OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

No answer from Judge Lamberth yet

Posted on | October 3, 2013 | 8 Comments

U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL

TAITZ v. ASTRUE
Assigned to: Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth

 Cases: 1:10-cv-00151-RCL
1:11-cv-01421-RCL
1:13-cv-01020-RCL
Case in other court:  USCA, 11-05304

Cause: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act

 Date Filed: 02/16/2011
Date Terminated: 08/30/2011
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 895 Freedom of Information Act
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff
ORLY TAITZ
Dr.		 represented by ORLY TAITZ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Suite 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
(949) 683 – 5411
Fax: (949) 766 – 7603
Email: orly.taitz@gmail.com
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration		 represented by Patrick George Nemeroff 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Room 5381
Washington, DC 20530
(202) 305-8727
Fax: (202) 616-8470
Email: patrick.g.nemeroff@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
DOES
1 – 100
TERMINATED: 04/08/2011
V.
Interested Party
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Movant
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Dr.		 represented by PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Island of Taiwan in the Allied American Formosa Trust
Territory, West Pacific
27-1 Yu Nung Rd
5th floor 1-2, 5A3
East Dist
Taiwan City 70164
289-7481
PRO SE

 

Date Filed # Docket Text
02/16/2011 Summons (1) Issued as to MICHAEL ASTRUE. (jf, ) (Entered: 02/22/2011)
02/16/2011 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by ORLY TAITZ. Case related to Case No. 10-cv-151. (jf, ) (Entered: 02/22/2011)
04/08/2011 4 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing by ORLY TAITZ. “Let this be filed, The Court notes mailing was sent to improper address for the U.S. Attorney, and time to respond doesn’t run until U.S. Attorney is properly served.” by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth.(rdj) (Entered: 04/11/2011)
04/08/2011 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 3/30/2011. (rdj) (Entered: 04/13/2011)
04/21/2011 6 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia with Summons and First Amended Complaint by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 04/25/2011)
05/17/2011 7 AFFIDAVIT FOR DEFAULT by ORLY TAITZ. “Let this be filed. Request DENIED. No proof of service has been filed ; only proof of mailing.” by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth(rdj) (Entered: 05/19/2011)
05/20/2011 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MICHAEL ASTRUE served on 3/28/2011, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 4/3/2011. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 5/3/2011.) (rdj) (Entered: 05/23/2011)
05/23/2011 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick George Nemeroff on behalf of MICHAEL ASTRUE (Nemeroff, Patrick) Modified on 5/24/2011 to correct filer(rdj). (Entered: 05/23/2011)
05/23/2011 10 ANSWER to 3 Amended Complaint by MICHAEL ASTRUE. Related document: 3 Amended Complaint filed by ORLY TAITZ.(Nemeroff, Patrick) Modified on 5/24/2011 to correct filer (rdj). (Entered: 05/23/2011)
05/23/2011 11 MOTION to Strike 1 Complaint, 3 Amended Complaint and Attached Exhibits by MICHAEL ASTRUE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nemeroff, Patrick) Modified on 5/24/2011 to correct filer (rdj). (Entered: 05/23/2011)
05/31/2011 12 MOTION to Compel Preparation of a Vaughn Index by ORLY TAITZ (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(rdj) (Entered: 06/02/2011)
06/02/2011 13 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Strike. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 6/2/11. (rje, ) (Entered: 06/03/2011)
06/02/2011 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: Any Dispositive Motions by defendant shall be due within thirty (30) days. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 6/2/11. (rje, ) (Entered: 06/03/2011)
06/08/2011 15 MOTION to Intervene, MOTION for Hearing on contempt of the Court’s order of June 2 by PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER “Let this be filed. Motion and all reliefs DENIED.” Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth(rdj) (Entered: 06/09/2011)
06/14/2011 16 Redacted COMPLAINT against MICHAEL ASTRUE ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616036614) filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Per 06/02/2011 Order 13 )(rdj) Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible in paper form and on ECF. (Entered: 06/15/2011)
06/14/2011 17 Redacted AMENDED COMPLAINT against MICHAEL ASTRUE filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Per 06/02/2011 Order 13 )(rdj) Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible in paper form and on ECF. (Entered: 06/15/2011)
06/14/2011 Leave to File Denied. Notice of Motion and Motion for Default Judgment, “Leave to file DENIED. No certificate of service on counsel for defendant.” by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth (rdj) (Entered: 06/15/2011)
06/20/2011 18 MOTION to Strike 10 Answer to Amended Complaint by ORLY TAITZ (rdj) Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible in paper form and on ECF. (Entered: 06/21/2011)
06/22/2011 19 MOTION for Clarification by ORLY TAITZ Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible in paper form and on ECF.(rdj) (Entered: 06/23/2011)
06/22/2011 20 MOTION for Default Judgment by ORLY TAITZ Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible in paper form and on ECF.(rdj) (Entered: 06/23/2011)
07/01/2011 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment by MICHAEL ASTRUE (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts, # 2 Memorandum in Support, # 3 Text of Proposed Order, # 4 Exhibit A, # 5 Exhibit B, # 6 Exhibit C, # 7 Exhibit D, # 8 Exhibit E)(Nemeroff, Patrick) (Entered: 07/01/2011)
07/08/2011 22 MOTION to Compel by ORLY TAITZ Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible in paper form and on ECF.(rdj) (Entered: 07/11/2011)
07/20/2011 24 MOTION to Strike 23 Memorandum in Opposition by MICHAEL ASTRUE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nemeroff, Patrick) (Entered: 07/20/2011)
07/21/2011 25 ORDER granting 24 Motion to Strike 23 Memorandum in Opposition. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 7/20/11. (rje) (Entered: 07/21/2011)
07/21/2011 26 ORDER that plaintiff shall file the redacted version of her Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment within fourteen days of this date. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on July 21, 2011. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 07/21/2011)
07/22/2011 27 MOTION for Reconsideration re 25 Order on Motion to Strike by ORLY TAITZ (rdj) (Entered: 07/25/2011)
07/25/2011 29 ORDER to seal Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 7/25/11. (rje) (Entered: 07/25/2011)
07/25/2011 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 27 Motion for Reconsideration and Striking 28 Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 7/25/11. (rje) (Entered: 07/25/2011)
07/27/2011 31 Memorandum in opposition to re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ORLY TAITZ. “Let this be filed, except for Exhibit 9, which shall be filed under seal only since it still contains improper redactions.” by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 9 *Sealed pursuant to Chief Judge Lamberth*)(various pages are illegible in paper form and on ECF)(zrdj) (Entered: 07/28/2011)
08/03/2011 32 REPLY to opposition to motion re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MICHAEL ASTRUE. (Nemeroff, Patrick) (Entered: 08/03/2011)
08/30/2011 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on August 30, 2011. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 08/30/2011)
08/30/2011 34 ORDER granting 21 defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on August 30, 2011. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 08/30/2011)
08/30/2011 35 ORDER denying 12 Motion to Compel; denying 18 Motion to Strike; denying 19 Motion for Clarification; denying 20 Motion for Default Judgment; and denying 22 Motion to Compel. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on August 30, 2011. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 08/30/2011)
09/09/2011 36 MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment by ORLY TAITZ (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit (Unredacted))(various pages are illegible in paper form and on ECF) (Entered: 09/13/2011)
09/23/2011 37 Memorandum in opposition to re 36 MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Default Judgment,,,,,, 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Default Judgment,,,,,, 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment filed by MICHAEL ASTRUE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nemeroff, Patrick) (Entered: 09/23/2011)
09/30/2011 38 REPLY to opposition to motion re 36 MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment filed by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 10/03/2011)
10/17/2011 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 36 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on October 17, 2011. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 10/17/2011)
10/25/2011 40 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment by ORLY TAITZ. Filing fee $ 0.00. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (rdj) (Entered: 10/26/2011)
10/26/2011 41 Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. The Fee remains to be paid and another notice will be transmitted when the fee has been paid in the District Court re 40 Notice of Appeal. (rdj) (Entered: 10/26/2011)
11/01/2011 USCA Case Number 11-5304 for 40 Notice of Appeal filed by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 11/01/2011)
12/02/2011 USCA Appeal Fees received $ 455 receipt number 4616044235 re 40 Notice of Appeal filed by ORLY TAITZ (rdj) (Entered: 12/02/2011)
12/02/2011 42 Supplemental Record on Appeal transmitted to US Court of Appeals re 40 Notice of Appeal ; (rdj) (Entered: 12/02/2011)
08/30/2012 43 MANDATE of USCA (certified copy) as to 40 Notice of Appeal filed by ORLY TAITZ ; ORDERED that the motion for default judgement be denied; FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be denied and the motion for summary affirmance be granted. USCA Case Number 11-5304. (md, ) (Entered: 08/30/2012)
06/07/2013 44 ORDER denying leave to file. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 06/07/2013. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 06/07/2013)
06/13/2013 45 Emergency MOTION for Reconsideration by ORLY TAITZ (Attachments: # 1 Letter to the Court)”Let this be filed along with the attached motions and documents.”, by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth(rdj) (Entered: 06/14/2013)
06/14/2013 MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, the Court made minor additional redactions to plaintiff’s Motion 45 . Only the last four digits of the taxpayer-identification number and the year of an individual’s birth may be included in court filings. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 06/14/2013. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 06/14/2013)
07/01/2013 46 NOTICE OF DEFAULT/FAILURE TO ANSWER TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION by ORLY TAITZ (rdj) (Entered: 07/02/2013)
07/02/2013 47 RESPONSE re 45 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nemeroff, Patrick) (Entered: 07/02/2013)
07/02/2013 48 MOTION for Leave to File Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration by MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nemeroff, Patrick) (Entered: 07/02/2013)
07/08/2013 49 MOTION to Strike 47 Response to motion by ORLY TAITZ (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(rdj) (Entered: 07/09/2013)
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

8 Responses to “No answer from Judge Lamberth yet”

  1. Rod Riddle
    October 3rd, 2013 @ 8:43 pm

    Back in June when Holder was supposed to have had to release the original Bounel application, what was the clowns response for not producing the document?

  2. American Fan of Orly
    October 3rd, 2013 @ 10:06 pm

    Wow, this case has been a slug fest from the start…lucky for them that you are a woman, otherwise it would be more than their legal reputations that would be battered and beaten to a pulp!

  3. K.T.
    October 4th, 2013 @ 4:46 am

    Lamberth probably left the Country….

  4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 4th, 2013 @ 7:34 am

    they said they could not find it, even though they found it before and said that they will not release it due to privacy

  5. vharlow
    October 4th, 2013 @ 7:50 am

    Judge Lamberth retired! You need to find out who’s in charge of these filings…

  6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 4th, 2013 @ 8:08 am

    no, he is no longer the chief judge, but he is a senior judge and he is in charge of 2 of my ongoing cases

  7. Rod Riddle
    October 4th, 2013 @ 8:30 am

    Privacy does not apply here. The 120 year rule is in effect now on the Bounel App. Who is Holder claiming privacy for? If he says Obama, then that is a blatant admission that he is using the stolen SS# that was issued to Bounel.

  8. js/js
    October 5th, 2013 @ 3:51 pm

    IMO, Lamberth will not be allowed to rule by
    Holder & DOJ. Lamberth will be sent to Gitmo,
    and then may have a heart problem, etc. Typical
    Fascist and Stalinist terror tactics. IMO. Do
    NOT be surprised!

Leave a Reply