OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


SIDNEY POWELL Drops a BOMB on Mark Levin Show: We Have Witness Who Was at Creation of Smartmatic System – Used to Change Election Results (VIDEO)

Posted on | November 16, 2020 | 2 Comments

SIDNEY POWELL Drops a BOMB on Mark Levin Show: We Have Witness Who Was at Creation of Smartmatic System – Used to Change Election Results (VIDEO)

Comments

2 Responses to “SIDNEY POWELL Drops a BOMB on Mark Levin Show: We Have Witness Who Was at Creation of Smartmatic System – Used to Change Election Results (VIDEO)”

  1. Alexander Gofen
    November 17th, 2020 @ 3:02 pm

    I have been a computer programmer during all my life. There exists a fundamental problem of proving the validity of any software against the specifications and tasks it supposedly must fulfill. To prove validity of the software mathematically – its an ultimate goal, a dream, which cannot be realized practically for complicate software with thousands lines of source code.

    And I am speaking about the software created in a GOOD FAITH, so that the process of proving its validity must consider only UNINTENDED errors and glitches in the code in high level programming language.

    However if we suspect an INTENTIONAL sabotage in the complicate code (and in a low level routines down to hardware circuits), then it is impossible to be 100% sure even for a limited number of experts trying to detect it (IN GOOD FAITH). And it means that courts and larger public can never inspect it and elaborate their judgement on their own, but always rely on some experts (which ultimately cannot be sure too, as I explained, never mind their honesty).

    A decision to rely on software in voting machines was a SABOTAGE IN ITSELF because in tasks so critical as election, the mechanization and automation must be limited to simple sensors and electronic counters. Nothing else.

    And indeed, no human factor in the process of acquisition of ballots, no middle man between the voter and the storage box of ballots (meaning no mail-in ballots in principle)!

  2. Davey Crockett
    November 18th, 2020 @ 8:38 pm

    Well, I didn’t understand the post above me here but all it takes is one idea to keep the idea very clear…

    And it really only takes the common sense to see that they (by-(den) is doing one thing for sure…

    They’re doing the “bringing in more boxes as time goes on…

    And that is not right!

    We need to take the boxes and stop the counting!

    This has been done long enough!

    The counting has been going on for far-far too long already!

    So …Say good-by-(den) and sorry you lose the election!

    And the Trumper has won the damned victory!

    It’s all that simple!

    So let’s get on with life!

    And I had a number in my head several weeks ago about (406)…so that has to be the electoral college!

    Good luck, Mr President, and let’s go-go-go!

Leave a Reply