OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Ninth Circuit abruptly canceled the oral argument in Obama-forgery case. Let the supporters know that they should not come to the hearing

Posted on | October 7, 2015 | 30 Comments

13-16359 James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al “Clerk Order Filed”

ca9_ecfnoticing@ca9.uscourts.gov

10:31 AM (43 minutes ago)

to me

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity

The following transaction was entered on 10/07/2015 at 10:30:53 AM PDT and filed on 10/07/2015

Case Name: James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al
Case Number:   13-16359
Document(s): Document(s)

Docket Text:
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: WL): The Court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and that oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process. Therefore, this matter is ordered submitted without oral argument on October 20, 2015, at San Francisco, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Plaintiffs-Appellants’ motion for miscellaneous relief (motion for additional time during oral argument and motion for clarification) is DENIED. [9709768] (WL)

Comments

30 Responses to “Ninth Circuit abruptly canceled the oral argument in Obama-forgery case. Let the supporters know that they should not come to the hearing”

  1. EARTHPLANET
    October 7th, 2015 @ 12:20 pm

    BECAUSE SOMEONE HAD A FUNERAL TO ATTEND TO ..LIKE LAMBERT.. BEEN 2 1/2 YEARS LAMBERT..

    ON OTHER NEWS…

    Billary.. Worse spies that were lawyers in American History. One an outright liar the other a outright lying rapist.

    The FBI is primarily concerned with trying to determine how Top Secret information made its way on to the private server.

    https://freebeacon.com/politics/fbi-seizes-four-state-department-servers-in-clinton-email-probe/

    https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article37968711.html

  2. John
    October 7th, 2015 @ 12:28 pm

    WTF!

  3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 7th, 2015 @ 12:37 pm

    my feelings exactly

  4. CPT Barnett
    October 7th, 2015 @ 1:00 pm

    More judicial/government tyranny! How much more will we take?

    I guess we can have protest outside court for not having oral argument.

  5. Kevin J Lankford
    October 7th, 2015 @ 1:07 pm

    Sounds like double speak for “we just don’t wanna hear cause we don’t care”. They can’t handle the truth..

  6. John
    October 7th, 2015 @ 2:18 pm

    A Cover up!

  7. Harry A. Ness
    October 7th, 2015 @ 2:39 pm

    If you hold a protest, I’ll be there!

  8. Donna
    October 7th, 2015 @ 2:45 pm

    Was this Cody Judys case? I saw it thepost@email that the Supreme CourtThrew his case out.

  9. turnright
    October 7th, 2015 @ 3:13 pm

    I acknowledge your frustration. Perhaps they have enough enough evidence, and the gonads, to perform a legal coup. That would be interesting.

    Here’s something unrelated that goes to answer your questioning about the Oregon shooter’s toxicology. It’s really revealing, I think we’ll all agree:

    https://www.naturalnews.com/051453_Christopher_Mercer_psychiatric_medications_autism_spectrum_disorder.html

  10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 7th, 2015 @ 3:19 pm

    no this is a different case

  11. Larry
    October 7th, 2015 @ 3:56 pm

    They don’t want to have to look her in the face when they give their treasonous “No Standing” ruling…..again….they can hide…BUT one day they will have to stand before a court themselves and answer for all their corrupt rulings. THAT is the day I am looking forward to seeing.

  12. John
    October 7th, 2015 @ 4:10 pm

    They are shutting down our free speech!

  13. Danny Stewart
    October 7th, 2015 @ 4:52 pm

    What else would one expect from the ninth “circus” court.

  14. Danny Stewart
    October 7th, 2015 @ 4:56 pm

    The ninth “circus” court cannot be relied upon for anything but liberal agendas.

  15. Edith Xenochovic
    October 7th, 2015 @ 6:05 pm

    This is just awful, I am very disappointed.

  16. Jerry G
    October 8th, 2015 @ 4:08 am

    That’s why this court is called the Ninth Circut Court of Schlemiels. (Michael Savage)

  17. JD
    October 8th, 2015 @ 5:18 am

    So what does this mean it was cancelled? Will be rescheduled? Cancelled due to no standing? What now? It seems to me after Obama leaves office it won’t matter anymore.

  18. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 8th, 2015 @ 6:15 am

    it means that they will rule on the pleadings without the oral argument

  19. e. scott
    October 8th, 2015 @ 6:27 am

    How long a time period can be expected, for a ruling?

  20. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 8th, 2015 @ 6:30 am

    you never know. Can be a couple of weeks, can be 6 months

  21. Rich
    October 8th, 2015 @ 7:34 am

    I assume it will be settled politically behind the scenes. The worse our economy gets the better our chances of getting a favorable ruling would be my guess. Sad state of affairs when out lives have to get worse before they can get better.

  22. EyeballNews
    October 8th, 2015 @ 8:54 am

    So, how many more months/years will the people have to wait before they release their ruling?

  23. EyeballNews
    October 8th, 2015 @ 8:56 am

    Let’s try and be positive here (even though the 9th has a horrible track record of supporting the law). I hope they found Orly’s evidence sound and rule against the usurper.

  24. Danny H
    October 8th, 2015 @ 9:25 am

    With courts overreaching, they may assume that they have precedent (authority) to do the same. However, I want to remain hopeful. Ideally we will see all wrongs made right, after a sound and judicious ruling. We have lived through enough of this nightmare, so hopefully we will not have a early Halloween or April fools. Let’s be encouraged and remain hopeful.

  25. John
    October 8th, 2015 @ 10:09 am

    And now McCarthy is out! Looks like Webster is IN!

  26. JEAN
    October 8th, 2015 @ 12:05 pm
  27. Wow!
    October 8th, 2015 @ 2:04 pm

    If the economy/dollar, etc., continue to stay down and doesn’t come back, then, this will help the (R)’s in the next election!

    The groups that are trying to take us down, by the dollar/economy/currency…this will make the American Public see who the real problem group(s) is/are!

    This will help America in Nov.-2016!

  28. Starlight
    October 8th, 2015 @ 9:08 pm
  29. Larry
    October 9th, 2015 @ 4:07 am

    you never know. Can be a couple of weeks, can be 6 months

    I’m guesstimating about 30 to 60 days AFTER the Liar-In-Chief leaves office…and their response will be …That’s ancient history, and does not apply to today’s world.

  30. Larry
    October 9th, 2015 @ 4:12 am

    John #25

    Don’t bet on it…Bonehead looks like he is pulling the old….”If I can’t pick my replacement (clone of me),We just won’t vote on anybody else”

Leave a Reply