Second NBC interview of my case. This time they interviewed the client David Farrar
Posted on | January 22, 2012 | 2 Comments
https://www.11alive.com/news/article/223412/40/Ga-judge-orders-president-to-appear-at-hearing
Disclaimer: Prior to the interview Mr. Farrar did not tell me, that he is planning to challenge Romney as well. I will not be an attorney on the challenge of Romney, as there is no evidence to support such challenge. Even though Romney’s father was born in Mexico, he was a US citizen. Romney was born to two US citizens in the US. As I am still in CA, I have no control of what a client says to NBC in GA.
Comments
2 Responses to “Second NBC interview of my case. This time they interviewed the client David Farrar”
Leave a Reply
January 23rd, 2012 @ 8:48 am
The ‘Birthers’ Are Back
https://blogs.news.sky.com/americanpie/Post:66e455dc-a34f-4fbb-b231-d8f7a25126a1
January 23rd, 2012 @ 3:58 pm
By trying to conflate the eligibility question of Mr Romney and Mr Obama, client Farrar has ended up confusing the issue.
The same strategy was employed last time, when Mr McCain’s birth in the Panama Zone was also raised.
If it is held out that BOTH candidates are equally culpable, and equally vulnerable, then both end up with a draw, a tie, politically speaking. This does not help us, Orly.
It would lead to the public belief that “they both do it” and that, therefore, there is nothing to be done.
I hope your investigators checked our Mr Farrar thoroughly, before you took him on as a client. They need to do a deep background check on him, and find out his connections, his employment history, his education, and his real motives.
He may — or may not — be a secret Obot, but the fact is that by going after Mr Romney he has made it more difficult to keep going after Mr Obama. And that doesn’t help at all.
If Mr Farrar persists in confusing the issue, it would be best if you dropped him as a client. He might be working for the other side. Spreading confusion is always an effective tool in the enemy’s hands.
God Bless!