the party adversely affected by such a motion and not be in derogation of the due process clause. [T]he availability of a corrective remedy such as is provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)—which authorizes the reopening of cases in which final orders have been inadvisedly [sic] entered—renders the lack of prior notice of less consequence. Petitioner never sought to avail himself of the escape hatch provided by Rule 60(b).
Additionally, some courts have held that Rule 60(b) motions apply in habeas
corpus proceedings, liberating the challenging party from the strictures of the
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.11 Rule 60(b), therefore, has very powerful strategic and substantive implications, albeit in limited
circumstances.
The Motion for Reconsideration at hand revolves around the Connecticut Social Security number of Harry Bounel, which was fraudulently used by Barack Obama in his tax returns. Obama posted his 2009 tax returns, did not flatten the PDF file and full Social Security number that he is using became easily available to the whole nation. This number failed both E-Verify and SSNVS. Plaintiff provided this court with evidence that the original owner of the SSN xxx-xx-4425, which is currently being use by Obama, was born in 1890. This information came from sworn affidavits of licensed investigators Susan Daniels and Neil Sankey. This court originally denied the appeal seeking the release of SS-5, application for the Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 which was originally issued to the individual born in 1890 and later fraudulently used by Barack Obama.
In 2013 Taitz received a sworn affidavit of an investigator Albert Hendershot, who authenticated a report by Merlyns information systems, showing that SSN xxx-xx-4425 is listed in Merlyns information systems as one being used by Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel and Barack Obama. In 2011 U.S. Census Bureau released 1940 census results which showed that there is only one Harry Bounel, who resided in 1940 in Bronx NY and who was 50 years old at a time, which means that he was born in 1890, 123 years ago.
Additionally, Taitz provided this court with SSA(Social Security administration ) “120 year rule”, which states that individuals who were born 120 years ago or earlier, are considered to be extremely aged individuals and the SSA is obligated to release their SS-5 even without a death certificate. Since only two individuals used this SSN, Obama and Bounel, and SSNVS and E-Verify show that the number was not issued to Obama, by process of elimination it is clear that it was issued to Bounel, who was born 123 years ago and SSA wrongfully denied FOIA request by Taitz for his SS-5, as he is an extremely aged individual and the SS-5 has to be released, consideration of privacy cannot be used.
Second extraordinary circumstance, which justifies granting this Motion for Reconsideration under 60B6, over a year after the final judgment, is Fraud, Obstruction of Justice, Perjury and possibly Treason committed by Dawn Wiggins, Deputy Chief FOIA officer for Social Security administration, whose sworn testimony the defense used as a basis for their motion to dismiss. While Taitz did not have an Affidavit from Albert Hendershot until 2013, did not have the name of Bounel, did not have his age and did not know that SSA was obligated to release his SS-5 under the “120 year rule”, Wiggins had all of this information in 2011 when the case was filed and when she fraudulently claimed that the SS-5 for xxx-xx-4425 cannot be released due to consideration of privacy . She had in front of her Bounel’s SS-5 for xxx-xx-4425, she knew in 2011 that Bounel was born in 1890, she knew of SSA 120 year rule and she knew that she had no right to use the excuse of privacy in denying the production of SS-5. Wiggins acted with malice, in her zeal to cover up crime committed by Obama, she defrauded this honorable court, committed perjury, engaged in obstruction of justice and possibly treason.
Taitz would like to remind Honorable Judge Lamberth that in and around December , 1994, he sanctioned White House aide Ira Magaziner, who worked for President Clinton and committed fraud in his sworn affidavit submitted to Judge Lamberth and ordered to pay sanctions of nearly $300,000 because of the White House and Justice Department’s “dishonest” and “reprehensible” conduct in failing to reveal to the court key information about the health-care-reform task force headed by first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. APPS, et al. v. Clinton, 813 F. Supp. (D.D.C. 1993)
U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth said the government should pay $285,864 for the conduct of its lawyers in handling a lawsuit filed by a doctors group while the first lady was working on health-care reform during President Clinton’s first term.
“It is clear that the decisions here were made at the highest levels of government, and the government itself is – and should be – accountable when its officials run amok,” id. Further, Your Honor referred this case to Attorney General Janet Reno seeking a special prosecutor and to Eric Holder, who was at a time U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, to seek criminal prosecution. Holder refused to prosecute Magaziner. Ironically, now, some 16 years later, we see another U.S. President, his aides and possibly the same Eric Holder defrauding the nation and courts not only in relation to yet another health care reform, but in relation to the very identity, legitimacy and citizenship of the putative President.
Fraud Committed by Wiggins is much more egregious, as she was engaged in a de facto RICO, in a scheme to defraud the court and the nation as a whole and to cover up Obama’s use of a stolen Social Security number and his use of fabricated IDs.
Due to flagrant error this court should reconsider and grant the Motion for Reconsideration.
Public concern not only warrants consideration, it dictates an urgent, immediate reconsideration as National Security is at stake and a 16 trillion U.S. economy is at stake.
Further, this court did not grant requested Judicial Notice, stating that it needs notarized documents for such judicial notice. However, yet again, due to the fact that Plaintiff is bringing forward a complaint dealing with fraud committed by an individual sitting in the White House, numerous agencies of the U.S. government are refusing to cooperate, often documents are disappearing or being falsified. The only way to obtain a requested certified copy, is for it to be requested by the court itself.
As such, Plaintiff is requesting this court to sign attached proposed orders directing following agencies and officials of the U.S. Government to certify attached documents:
1. Order/ subpoena to John H. Thompson, Director of the U.S. Census, to furnish within ten days of receipt of this order, a certified copy of the attached page of the U.S. Census, Population schedule, SD 24, ED No 3-1199, Sheet No-13B, Enumerated April 16, 1940, State-New York, County- the Bronx, New York City, Ward of the city 7A-D showing Harry Bounel residing in Bronx, NY and being 50 years old in 1940.
2. Order to Denis McDonough, White House Chief of Staff , to provide within ten days from the receipt of this order a certified copy of the electronic computer file of the attached Form 709, from Barack Obama’s 2009 tax return, in the exact form as it was posted on Whitehouse.gov on April 15, 2010 at 11:11:29 prior to alteration of the file which was done the same day, April 15, 2010 at 6:17:52PM
3. Order to the Commissioner of Social Security Administration to provide certification of 2010 “120 year rule”, which was published by the Chief FOIA officer of the SSA in 2011.
4. Order to the Commissioner of Social Security to provide a certified copy of SSNVS report attached herein, which shows that Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which was used by Obama in his tax returns and made public by posting on WhiteHouse.gov on April 15, 2010 at 11:15:29 AM, was never assigned by the SSA to Barack Obama.
Respectfully submitted,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
10.11.2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE § Case 11-cv-402
Plaintiff, § Hon Judge Lamberth
§Chief Judge Presiding
v. §
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the §
Social Security Administration, §
Respondent §
Proposed order
Commissioner of Social Security Administration is ordered to provide this court within ten days of the receipt of this order with a certified copy of the attached 2011 report of the Chief FOIA officer of the social security administration relating to “120 year rule”.
______________________________________________________________
Signed
Royce C. Lamberth USDC Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE § Case 11-cv-402
Plaintiff, § Hon Judge Lamberth
§Chief Judge Presiding
v. §
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the §
Social Security Administration, §
Respondent §
Proposed order
Commissioner of Social Security Administration is ordered to provide this court within ten days of the receipt of this order with a certified copy of the attached SSNVS report
______________________________________________________________
Signed
Royce C. Lamberth USDC Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE § Case 11-cv-402
Plaintiff, § Hon Judge Lamberth
§Chief Judge Presiding
v. §
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the §
Social Security Administration, §
Respondent §
Proposed order
John H. Thompson, Director of the U.S. Census Bureau is ordered herein to provide within 10 days from receipt of this order a certified copy of the attached page of the 1940 U.S. Census: Population schedule, SD 24, ED No 3-1199, Sheet No-13B, Enumerated April 16, 1940, State-New York, County- the Bronx, New York City, Ward of the city 7A-D showing Harry Bounel residing in Bronx, NY and being 50 years old in 1940.
______________________________________________________________
Signed
Royce C. Lamberth USDC Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE § Case 11-cv-402
Plaintiff, § Hon Judge Lamberth
§Chief Judge Presiding
v. §
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the §
Social Security Administration, §
Respondent § Proposed order
Denis McDonough, White House Chief of Staff is ordered to provide within ten days from the receipt of this order a certified copy of the electronic computer file of the attached Form 709, from Barack Obama’s 2009 tax return, in the exact form as it was posted on Whitehouse.gov on April 15, 2010 at 11:11:29 prior to alteration of the file which was done the same day, April 15, 2010 at 6:17:52PM
_____________________________________________________________
Signed
Royce C. Lamberth USDC Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE § Case 11-cv-402
Plaintiff, § Hon Judge Lamberth
§Chief Judge Presiding
v. §
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the §
Social Security Administration, §
Respondent § Proposed order
Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration filed on June 7,2013 and docketed on 06.13.2013 as Document #45 is GRANTED
_____________________________________________________________
Signed
Royce C. Lamberth USDC Judge
Obama’s mouthpiece Democratic Underground posted picture of attorney Taitz discussing with a reporter Obama’s failed SSNVS, which shows Obama using a stolen SSN. Democratic Underground posted a sign claiming Taitz is a racist. Since when speaking up the truth about a stolen Social Security number makes one a racist?
Guess Who Else Showed Up at the “March” Today?..
Imani ABL @AngryBlackLady oh dear. RT @Gus_802: Guess who else showed up at the “Million” Veterans March? Orly Taitz. #birthers
1:53 PM – 13 Oct 2013
21 Retweets 1 favorite Reply
Comments
22 Responses to “Press Release. Latest motion by Taitz in SSA case: for the same behavior of federal employees as seen in ObamaForgeryGate, the same judge demanded criminal prosecution and $300,000 sanctions against Clinton’s attorney in relation to Hillary’s Health care panel”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
October 14th, 2013 @ 8:30 am
Looting at WalMart https://www.naturalnews.com/042479_EBT_cards_Walmart_looting.html
October 14th, 2013 @ 8:48 am
Dr. Taitz, Ted Cruz and Mike Lee are beginning impeachment hearings in The House Of Representatives. I so WISH they will get Obama out of office.
https://www.codewit.com/north-america/13034-house-republicans-schedule-obama-impeachment-hearings
October 14th, 2013 @ 8:59 am
Since when does speaking “the truth” mean racism?
When it’s you, you disingenuous liar. Going to white supremacist meetings to gain supporters for your (failed) “cause”makes you a racist, dear.
Actions speak louder than words.
Look in the mirror, dear.
October 14th, 2013 @ 9:09 am
Orly, considering this most extraordinary circumstance with a constitutionally-ineligible illegal alien controlling our military forces and national security, is there any reason the following cannot authorize sua sponte action by Alabama’s supreme court in the eligiblity case currently before it?
“Any time evidence surfaces which can assist the court in adjudication of the matter on the merits and in stopping the usurpation of the U.S. presidency, it must be considered, as it serves justice. Not considering such evidence not only will not serve justice, but would constitute treason against the United States of America. Plaintiff hopes that this court will not commit treason against the United States of America by covering up the usurpation of the position of the U.S. president and commander in chief by Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah (Hereinafter “Obama”) with the aid of fabricated IDs and, in the case at hand, by using a stolen Connecticut social security number xxx-xx-4425 of Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel, born in 1890.”
Surely, Obama’s spending millions of public and private dollars to prevent the forensic examination of the requested documents tells judge Royce C. Lamberth that the obots are trying to deceive and exploit his court, because if they had nothing to hide, it would much easier for Obama to simply release the requested records and end all the speculation.
“The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.” – Barack Obama
(I tried to post this earlier, but apparently failed.)
October 14th, 2013 @ 10:08 am
American patriots are not white supremacists and not racist. Speaking the truth about the charlatan in the wH does not make it racist.
Go back to your Obama zombies, Janet Jaxon, or whatever your name is
October 14th, 2013 @ 10:11 am
We can only HOPE Obama is ousted from Office through impeachment, the second term curse and/or Dr. Taitz’s steadfast determination to keep filing court suits until SOMEBODY sees we are in the midst of a terrifying dictatorship.
October 14th, 2013 @ 10:14 am
this is a hoax
October 14th, 2013 @ 10:41 am
Orly: could that poster Janet Jaxon be someone who is trying to make us believe that this post was done by Janet (Jackson)???
Say that posters name fast…it sure sounds like it?! And yes, you are right, Orly, truckers and veterans are NOT racists!
This Janet poster is assuming they are, if they’re white! Well, (dear) we all know that there are some blacks that are racists and they seem proud of it!
October 14th, 2013 @ 10:53 am
REALLY!!
Exasperation between the judicial and legislative branches is seeping into court orders as the shutdown moves into its third week, Politico reports.
For example, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington, D.C., rejected a plea by House Republicans to ignore the shutdown and proceed with a case against Attorney General Eric Holder for his refusal to turn over some information on the Fast and Furious gun-tracking operation to Congress.
“While the vast majority of litigants who now must endure a delay in the progress of their matters do so due to circumstances beyond their control, that cannot be said of the House of Representatives, which has played a role in the shutdown that prompted the stay motion,” Jackson wrote.
Chief Judge Richard Roberts, who also sits on the federal bench in the District of Columbia, told Politico that sequestration cuts coupled with the recent shutdown have financially crippled the system.
“Court budgets have essentially been slashed to the bone, with us losing, nationwide, thousands of judicial employees performing very important tasks . . . We’re being told to furlough where we’re already cut to the bone,” Roberts said.
Under sequestration, $350 million was cut from the judiciary’s budget overall, costing nearly 2,700 jobs, a 20 percent reduction for drug testing and electronic monitoring. The sequestration cuts were already being blamed for numerous delays in criminal and civil cases. In addition, federal attorneys who defend the government in cases have to take 15-day unpaid furloughs this year to sequestration caps.
Judge Julia Gibbons of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, who heads the judiciary’s budget committee, did not endorse the language Kopf used to express his anger, but she did validate his argument that things are a mess in Washington.
“Judges generally try not to use intemperate language, but certainly, we are very, very, very concerned about the judiciary’s future,” Gibbons said.
“There is a grave, grave concern and, yes, people are really, really, really worried,” Gibbons added.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/judge-hell-shutdown-congress/2013/10/14/id/530899#ixzz2hiwhLhzL
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
October 14th, 2013 @ 11:11 am
Not only are you a racist but you should also be arrested for sedition and hung by your neck until you are dead.
October 14th, 2013 @ 11:45 am
Rascal Flatts, you probably are Obama using yet another fake name. Dr. Taitz is trying to help us, so go away. You are not wanted here.
October 14th, 2013 @ 11:57 am
poster #10: Such a vile attack on the person, Dr Taitz, who is actually trying to SAVE AMERICA, you insignificant flatulent!!!
October 14th, 2013 @ 12:07 pm
Orly: some great photos again. You and a vet…
great shot! That lucky guy!! 🙂
October 14th, 2013 @ 2:30 pm
China calls for NEW WORLD ORDER! https://americankabuki.blogspot.co.nz/2013/10/zerohedge-chinas-official-press-agency.html
October 14th, 2013 @ 4:01 pm
Dr. Taitz, you look great, so glad you’re feeling better. Tomorrow’s rally should be another huge success: https://www.infowars.com/vets-set-to-launch-second-d-c-protest/
God Bless the 5.5 million members of the Military Coalition (TMC) being represented.
May God continue to Bless Dr. Taitz and her entire family. We owe her a debt of gratitude for her relentless work in exposing the fraud residing in OUR WHITE HOUSE.
October 14th, 2013 @ 4:14 pm
You have to admit, that these little
whiners are hilarious.
It isn’t even a logical parallel,
to use the over-done term ‘racist’
when discussing or promoting
patriotism and justice in our
country.
I may have a weird sense of humor,
having been a teacher of all levels
in the education realm, where kids
acted out with total ignorance
concerning their rebellious behaviour.
They had no idea what they were
rebelling against, in reality,
and it was all a mythological
assumption, using terminology that
had no significance according to the
situation at hand.
In other words, Janet and Rascal
along with the other cretins
are not functioning well in our
contemporary society and have no
perception regarding the matters
at hand.
Janet, dear, and Rascal, darling,
Racism is not the act of protecting
our Constitution from foreign
entities attempting to undermine
its meaning for this country and its
citizens.
Racism is not speaking to citizens
who are of all shades from black to
yellow to brown to white, and explaining
the infiltration of cultures and persons
who want to destroy America.
You apparently, Janet, dear, and
Rascal, darling, do not have all your
information in an organized file,
so please spend more time doing
a bit of research on what is happening
all around you, while you sit and
twiddle your thumbs, as you contemplate
your navels.
You really are comical.
October 14th, 2013 @ 4:48 pm
Uh oh – Bill O’Reilly’s segment tonight gets into a discussion tonight on Ted Cruz’s eligibility to run for President and the discussion is DEAD WRONG. It’ the segment with Juan Williams and Mary Katharine Ham.
You need to watch this! We all need to address this and let them know that their interpretation of who is eligible is WRONG!!!
October 15th, 2013 @ 8:07 am
Mike Lee is to Ted Cruz’s right in the photo of Ted and Sarah Palin.
October 15th, 2013 @ 8:20 am
I know, I met him
October 15th, 2013 @ 10:56 am
Did Ted or Mike tell you they think you’re doing a great job in trying to oust The Usurper?
October 15th, 2013 @ 11:41 am
Oh, Elizabeth: you are so much fun! I loved your post and it’s true…Wink’em, blink’em, and nod really have a time of functioning with NORMALCY!
Poor babies…and Davey says to say; his beard just grew out again!!! LOLOL! Just kidding!!! We enjoy reading your posts! 🙂
October 15th, 2013 @ 11:49 am
Also, Orly, with all the attendance from the truckers, bikers, and the vets, it says one BIG thing: America is, indeed, aware of you and your astounding work to SAVE America! This should now put to rest that notion that not many people know what’s going on!
P.S. GO DODGERS!!!