We need to protect our votes this november. Remember, a year ago, the voting machines were being contracted out to a S. american company. what does that tell you. PPL have forgotten about that. We must insist on paper votes for every election this year and in 2012. We will never again have honest elections.

Answer:

Dear Rosemary,

at issue is not only the paper ballots, but also the machines counting the ballots. As those can be hacked, rigged, programmed with certain parameters. At issue is also lack of supervision of the count. We don’t know what they are counting: ballots that we filled out by us or ballots filled out by some thugs in Chicago or Mexico a few months ago. When Coleman lost in Minnesota, they had a whole car with ballots suddenly appear a few days after the election, god knows from where, god knows how. 

Unless and until there are ordinary citizens at the precincts actually counting the ballots, verifying the count, as people are filling those out, you always will have high likelihood of rigging in many different ways.

I watched the trends around the country. Anti establishment candidates were winning in KY, SC, NV, ME . Tea party backed candidates were winning. Look what happened yesterday in CA: all the tea party candidates lost badly and were kept at an artificial  25%-26% threshold.

My campaign manager is Scott Hart of Hart political consulting. He was some 20 years in politics, he is an attorney. We did everything. 300,000 e-newsletters went to registered Republicans. two batches of robocalls of 500,000 each batch. He analysed my race and felt that it is very close and I should have a slight edge. Even Adam Probolski, who is a local pro-establishment hack and hurt me by making terrible statements, was guessing that I should get at least 35% of the vote.

Look at Poizner race. Only a few days before the election Scott Rassmussen did a poll were Poizner was doing better  then Whitman against Brown. Scott Hart analysed his race and believed that the difference should be in single digits. There is no way in hell, that the most trusted polster in the country Scott Rasmussen had Poizner at par with Whitman just a few days before the election, and then Poizner is losing by nearly 40 %.

Look at lieutenant Governor race. Maldonado is a typical RINO. Most people voting in this primary – are tea party patriots. All of them hated Maldonado. He was pushing NWO (New World Order) agenda, prop 14 being part of it. How did he win?

Look at school superintendant races. Look at Atty Gen. Many were rooting for Eastman. A number of well known talk show hosts were promoting him, yet he lost.

Most telling is the race for Sheriff in OC. I can’t remember anybody saying that he is voting for Hutchins. I was at dozens of events. She didn’t even care to show up at any of the events of any groups. County was literally covered with signs “Hunt for sheriff”. You would be hard pressed to find one single sign for Hutchins, appointee of the establishment. There is no way in hell she won by such a big margin.

What is the common denominator between all of the people losing the election: all of them were against Amnesty, pro second amendment rights, pro Constitution, anti establishment. All over the country these candidates are winning and winning big, but yet they all lost big here. Look at the surveys of the public opinion. 60% of the population is supporting AZ law. If you look at the Republicans, voting in the primary, over 80% at least were pro AZ immigration law. Sheriff Joe Arpaio came here and endorsed Hunt and campaigned for him. There is no way in the environment where 80% of the voters support this most crucial issue, candidates, who were champions of this issue could lose all of their contests 2:1 or 3:1. No way in hell.

Now look at the people who won. Do you see a common thread? Even though I support women and I like Carly, she is a nice woman and she went through cancer, the fact of the matter remains the  same. All of these candidates stayed within the parameters of the controlled opposition. They all supported Amnesty, more gun control, which means taking of more of our economy and taking more of our Constitutional rights. Don’t get me wrong, I still prefer Republicans to Democrats, as Republicans seem to be more financially responsible, however this CA election was a clear and loud message from the oligarchy running the show: stay within the parameters that we allowed, or we will cream you and embarrass you, so you will never run again or if you try to run, people will perceive you as a loser. It was a message to anyone running  in future elections, if you dare to step outside the allowed parameters, we will cream you just like these guys in CA. It is very similar to what happened to me in GA. 20,000 sanctions were asserted not because representing members of the military and ask reasonable questions is really frivolous and sanction-able, not. It was a message to every attorney: we will cream you, if you dare to challenge the puppet that we cherry picked and put in power. Don’t you dare to endanger our rule, particularly with the members of the military. We want you quiet.

So at the end of the day you can stay within the parameters of the controlled opposition and do what is allowed, but then you only feed your ego, while the whole country is going down the drain, or you can stand up and be counted. One of the things that you can do, is pass a proposition, where ordinary citizens can be present at the precincts, where the ballots are counted, that assures that the balots are not replaced with pre-prepared ballots, where any rigging of the machines are not affecting the count. There is one slight problem: such proposition will need to pass in the environment of current way of counting, and here we go again…:-)

Orly