Draft of a motion to be submitted in Hi

Posted on | April 8, 2012 | 10 Comments

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Ph 949-683-5411 fax949-766-7603

Orly.Taitz@gmail.com

CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT HONOLULU, HAWAII

)

DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ                                                 )

PLAINTIFF

)

V                                                                                    )                      CIVIL 11-1-1731-08

)      HON. RHONDA NISHIMURA PRESIDING

LORETTA FUDDY IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS   )

DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH       )

STATE OF HAWAII,                                                      )

DR. ALVIN T. ONAKA,                                                  )

)

IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS                                    )

THE REGISTRAR, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH           )

STATE OF HAWAII                                                        )

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW INFORMATION

Comes now Plaintiff Orly  Taitz, hereinafter Taitz and  is seeking a disclosure under UIPA not of a long form birth certificate for Barack Obama, as it does not exist, but  rather access to the book of birth record for 1961 and microfilm of the same to show that indeed a document posted by Obama on line on White House.gov is not listed among original 1961 birth certificates in the book of records and is not part of the original microfilm of such records.

Argument

Rule 60, Relief From Judgment or Order

(b) Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence Fraud, etc.

On motion and upon such terms as are iust, the court may relieve a party or a party’s legal

representative from a final judgment, order. or proceeding for the following reasons: (1)

mistake. inadvertence, surprise. or excusable neglect: (2) newly  discovered evidence

due diligence which could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);

(l) fraud (whether heretofore  denominated intrinsic  or extrinsic). misrepresentation, or other

misconduct of an adverse party: (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied

released. or discharged. or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or

otherwise vacated. or it is no Ionger equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason Justifying relief from the operation other  judgment. The

motion shall be made within a reasonable time and for reasons (l ). (2). and (3) Dot more than

one year after the judgment. Order or proceeding was entered or taken A motion under this

subdivision (b) does not affect the finality of a judgment or suspend its operation Hawaii Rules

of Civil Procedure Rule 60.

Plaintiff herein, submits a transcript of the administrative proceedings in Atlanta Georgia, where seven witnesses provided admissible, competent testimony, showing that the alleged copy of Obama’s birth certificate is a computer generated forgery. They also testified that the Social Security number used by Obama, is fraudulently obtained and represents a number issued in 1977 to another individual, an elderly resident of the State of Connecticut, who was born in 1890.Exhibit 1.  On March 1, 2012, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa county, Arizona, held a press conference, where he announced results of a six month investigation, where he confirmed the findings provided by Taitz. Taitz provides herein Exhibit 2, Transcript of the press conference by sheriff Arpaio and Exhibit 3, an actual Video tape of the January 26, 2012 administrative hearing in Atlanta Georgia and March 1, 2012 press conference by Sheriff Arpaio in Phoenix, Arizona as well as an Affidavit of authenticity.

The result of the investigation by sheriff Arpaio clearly show that the document is question is a computer generated forgery.

Investigator Zullo:

[32:11] “The fact that the Registrar’s Stamp and the April 25th Date Stamp appear

separately and independently of each other on separate links drew our attention to

the fact that they resided on separate independent layers. The fact that the Date

and Registrar’s stamp were linked and layered in this fashion brings us to the

conclusion that they were brought in from unknown sources and placed in the long

form birth certificate document released by Barack Obama to give the appearance of

legal certification.

[32:40] “Also troubling about the April 25th stamp and the Registrar’s Stamp is the

fact that both stamps can be lifted cleanly off the document and moved about the

birth certificate in one solid piece. It should be noted that none of the self proclaimed

computer experts claiming to be able to replicate the layers in Obama’s

long form birth certificate has been able to replicate this effect with the April 25th

Date Stamp and the Registrar’s stamp.

What Taitz is seeking is an opposite of  what is usually done, it might seem like an outside of the box request, however it is perfectly logical and reasonable in light of the sworn testimony of the January 26, 2012 hearing in Farrar et al v Obama Exhibit 1, 3 and in light of the confirmation of such findings made by sheriff Joe Arpaio Exhibit 2, 3.

Aforementioned findings show that the alleged copy of Obama’s long form birth certificate posted by Obama on line, on WhiteHouse.gov is a computer generated forgery. Investigator Mike Zullo, who assisted sheriff Joe Arpaio, testified that this alleged birth certificate never existed in paper form. Layering of the document showed that the signature of the registrar and the date stamp reside on a different layer, that those were cut and pasted from different documents.

What does it mean?  Pure and simple, it means that the Registrar of the department of Health Alvin Onaka and the Director of Health Loretta Fuddy are simply criminals, who have been complicit aiding and abetting Obama in the biggest case of elections fraud and forgery.

Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo confirmed findings by Felicito Papa, who has over 10 years of use of Adobe Illustrator and similar programs and who is a graduate of Indiana institute of Technology. Exhibit 1

If law enforcement found that the stamp of the registrar was brought from another document, it means that defendant Onaka knew that he did not certify the document in question. This is a case of national importance. When Onaka saw Obama’s press conference on TV he knew that Obama, former White House counsel Bob Bauer and others involved were simply lying, were defrauding the nation. He knew that he never certified this document. His silence constituted fraud.

Defendant Fuddy went even further.  If the signature of the Registrar was brought from another document, Fuddy knew that she did not copy the original document and did not give it to Onaka to stamp. Obama and Bauer presented a letter supposedly signed by Fuddy. Either Fuddy knew that the letter signed by her was a forgery as well or she wrote a letter and was complicit not only in fraud by being silent, but actively complicit by writing a letter to Obama, claiming that she personally copied a document.

Previously this court denied the  motion for reconsideration using an unusual interpretation of the disclosure statute. While common sense tells you that the legislature has privacy statutes to protect information of one who wants it to be claimed private, not one, like Obama who is pointing the alleged records on the internet for millions of people to see. Now however Taitz is not aasking to review the photocopy of the alleged birth certificate as according to Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo such document never existed, it was created on computer sometimes recently. now Taitz is simply demanding verification that the document does not exist.

At this point the court does not have any excuse or any justification for denying the motion. Taitz is not asking the court to disclose any document, as it was shown that the document does not exist. Taitz is asking this court to allow for her and her forensic document experts to examine 1961 book of records and microfilm in order to simply confirm the law enforcement findings.

For example, if Taitz were to request such a confirmation for herself, it would not be an infringement on anybody’s privacy rights to simply confirm that Taitz was not born in Hawaii and there is no long form birth certificate for her.

Similarly, as Arpaio, Zullo, Papa, and Sampson have shown, there is no original long form birth certificate for Obama, it does not exist, it is a computer generated forgery posted by Obama on line. If this court will refuse such a simple request, this court will become criminally complicit in ObamaForgeryGate as well.

It is not a secret that Hawaii is a stronghold for the Democratic party. Lately the state government was run as an incestual little clique, with the Governor being an old friend of Obama’s family, the Attorney General being a fellow Occi grad and an Obama fan and Deputy Attorney General in charge of the Health Department Nagamine being married to Obama family attorney Todao Nagamine. However, even in this “all stays in the family” environment there is a limit at which a court of law has to stop and balk. Honorable Rhonda Nishimura cannot become one of individuals actively aiding and abetting forgery and fraud. Time came for this court to state “Enough is enough, up to here. I will not risk being thrown off the bench and going to prison to cover up for Obama’s forgery”.

REQUEST TO RULE ON THE PLEADINGS WITHOUT AN ORAL ARGUMENT

Plaintiff is a resident of California  and travel to Hawaii is costly. Plaintiff travelled to Hawaii 5 times on this case and is greatly concerned that prior oral arguments were scheduled with preconceived decisions in mind and the magnitude of the issue was simply ignored. Statute 338 was interpreted in a fashion that defied logic and made sense only for the purpose of keeping the truth hidden.  Due to these concerns Plaintiff is requesting a ruling on the pleadings. New evidence of fraud and forgery committed in relation to Obama’s alleged copy of his birth certificate is overwhelming, it is staggering. There is no excuse or justification in not allowing to open the books simply to confirm that the document in question is not authentic and was not created in 1961, as claimed by Obama.

If this court decides not to grant this motion on the pleadings based on the evidence provided, there is nothing the Plaintiff can add in the oral argument, in order to change the mind of the court.

A copy of this motion is being forwarded to the US House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, Oversight committee, Inspector General of the Department of Justice, Public Integrity Unit of the Department of Justice, Commission on the Human Rights Defenders of the United Nations and the Inter-American commission on Human Rights, as Plaintiff is greatly concerned by the fact that the Human rights and Constitutional rights of 311 million American citizens were infringed upon by criminality of some in the government of the state of Hawaii and unwillingness of the office of the Attorney General of Hawaii and the Judiciary of the state of Hawaii to address this issue on the merits and prosecute Director of Health Fuddy and Registrar of the Department of Health Onaka for their criminal complicity in the biggest case of elections fraud in the history of this nation and in the usurpation of the US Presidency by Barack Obama, an individual with forged birth certificate, forged selective service certificate and a stolen Social Security number.

Conclusion

Plaintiff is respectfully requesting

1. In light of the sworn testimonies in Farrar v Obama( 2012 CV 211398 Administrative court of GA)  and announcement of forgery by sheriff Joe Arpaio to reverse prior ruling and order the defendants to allow inspection of the 1961 book of birth records and  microfilm for the purpose of confirmation and verification that indeed there is no original  genuine 1961 long form birth certificate for Barack Obama

2. Sua sponte order deputy attorney General Nagamine or another specially appointed attorney from the office of the Attorney General to conduct criminal investigation and prosecution of the findings of forgery in Obama’s alleged copy of the birth certificate and investigate and prosecute all the individuals involved in that matter.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

CERTIFICATION

I, Lila Dubert, attest that I am over 18 years old, not a party to this case and I served on 04.09.2012  a copy of this complaint on the defendants through their attorney Deputy Attorney General Nagamine.

/s/ Lila Dubert

Comments

• Search for:
• Tweet

• EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !

• EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy

• Evidence on Barack Obama

  Obama File with Exhibits
  Affidavit of Paul Irey
  Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
  Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
  Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
  Obama file Exhibits 9-13
  Obama file Exhibits 14-21
  Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
  Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and Congress

• RSS Feed: Subscribe for Free RSS Feed

  

• ---

  PETITION TO CONGRESS:
  Ban importation of 200,000 Syrian migrants into the US

  

  ---

• Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day

  

• URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS

• OrlyTaitzEsq.com

  • Untitled

• TAITZ REPORT

  Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE
• 

• Official Facebook

  
  

• Recent Posts

  • (no title)

• IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!

  Historic DVD Now Available! DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling. --------- To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.

• Advertisement / Sponsors

  
  29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
  Ste 100
  Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
  orly.taitz @gmail. com
  (949) 766-7687
  
  
  --------------------------------------
  
  Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
  --------------------------------------
  
  

  Bumper Sticker
  $9.99 thru PayPal

  --------------------------------------
  
  
  --------------------------------------

  Orly Taitz Photo Collections

  
  

• May 2024

  M	T	W	T	F	S	S
  		1	2	3	4	5
  6	7	8	9	10	11	12
  13	14	15	16	17	18	19
  20	21	22	23	24	25	26
  27	28	29	30	31

• Pages

  • #409755 (no title)
  • …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
  • …Grinols Subpoenas
  • ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
  • .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
  • 1. Judd v Obama
  • 2. Farrar v Obama
  • 3. Taitz v Sebelius
  • 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
  • 5. Taitz v Astrue
  • 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
  • 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
  • Videos
  • Video: Orly before NH Election Committee