More on voter fraud and reversing the results in blackbox voting. We have to de-certify all electronic voting and ballot counting machines. The voters have to get access to 100% of the voter registrations and ballots
Posted on | November 28, 2010 | 3 Comments
Washington bringing King County inefficiency to Kitsap
Oct 17 2008
Voters would be unwise to ratify Walt Washington’s temporary appointment as Kitsap County auditor. He is an export from King County’s notorious elections division, and since his appointment here he has already been personally cited with approximately a dozen public disclosure violations and other discrepancies operating our Kitsap County Auditor’s Office.
He was trained in the culture of Dean Logan, the King County elections director (himself a Kitsap County export in 2001), who presided over the Dino Rossi election debacle of 2004 and within months had negotiated and jumped ship to a safer location in the Democrat-controlled Los Angeles Elections Division.
Logan was cited by a May 2005 no-confidence resolution introduced into the King County Council and was facing a possible federal grand jury investigation for the many infractions for which he was responsible. (Documentation can be easily recovered by a Yahoo or Google search).
Logan had been earlier trained by Kitsap County’s recently retired auditor. What goes around comes around.
The illegalities she defended were serious enough to document with local law enforcement and the Washington Secretary of State, though no subsequent responses were taken. (Information available upon request.)
Appointing a successor official from the same political party shortly before a voter election is a well-recognized technique to promote the appearance of incumbency and, hopefully, gain uninformed voter support.
It would be a shame to fall for this and fail to elect Washington’s highly qualified opponent, John Clark.
The Democrat Party election machine has to go. It’s in Kitsap’s best interest to clean house now and to vote for John Clark, experienced in business, education and government service and who promises to “promote voter confidence by working diligently to ensure creditable, trustworthy, secure elections.
We need that.
KARL DUFF
Port Orchard
Hacking and Logan
https://www.51capitalmarch.com/51CapitalMarchBlackboxVoting.shtml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Time is not irrelevant. Election manipulation has a large component of running out the clock, and you know as well as I do that the interim information may or may not be retained, and that the public may or may not (usually NOT) be able to see it until the clock has run out. In Florida in 2004, all of the largest counties decided to delay production of information until after the election was certified.
Again, you are confusing one thing with another. Yes, precinct results are available. No, that’s not the same thing as grabbing slices every 15 minutes of the precinct results as they come in.
You are protesting so vehemently against gathering data as it comes in that it doesn’t make sense, Kurt. If you believe it is of no value, don’t collect it. Those who do collect it will learn that it is or is not of value. I’ve seen enough to know that it IS of value.
Let me give you another example. Because I was on site, I got time slice data (interim data) in a King County, Washington election in September 2004. Later, I found that three hours was missing from an audit log for the GEMS tabulator during that time. The reason stated by Dean Logan is that the machine was inactive during the missing three hours (or more specificaly, “nothing was happening” in the machine). I had ascertained that the same machine producing the interim totals was the machine that produced the audit log missing three hours. The existence of the interim totals — and the TIME STAMPS on those interim totals — proved that the machine was NOT inactive during the missing three hours. They altered the audit log to delete three hours. The time slice information proved that it had been ALTERED, and that it was not merely inactive.
I think a reasonable rationale has been described for collecting time slices.
Comments
3 Responses to “More on voter fraud and reversing the results in blackbox voting. We have to de-certify all electronic voting and ballot counting machines. The voters have to get access to 100% of the voter registrations and ballots”
Leave a Reply
November 28th, 2010 @ 10:41 am
Go to YouTubePlay video
Insist on paper ballots in your voting area. Thanks to those who have provided important links in the comments. I’ve posted them here to make it more convenient. Lawsuit to stop the use of e-voting…
00:02:31
Added on 12/17/07
3,808 views
November 28th, 2010 @ 3:20 pm
there is no link attached
November 29th, 2010 @ 12:52 am
Please don’t give up attempting to get the attention of the public concerning voter fraud. Exposing and explaining it is very difficult. That is why most don’t pay attention. How we could be, and most likley were, disenfranchised does not fit into sound bites. That is a major reason for the success of election control. Hardly any citizen knows how his or her vote is delivered securely. In fact, there is very little security, and no audit trail, that on top of illegal registrations and the abolition of voter ID requirements. Our legislators have guaranteed our right to cheat, but it really matters little because the counts are not verifiable.
The details of how numbers are inserted into records no one could track anyway are like explaining how the card you swipe at the gas pump generates a decrement from your checking account. The reason we aren’t cheated more there is that each individual may have kept his receipt, or may challenge it. With voting there are no receipts and no individual can check his/her balance.
Today, paper ballots and precinct counts are our only mechanism to assure that we are governed by those we intended. There are sophisticated solutions but they need lots of scrutiny. We are not a representative republic today because we don’t really elect our representatives. California is not a pure blue state as elections imply. California simply has mobsters in control of the voting process. We have an oligarchy. There is no reason to have two parties in California when only one controls voting.
Keep it up Dr. Taitz. You are reviled because you know the truth. Running for Secretary of State was brilliant because the SOS controls elections, the reason George Soros initiated his Secretary of State project. As businesses move out of the oligarchy which California has become, the federal government will have to let it fail. Then there will be the opportunity to restructure. Meanwhile, the initiative process is the closest thing California has to representative democracy, and corrupt judges will not survive to overturn every initiative when other states refuse to provide credit. Some claim not to understand how initiatives seem so at odd with the “Progressives” in San Fran and Los Angeles. How could black voters have voted for Proposition 8? How could voters have required that we educate only legal citizens? How could the fools have limited the increases in property taxes with Prop. 13? Our elections have probably been a fraud for decades. Now we must fix them, or leave the state for public unions to rape for their rich guaranteed retirment programs while businesses move, as they must, to where productivity counts.
Again, voting is the most peaceful answer. Verifiable voting must be simple. Computer technicians should not be legislators. Get rid of the computers for just this process. Later, let the public decide whether to trust opaque technology to transmit our legislative preferences. We decide nothing now, and the press, as usual, is a tool of tyrants. They must be expected to protect the Ruling Class, as they have protected the eligibility of the White House resident whose father was not a citizen of the U.S., and thus not a natural born citizen.