8 Responses to “It was not an order from the judge, Obama regime voluntarily agreed to release Benghazi docs, Taitz believes it is done to divert attention from challenges relating to Obama’s use of a stolen SSN and bogus IDs”

1. bob68
   May 6th, 2014 @ 11:30 am

   Did the regime redact, remove or change any of the information on the emails they released?

2. Denise
   May 6th, 2014 @ 11:41 am

   I believe government would rather have 0webama resign than removed as a usurper which would prove them all guilty of treason for their aiding and abetting.

3. bob68
   May 6th, 2014 @ 6:15 pm

   Denise,

   You are correct. Congress would prefer that Obama hang on until 2017 and leave office still officially considered a legitimate president, and they will do everything they can to make that happen. But, if it looks like he is going to be removed from office on ineligibility/identity fraud, they will want him to resign, thinking it will be easier for them to fight treason charges if Obama resigned while still considered legitimate.

4. Harry
   May 6th, 2014 @ 8:43 pm

   something is going on in the smoke-filled backrooms of the DEMOCRATIC party-Obama does not voluntarily do anything he doesn’t want to do- Obama’s rich backers are selecting who they want to be their next stoolie puppet- they can crush Benghazi like a grape if they wanted to- maybe they don’t want Hillary because she is not as easy as Obama is to control-

5. courage
   May 6th, 2014 @ 9:42 pm

   BySTEPHANIE CONDONCBS NEWSMay 6, 2014, 10:35 AM
   John Kerry won’t comply with Benghazi subpoena, State Dept. says

   U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry looks back as he leaves Paris, Monday, March 31, 2014, for a trip to the Middle East to work on talks about the Middle East peace process. AP

   139 Comments 520 Shares 166 Tweets Stumble Email More +
   Secretary of State John Kerry won’t comply with the subpoena he received to appear before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on May 21 because he will be out of the country that day, a State Department spokesman said Monday.

   Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., subpoenaed Kerry to testify before the committee about the Sept. 11, 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya that left four Americans dead, but Kerry has plans to be in Mexico on the day of the hearing, spokesman Marie Harf told reporters.

   “We were all surprised, quite frankly, that instead of working with us and reaching out to us and offering first an invitation to testify, that Chairman Issa jumped immediately to subpoenaing the Secretary,” Harf said.

   John Kerry subpoenaed to answer questions about Benghazi
   Democrats: Special Benghazi panel nothing but politics
   Issa said in a statement last week that he was subpoenaing Kerry because the State Department had failed to produce all the documents related to the Benghazi attack and the State Department’s response to it. “Compliance with a subpoena for documents is not a game,” Issa said.

   In response to the charge that the State Department hasn’t cooperated with Issa, Harf said, “We strongly disagree with that… We’ve produced tens of thousands of documents.”

   She did say, however, that the State Department will talk to the Oversight Committee about possibly arranging for Kerry to appear before the committee at some other point.

   Harf also pointed out that during the Bush administration, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Issa himself said the secretary of state shouldn’t be subpoenaed to appear before a committee. She cited a quote from Boehner in 2007, when he complained about an attempt to subpoena then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to testify at a congresssional committee about the Iraq war.

   Boehner called the the congressional hearing a “partisan show trial [that] is a waste of time and taxpayer dollars.”

   Harf noted that Boehner said, “By subpoenaing the Secretary of State, Democrats have revealed how beholden they are to leftwing activist groups while stealing the Secretary’s time away from critical diplomatic missions.”

   After quoting Boehner, Harf added, “So what we would say is you don’t get to have different rules for different administrations… We shouldn’t play politics with Benghazi. Clearly, I think what we’re seeing now can be called nothing but that.”

   https://www.cbsnews.com/news/john-kerry-wont-comply-with-benghazi-subpoena-state-dept-says/

6. Denise Higgins
   May 7th, 2014 @ 6:30 am

   Why would Congress subpoena Kerry? he wasn’t SoS at the time of the Benghazi attack. Shouldn’t they still be questioning Hillary? Or can they not because she is no longer SoS?

7. Denise Higgins
   May 7th, 2014 @ 6:36 am

   0bama brings up his BC jokingly and his supporters see this as 0bama being honest and transparent instead of sneaky. Then they don’t do any research so very few of them are even aware that 0bama is using a stolen SSN.

8. RacerJim
   May 7th, 2014 @ 11:06 am

   Dear Orly Taitz,

   You have always had my deepest and unwavering respect and support for your efforts to get some legal authority to hold Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah accountable for his forged birth certificates, Selective Service Registration Form and stolen Social Security Number. That said…

   Allow me to suggest an alternate approach…getting a legal authority to hold 2008 Democratic Party of Hawaii Chairman Brian Schatz accountable for submitting an OCON to the Chief Elections Officer (“CEO”)of Hawaii which did not certify Obama )or Biden) as eligible “under provisions of the U.S. Constitution.” as required by Hawaii election law, 2008 CEO Kevin B. Cronin for allowing Obama’s name to be on Hawaii’s ballot nonetheless, and 2008 Democratic National Convention Chairperson Hillary Clinton for submitting a DNC OCON which certified Obama (and Biden) eligible “under provisions of the U.S. Constitution.” without having irrefutable evidence that Obama met the “Natural Born Citizen” criteria.

   Hope to see you at OAS!

Leave a Reply