OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

The beauty of the system of checks and balances is holding all branches accountable, including the judiciary

Posted on | February 14, 2017 | 7 Comments

The beauty of the system of checks and balances is holding all branches accountable, including the judiciary

By Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

The US constitution gave us a great system of checks and balances. For example, the president can veto a bill, the congress can override the veto by the 2/3 of the vote. Here we have a feedback, a system of checks and balances.

The judiciary  can find a law or an executive order unconstitutional, so in this case the judiciary provides a check over the congress and the executive branch.

The question arises, how is the judiciary kept accountable?How do the president, the congress and the people hold the judiciary accountable? Where is the system of checks and balances to stop lawless and corrupt judges?

Well, there are several options.

  1. The people have power to throw out of office corrupt and lawless state judges by voting for new judges to replace them
  2. Because federal judges are appointed for life, the people cannot throw them out of office during an election, however there are other options, among them impeachment. The US  congress can impeach and remove from office corrupt and lawless federal judges, who violate their oath of office to defend the US constitution. During the impeachment the House of Representatives impeaches a judges by a simple majority. Impeachment is similar to indictment. Then the case goes to the Senate, which can remove the judge out of office by 2/3rds. This is a system of checks and balances where the US congress can hold the judiciary accountable. A number of federal judges were removed from the bench by the congress. Among them judge Walter Nixon, chief judge of the Southern District of Mississippi.
  3. The executive branch, meaning the office of the US President can, hold corrupt and lawless judges accountable by filing criminal judges for the crime of violation of their oath of office to defend the constitution
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

7 Responses to “The beauty of the system of checks and balances is holding all branches accountable, including the judiciary”

  1. Veritas
    February 14th, 2017 @ 8:32 am

    An attempt to rectify injustice from the Judiciary:
    _______

    HOW CAN ELIGIBILITY BE BASED ON A FORGERY?

    by Sharon Rondeau

    https://www.thepostemail.com/2017/02/14/lakin-petition-tops-5000-signatures/

    (Feb. 14, 2017) — A petition to pardon former Lt. Col. Terry Lakin for asking for proof that Barack Hussein Obama was eligible to serve as president and commander-in-chief has surpassed 5,000 signatures.

  2. Extirpates
    February 14th, 2017 @ 8:43 am

    Including the leftist 9th Circus.

  3. T.F. Bow
    February 14th, 2017 @ 10:37 am

    If judges can rule an executive order is unconstitutional, how does that violate this oath: “I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”?

  4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 14th, 2017 @ 10:58 am

    if it is indeed constitutional and the judges are corrupt globalists, who are lying, then they are liable

  5. Darcy
    February 14th, 2017 @ 11:10 am

    I am not holding my breath for any judicial impeachments. It’s easier to re-write the EO.

  6. USA PATRIOT
    February 14th, 2017 @ 11:56 am

    One thing I don’t understand:

    Why are SC judges confirmed for (life)?

    Why can’t the President just fire them?

    This is something a Constitutional Attorney should check into and see if there is a loop hole for Trump to solve the problem?!

  7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 14th, 2017 @ 12:35 pm

    even if it is re-written, lawless judges will stay it

Leave a Reply