Latest on FOX news website “Greta WIRE” (for Greta Von Susteren)
Posted on | September 15, 2010 | No Comments
OBAMA runs SCREAMING from ORLY!
(5 posts) (1 voice)
- Started 31 minutes ago by Logia
- Latest reply from Logia
-
Logia
MemberObama’s Tax Funded Stooges File Obama’s Opposition to Taitz’s Motion for Reconsideration in the Taitz v Obama Quo Warranto.
https://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/09/obamas-tax-funded-stooges-file-obamas.html
Below is the motion just filed by Obama’s Stooges seeking to dismiss attorney Taitz’s ’60B Motion for Reconsideration’ in the Taitz v Obama Quo Warranto. Below Obama’s motion is atty Taitz’s motion for reconsideration/exhibits. Again Mr. Usurper, would it not be easier to release the records these lawsuits seek instead of fighting them with lawyers paid with our tax dollars!? Not long ago you stated this;
“The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.”
…Again, I agree 100%!!!
Posted 31 minutes ago # -
Logia
MemberTHAT OLD TIRED MANTRA Of “NO STANDING” but THIS TIME OBAMA ratchets up the DISDAIN for ORLY’s TENACITY and puts in a nasty zinger: ” Instead, she rehashes her same arguments”…….Soebarkah, if ANYONE is REHASHING it is your HAWAIIAN LUAO with a MOMBASA twist!
———————-DEFENDANT’S(Obama) OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Defendant, Barack H. Obama, respectfully opposes Plaintiff’s second motion for reconsideration (R.34). Plaintiff claims in this case that President Obama committed fraud regarding his qualification for office as a “natural born citizen.” This Court recently dismissed the action for lack of constitutional standing (R.22 & R.23) and denied Plaintiff’s first motion for reconsideration (R.25 & R.33). Plaintiff moves under Rule 60(b) but she again presents no information or arguments that come close to meeting the standard for reconsideration. Instead, she rehashes her same arguments and cloaks them as addressing “mistakes of fact” in this Court’s prior decisions. Viewed under any standard, her motion does nothing to make her claims appear any stronger than previously presented.
Posted 28 minutes ago # -
Logia
MemberNot worth reposting here but if you go to the link you can read Obama’s Argument. The style is SOPHOMORIC and rushed! It is almost as if they are throwing the kitchen sink against her as their TITANIC of INELIGIBILITY sinks under the weight of CONSTITUTIONALISM!
————-Argument
The repetition in her arguments is clear from a simple comparison of what Plaintiff says now to what she argued before in opposing Defendant’s motion to dismiss (R.21) and in support of her amended Rule 59(b) motion for reconsideration (R.25):
Posted 23 minutes ago # -
Logia
MemberWorldNetDaily.com
‘Birther in chief’ invited to dinner by Harry Reid
The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, responsible for putting a charge in races where a seat in the U.S. Senate is at stake for the party, has invited Orly Taitz, the California lawyer responsible for a long list of legal and other challenges to Barack Obama’s eligibility, to one of its events that will feature the president.
The invitation prompted Taitz to post a copy on her website under the headline “You want what Mr. Reid????????????”
Read the latest now on WND.com.Posted 21 minutes ago # -
Logia
MemberAHH THE PLOT THICKENS! The DISTRICT ATTY for OBAMA is a DONOR and CAMPAIGN SUPPORTER!
Shouldn’t this cause him to RECUSE HIMSELF rather than SUPPORT THE FRAUD?
Keep watching THE GLOBE MAGAZINE I bet!
———————-Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, Defendant asks the Court to deny Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration.
September 14, 2010 Respectfully submitted,
RONALD C. MACHEN JR., D.C. Bar #447889
United States Attorney
for the District of Columbia AKA(Obama Supporter/Donor/Appointee)
Posted 13 minutes ago #
RSS feed for this topic
Comments
Leave a Reply