Marxist thugs in Wikipedia are upset about me calling them what they really are
Posted on | March 25, 2010 | No Comments
Orly!
There are some interesting persons suggested as your friends on Facebook; I don’t think I can take the decisions needed so I believe you should take care of those leaving the ones that are to be sent the prepared message.
Regarding Wikipedia it is a tough match to break through the wall of alleged “reliable sources” that always are mentioned when I try to edit something. I am for the moment involved in discussions with other contributors, and one Ravensfire (one of the many pseudonyms at Wikipedia) is quite upset that you called James M Lane a “Marxist thug” on your blog and that you and I have contact which each other. He has asked me to repudiate your statement about Lane, something I can’t and won’t do.
Regards,
Magnus
I could not get Wiki publish A WORD OF TRUTH about numerous news paper reporters writing positive reports about me. All they write in Wiki, is garbage about honest politicians and attorneys who care about this nation, about the Constitution and law and order. Wikipedia is a wholly owned subsidiary of “Marxist thugs are us”.
Eor example, they quote a totally unsubstantiated complaint to the CA bar by some Obama buddy Marxist -Socialist probably Muslim attorney, whose name I can’t even pronounce. These Marxist thugs from Wikipedia didn’t care to write, that even though this complaint was sent over a year ago, CA bar did not find any violations in what I am doing. They didn’t write that I have a clean license.
Even something as small as a picture, they would use against you. They typically would publish flattering pictures of liberal politicians, but after numerous requests did not place a picture of me on my page. We really nead an alternative, we need honest reporting.
Comments
Leave a Reply