“Real Clear politics” compilation of polls site aids establishment Bush and hurts Trump by not including certain polls
Posted on | July 13, 2015 | 8 Comments
FOX stated that it will include in the debates top 10 candidates according to the average of polls published by Real Clear Politics site. This site appears to be aiding the establishment in not reporting two major national polls, where Trump is at the top.
First, they did not include the poll by a very respectable magazine, Economist, where Trump was first and Bush second. Trump had 15% and Bush 11%. What was even more damaging for the establishment, is when the compilation of first and second places was calculated, Trump was far ahead with a total of 25% of likely GOP voters placing him first or second. Poll: Donald Trump Leads as GOP Frontrunner – Breitbart. Economist Poll: Trump Leads GOP Presidential Field
Further, Real Clear Politics did not include in their site Reuters/ Ipsos poll, which showed Trump tied with Bush. Both of these polls helped to propel Trump over Bush, who previously led the GOP pack. Reuters: Trump, Bush Locked in Dead Heat; Rubio Sinks to Tenth Place.
Please, contact Trump campaign and relate to them my findings.
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
see RCP compilation of polls below at link
-
RealClearPolitics – Election 2016 Presidential Polls
www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/RealClearPoliticsElection 2016 Presidential Polls. All Election Polls · President 2016 … Race/Topic (Click to Sort), Poll, Results, Spread … General Election: Christie vs. Clinton …
Comments
8 Responses to ““Real Clear politics” compilation of polls site aids establishment Bush and hurts Trump by not including certain polls”
Leave a Reply
July 13th, 2015 @ 7:59 am
webmaster@donaldjtrump.com
July 13th, 2015 @ 8:08 am
hill and billary depositions soon
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/247655-clintons-to-answer-questions-in-email-lawsuit
July 13th, 2015 @ 8:54 am
no, they were not ordered by a judge to appear in depositions. A plaintiff penned this notice of a deposition. I am sure that they will file an objection and will never show up.
July 13th, 2015 @ 9:26 am
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/judge-orders-clinton-foundation-racketeering-case-to-trial/article/2565272
July 13th, 2015 @ 9:35 am
no, this is an automatic date setting given as the case is filed and before the motion to dismiss is filed and ruled upon. In most of my cases against Obama there were automatic dates for trial, however these dates meant absolutely nothing. In all of them the defendants filed motions to dismiss and the judges dismissed the cases against Obama. I expect that Clintons will file a motion to dismiss citing lack of standing and lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the judge will dismiss the case shortly. I might be wrong, but I am 99.9% sure that is what will happen.
July 13th, 2015 @ 2:37 pm
thx for the info Orly, you are most likely right on.
July 14th, 2015 @ 5:31 am
Lindsay Graham, on Fox & Friends, sounding bitter and sophomoric:
1. Trump’s comments are “horrible” and should be rejected by the party, esp as most illegal aliens are “Good people.” (Dear Lindsay, GOOD PEOPLE do NOT trespass, work with Fake social security numbers, and take government benefits when they are not supposed to be here!)
2. Says he would be doing better if “he had had a show on Fox.”
3. Says he would be doing better if he had had “a father and brother who had been president.”
4. Says he would be doing better if he “were rich.”
In a nutshell, it was a Pity Party with only a plate of Sour Grapes for the guests.
July 14th, 2015 @ 6:31 am
Walker is not rich, his father and brother were not presidents and he did not have a show on FOX, yet he is doing much better in the polls than Graham