OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Second request for a position on Amicus Curiae. Defense does not oppose. Update: US Department of Justice does not oppose

Posted on | July 27, 2025 | 2 Comments

Second request for a position on Amicus Curiae. Defense does not oppose
kevin.muench@usdoj.gov,
Orly Taitz <orly.taitz@gmail.com>,
bilal.essayli@usdoj.gov,
michael.gates@usdoj.gov,
david.harris@usdoj.gov,
katherine.hikida@usdoj.gov,
harmeet.dhillon@usdoj.gov
This is a second request for a position on proposed Amicus Curiae in US v Page 8:25-cv-01370 before David O. Carter.
Proposed Amicus contains information pertinent to the case. The defendant does not oppose the Amicus and does not have a position.
Attached brief, Declaration of Orly Taitz, Affidavit of a computer expert David Yun, showing fraud in California elections, and a 148 page file with evidence of forgery and fraud and use of a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx- 4425 (the Social Security number was not redaced in the letter to the DOJ, was redacted for publication)  of Harrison J. Bounel,  by Barack Obama since 1977 until now. Obama not only ran for office in 2008 and 2012, but was also a voter right here in California when he attended college here, as well as in Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, Illinois and Washington DC.
There is a heightened public interest to this matter, and when attached pleadings were posted on TaitzReport.com, OrlyTaitzESQ.com and linked to X and facebook, the web site crashed due to an extremely large number of requests.
The public is specifically interested in this matter after the revelations by the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, stating that Obama fabricated the intelligence of Trump- Russia Collusion. While Obama might evade prosecution of Trump-Russia matter due to the presidential immunity, however he cannot claim presidential immunity in relation to his use of a stolen CT Social Security number and fabricated IDs, as this is a personal matter, not related to his presidential functions, and the statute  of limitations will not apply, as Obama used the same fraudulent voter registrations, made based on a stolen CT SSN, as recently as last year, while voting in November 2024, and he is using the same bogus IDs monthly to draw his retirement benefits from Illinois, from his tenure in the US senate and presidency. Moreover, becoming the US president based on stolen and fabricated IDs will likely invalidate the legitimacy of his whole presidency, which might mean that the presidential immunity will not apply to the matters of fabricating evidence in Trump-Russia collusion.
This email with the names of DOJ attorneys, who received it is being made public. A response or lack of response will also be made public as this is a matter of heightened public interest. The public wants to know that nobody is above the law and that the DOJ does not sweep things under the rug.

Respectfully Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

 

Muench, Kevin (CRT)

6:41 AM (49 minutes ago)
to Maureen, Katherine, Michael, Katie, Richard, me
Hello Dr. Taitz,
We do not object to your filing an amicus. Thank you.
My best,
Kevin Muench–

Kevin Muench

U.S. Department of Justice

Dhillon, Harmeet K. (CRT)

7:56 PM (1 minute ago)
to me
Hello,
I am out of the office traveling and have limited access to email at this time. I will respond to messages when I return on August 4.
If you need immediate assistance, please contact my Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jesus Osete at jesus.osete@usdoj.gov or my assistant Deborah Cumbee at deborah.cumbee@usdoj.gov.
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

2 Responses to “Second request for a position on Amicus Curiae. Defense does not oppose. Update: US Department of Justice does not oppose”

  1. Al Chapman
    July 28th, 2025 @ 1:02 pm

    This is being sent to the DoJ, and it’s not their call. To file an amicus brief, also known as a “friend of the court” brief, you generally need to obtain permission from the court or the consent of all parties involved, unless it’s a specific jurisdiction where it’s allowed without permission. The brief itself must adhere to specific formatting and content rules, which can be found in court rules and practice guides.

  2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 28th, 2025 @ 11:13 pm

    DOJ represents the plaintiff, United States. Neither party in the case opposed the A micus

Leave a Reply