Upcoming interview
Posted on | August 31, 2009 | 17 Comments
hi Dr Taitz,
I’m a reporter with the UK Guardian, and I’m based in New York. I’ve been following the birther movement, and your role as a leader within it, with great interest. i’d like to write in more depth about the birthers, and i wondered whether you are ever in new york and available to meet me for interview. would you let me know please. i’d be most grateful
all best
Ed Pilkington
—
Ed Pilkington
New York bureau chief
The Guardian
www.guardian.co.uk
Comments
17 Responses to “Upcoming interview”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
August 31st, 2009 @ 8:40 pm
FIRST OF ALL if you are asking for an interview the last thing you should fo is INSULT the peole you want to interview. This is not a “birther movement” this is the ELIGIBILTY CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE.
August 31st, 2009 @ 9:57 pm
we are NOT birthers. we ARE however,ARTICLE ll PATRIOTS
September 1st, 2009 @ 9:36 am
No , birthers here .
September 1st, 2009 @ 10:48 am
Mr. Ed Pilkington
A little advice:
If you are asking someone to do an interview the last thing you should do is INSULT them with a term MADE up to be demeaning by Obama and his Brownshirts and their Bedmate Media. We are not Birthers nor tea baggers. We are Constitutionalists for TRUTH and Transparency from the INSURGENCY PRESIDENCY who may have used FRAUD and FROGERY to USURP the Presidency.
As far as we know we have a British President that answers to the Queen of England in total violation of Article II Section 1 of the Constitution.
You guys in the Bedmate Media instead of name calling and labellign do your JOB and INVESTIGATE like ethical journalist are supposed to do.
Expose the British INSURGENCY PRESIDENCY.
September 1st, 2009 @ 11:00 am
Orly,
Don’t trust these guys! Read this article and tell me they report the facts.
https://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/02/obama-birthers-us-presidency
Here’s an excerpt:
“The aim here is not prove these people wrong. That has been achieved several times over. For them to be right, Obama would have had to persuade the state of Hawaii to collude in forging a birth certificate that has been verified by its Republican governor and director of health as well as the nonpartisan factcheck.org. Moreover, his mother would have had to have the foresight to place birth announcements claiming he was born in the US in both the Honolulu Advertiser and the Hawaii Star Bulletin, 48 years ago, in anticipation of a future presidential run – otherwise, why bother? When you think of the time and effort that must have gone into this cover-up, Obama’s election must go down as the most elaborate affirmative-action sting in US history.”
Still think they will bother to report the facts?
September 1st, 2009 @ 11:45 am
Guardian readers are well known for being intelectual liberal/socialists, if that’s not a contradiction in terms. I’m sure that they are currently delighted that the son of a British Kenyan is ‘ruling’ over The USA. They HATE American exceptionalism and American power. The Guardian reporter knows that they DO NOT want to be told that their man in The White House is actually, under The Constitution of the USA, a USURPER.
September 1st, 2009 @ 11:46 am
intellectual
September 1st, 2009 @ 12:34 pm
God Bless YOU! DR. Orly! 🙂 YOU are a wonderful patriot! 🙂 Prayers for strength for YOU! 🙂
September 1st, 2009 @ 2:41 pm
“Article II Patriots” – finally, a good brand-able name.
I’ve been calling us “Americans with common sense,” but it’s not that catchy.
September 1st, 2009 @ 3:33 pm
Orly, I am a UK citizen, the Guardian is a very liberal newspaper. The journalists who work there cannot even conceive of the possibility that Barack Obama cannot walk on water let alone agree with any criticism of their secular saint, it is just not in their DNA.
I think it highly likely that this would be an interview in which you are led on to drop your guard and encouraged to speculate. Then they will write an acticle that will treat you in the same method that a butterfly collector applies to his captives.
You will be painted as a “kook” and a “freak,” with any speculative thing or suspicion you may have voiced about Obama used as fuel. The thing is, the journalists concerned will actually believe the distortion they have created. The TV version of Obama is all pervasive in the UK, the media here do not question it.
They will not do any real investigation.
If you win your court case with Judge O’Carter, I think the only paper you could trust to attempt a write-up in the UK is the Daily Telegraph.
The Telegraph exposed a expenses scandal here in the UK involving Members of Parliament of *both* parties, and published all the evidence including that which damaged the Conservative party [normally the Telegraph supports the conservatives] and the Governing Labour party.
The Telegraph is not owned by Rupert Murdoch, and is I believe against all corruption. Give them hard evidence and a court victory, and I believe they will produce a fair interview and report.
September 1st, 2009 @ 5:05 pm
What’s the status on CPT Rhodes?
Did she refuse to report for deployment?
September 1st, 2009 @ 6:45 pm
Birthers? Ofgs!
September 1st, 2009 @ 9:32 pm
Who are the “birthers”?
A poll finds that the quarter of Americans who think the US president was born outside the US are mostly white male conservatives
Dear Orly,
Here is a fine Example of how the Guardian addresses the Eligibility issue. I AGREE… DON’T DO THEIR INTERVIEW, They will NOT help the cause at all.
Take care of yourself!
~Jill~
Daniel Nasaw Posted by Daniel Nasaw Wednesday 19 August 2009 22.14 BST guardian.co.uk
Who are the “birthers” — the Americans who believe in the face of all available evidence that President Barack Obama was not born in the US and is therefore not eligible for the presidency?
A poll by Public Policy Polling reveals they’re overwhelmingly white, conservative and male.
The poll found that nearly a quarter of Americans believe Obama was born outside the US, while 62 percent of Americans understand Obama is a native-born American and 14 percent are not sure.
Who are those 14 percent?
-62% are Republicans, 20% are Democrats, and 18% are independents
-57% are conservatives, 33% are moderates, and 9% are liberals
-56% are men, 44% are women
-86% are white, 7% are Hispanic, 4% are black, and 3% are other races
The poll does not reveal which brand of tinfoil the birthers prefer for their hats.
September 1st, 2009 @ 11:20 pm
The Guardian is a politically correct, loony-lefty tabloid who has done much harm to ruin England with the appeasment of the conniving, trojan-horse islamic hoards and the dhimmification of the English population, via selective and mis-leading reporting.
I wouldn’t give the Guardian the time of day.
Orly, if you were to do the interview, ask the journo to report the FACTS about Obama, rather than report on the ‘birthers’ movement.
September 2nd, 2009 @ 3:31 am
The correct term is “Constitutionalists” since this issue is all about the Constitution. That’s our new name!
September 3rd, 2009 @ 3:50 am
We are Article II Patriots, and also Constitutionalists. They are Forgers, so please refer to them as Forgers often and loudly.
Orly, looks like the consensus is for you to tell the Guardian to take a hike, and give the fact that Ed Pilkington referred to the cause as “birthers” as your reason for declining. Tell him that shows his malicious intent.
September 3rd, 2009 @ 3:26 pm
Orly,
The worst newspaper in the UK is The Independent. If they ever call you then I strongly advise you to immediately put the phone down. Otherwise they will invent damaging lies about you and the cause. Their love for Obama and their vitriolic hatred of America is limitless. The Guardian is not quite as bad as that – but is still a propaganda sheet for Obama. The Telegraph is, however, a serious newspaper and will report you fairly and accurately.