33 Responses to “emergency request for letters rogatory was sent to judge Malihi 1 minute before the end of the day in Atlanta”

1. Sam Sewell
   January 20th, 2012 @ 3:05 pm

   Sure wish I knew what that meant!

2. William Blasingame
   January 20th, 2012 @ 3:50 pm

   LOL me too.. i think it means all the paperwork from the GA judge needs to be sent to the Idiot Hawaii judge

3. art o
   January 20th, 2012 @ 5:39 pm

   I thought letters of rogatory only applied if another country was involved

4. Dana
   January 20th, 2012 @ 6:47 pm

   Sam, William, you have to click on the link above and read the document!

   It is easy to understand… I know it does not look like a link but hover over it and you will see it is.

5. Linda Steaveson
   January 20th, 2012 @ 7:11 pm

   Dictionary.com defines rogatory as: pertaining to asking or requesting: a rogatory commission.

6. Redd
   January 20th, 2012 @ 7:24 pm

   https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/georgia-judge-orders-obama-to-appear-in-court-for-hearing-on-attempt-to-keep-him-off-ballot/2012/01/20/gIQAsayeEQ_story.html

7. John_PUMA
   January 20th, 2012 @ 7:40 pm

   A formal written request made by one judicial body to another court in a different, independent jurisdiction that a witness who resides in that jurisdiction be examined through the use of interrogatories accompanying the request.

8. John_PUMA
   January 20th, 2012 @ 7:45 pm

   Which court requested it? Also just cause it is requested does not mean it will be accepted.

9. S. Daily Warren
   January 20th, 2012 @ 8:01 pm

   Letter Rogatory: A request by a court made of a foreign court in writing to secure the aid of a foreign court, backed by its power, in obtaining desired information in the form of a deposition by a person within the jurisdiction of the foreign court or to obtain the production of a record within the jurisdiction of such court. 23 Am J2d Dep. Section 23.
   While it is usual for a letter rogatory to be accompanied by written interrogatories, this is not essential, unless required by statute; in the absence of any such statutory provision, the testimony may be taken upon oral examination. The absence of written interrogatories may, however, affect the question whether the court in its discretion will honor the letters. Anno: 9 ALR 967m s, 108 ALR 384; 23 Am J2d Dep Section 23

   Taken from Ballentines Law Dictionary, “Letter Rogatory”

10. West Coast Carl
    January 20th, 2012 @ 8:38 pm

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_rogatory

    That will explain everything.

11. Bill Stork
    January 20th, 2012 @ 9:00 pm

    What the hell does that mean?

12. John
    January 20th, 2012 @ 11:19 pm

    In the next trial/hearing, Orly should invite Mike Huckabee to be a witness.

    Apparently he knows something that we don’t know:

    ” … During a Fox News appearance this evening, Mike Huckabee suggested that Mitt Romney, who has come under fire for refusing to immediately release his tax returns, respond by challenging President Obama to release his college application materials in order to “show whether he got any loans as a foreign student.”

    Speaking on The O’Reilly Factor, Huckabee said of Romney, “Let him make this challenge: ‘I’ll release my tax returns when Barack Obama releases his college transcripts and the copy of his admission records to show whether he got any loans as a foreign student. When he releases that, talk to me about my tax returns.’ …”

    See the full report and the video at
    https://mediamatters.org/blog/201201200016

13. Yoel
    January 21st, 2012 @ 12:42 am

    “Letters rogatory” means that the news from Georgia has caused Obama to become so frightened that he has soiled himself. OBAMA IS DEFINITELY A LIFE-LONG PATHOLOGICAL LIAR and A NARCISSISTIC MARXIST COWARD. OBAMA KNOWS VERY WELL THAT HIS LIES and FRAUD ARE GOING TO BE EXPOSED BY THE COURTS of GEORGIA. (NO, OBAMA DOES NOT POSSESS ANY IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION! HE IS MERELY A LOWLY PUBLIC SERVANT, HE IS NOT ROYALTY!)

14. The Last Patriot
    January 21st, 2012 @ 8:53 am

    BARI MALIK SHABAZZ WHO YO DADDY? NOT YOUR PLAY DADDY! YO MOMMA DADDAY! SNAP!!!

    ALLAHU AKBAR!

    EN SHALLAH!!!

    SHUKRAN!!!

15. Anthony
    January 21st, 2012 @ 9:42 am

    What are the chances that he will, for some reason or another, be given the “Nixon” pass with an executive pardon? However it happens this could place the very liberal party into the stone ages for quite some time as replacements for its current leaders will be a real up hill battle to regain the trust of “true” Americans

16. Larry
    January 21st, 2012 @ 6:28 pm

    I believe if they go after impeachment…that will acknowledge him as president,and all laws passed by him to be laws…the worst that will happen is he will be barred from elected office and set free(with the Supreme Justices that he appointed)…We need to go after him as a person that has stolen identy,fraud,and anything else we can and that will prove his presidency as a fraud and all he has done will be null and void.

17. Dansmith1954
    January 22nd, 2012 @ 9:34 pm

    @Larry…I’m not sure if a “ineligible” usurper can be impeached. Just about “any” Court can find Obama guilty of fraud, etc., and
    have him removed for crimes against the State.
    Obama’s “swearing in” was flubbed and re-done behind closed doors. Maybe Orly should demand to see a certified copy of Justice Roberts administering the Oath of Office. I’m curious as to “WHY” Our Congress has done nothing to investigate and/or uphold their Oath to Protect OUR CONSTITUTION! Thank goodness that Orly has pursued this matter. If Obama is a “no show”, the Judge has no choice but to find him “ineligible” or admission to estopple.
    Wat to Go Orly, you’re the BEST!

18. Carl Manning
    January 23rd, 2012 @ 10:17 pm

    If Obama’s a no-show and his records are not presented in court, I sure hope Judge Malihi grants default judgment. This will be Earth-shattering for the Obama Campaign. The DNC and their accomplices in the MSM will portray all of this as a Southern GOP racist witchhunt a la Clinton’s MonicaGate Impeachment trial. The Democrats (Globalist NWO/CFR Establishment)will then run Hillary/Billary in 2012 and win easily with the MSM’s help of course.

19. Chris
    January 24th, 2012 @ 7:26 am

    Is Arpaio going to show at the hearing?

20. Bloodless Coup
    January 26th, 2012 @ 6:33 pm

    Well the Judge alledgedly stated in front of several witnesses that he planned to declare a default judgement against Obama for his failure to appear..

    If the Judge fails to do so, I would think that any contrary decision could be used as grounds for an appeal. Afterall the Judge clearly stated his intention and then he conducted the hearing accordingly.

    In addition, a default judgement is usally a forgone conclusion whenever there is a failure to appear on the part of the defendant or the plantiff.

    You can be darn sure that Obama’s Lawyer would be demanding a default judgement if the plaintiffs failed to appear and make their case.

21. ken
    January 26th, 2012 @ 7:09 pm

    I think what it means is that Obama is a guilty coward…

22. ken
    January 26th, 2012 @ 7:21 pm

    In regards to Impeachment aknowledging him as eligible
    So what happens if Obama is allowed to finish a full term..does that not also finalize his eligibilty?
    kinda like case law or however someone can spin it..

    I mean if it has already been unsurped then does the rule still have any standing?

23. Mark Galperin
    January 26th, 2012 @ 8:04 pm

    The “commission” or “letters rogatory” procedure is the process required in a state court action to be able to obtain the issuance and service of an out-of-state subpoena.

24. Donna
    January 26th, 2012 @ 11:00 pm

    We all need to go to DC and DEMAND his removal!along with all of his appointees!!!!

25. vadaryl
    January 27th, 2012 @ 5:09 am

    Orly,

    If this was sent on Jan. 20th what happened to it during the hearing yesterday.

26. Thundertone
    January 27th, 2012 @ 5:14 am

    Close all the loopholes and convict this bastard and make it stick…Americans will then see the criminal he is and take down the co-conspirators after they nail his ass to the wall!!

27. vadaryl
    January 27th, 2012 @ 5:20 am

    Orly,

    Why didn’t Sherrif Joe show up yesterday? I thought he got a Subpeonea.

28. Redd
    January 27th, 2012 @ 6:01 am

    Orly “ably presented her evidence”…
    https://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/georgia_ballot_challenge_obama_walks_on_by.html

29. Stephen T
    January 27th, 2012 @ 6:43 am

    You cannot impeach a president that was never legitimate without giving tacit acceptance to his legitimacy. An arrest is more appropriate.

30. taino21
    January 27th, 2012 @ 8:47 am

    How can you impeach someone that is not POTUS?
    If these politicians that are in congress, both Dem. and Rep. with all their college degrees are going to tell me the do not know what a natural born citizen is they are all a bunch liars. How about for beginners have him charge with treason and under RICCO.

    David Ramsay (April 2, 1749 to May 8, 1815) was an American physician, patriot, and historian from South Carolina and a delegate from that state to the Continental Congress in 1782-1783 and 1785-1786. He was the Acting President of the United States in Congress Assembled. He was one of the American Revolution’s first major historians. A contemporary of Washington, Ramsay writes with the knowledge and insights one acquires only by being personally involved in the events of the Founding period. In 1785 he published History of the Revolution of South Carolina (two volumes), in 1789 History of the American Revolution (two volumes), in 1807 a Life of Washington, and in 1809 a History of South Carolina (two volumes).
    n his 1789 article, Ramsay first explained who the “original citizens” were and then defined the “natural born citizens” as the children born in the country to citizen parents. He said concerning the children born after the declaration of independence, “[c]itizenship is the inheritance of the children of those who have taken part in the late revolution; but this is confined exclusively to the children of those who were themselves citizens….” He added that “citizenship by inheritance belongs to none but the children of those Americans, who, having survived the declaration of independence, acquired that adventitious character in their own right, and transmitted it to their offspring….” He continued that citizenship “as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776….”

31. FreeperWatch
    January 27th, 2012 @ 8:53 am

    Thanks to Irion and Hatfield, President Obama’s Short and Long Form Birth Certificates have been entered into the record, and they both agreed to concede the fact that the copies submitted were genuine copies. Now The President doesn’t need to respond to this circus at all, as two documents proving he was born on US Soil have been shown in open court. Orly’s case was finished before she even stood up yesterday. Thanks for making t easy Irion and Hatfield.

32. Joe Blow
    January 27th, 2012 @ 9:43 am

    Obama Birth Announcement Forged http://www.hoaxofthecentury.com/ForgedObama1.htm

33. OustTheO's
    January 28th, 2012 @ 6:03 pm

    Freeper, what about your statement makes Obama a “Natural Born Citizen?”

Leave a Reply