Certified mail IN, LA, GA
Posted on | February 9, 2012 | 1 Comment
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
One Response to “Certified mail IN, LA, GA”
Leave a Reply
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.com
TAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available! DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling. --------- To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee
February 9th, 2012 @ 5:47 pm
I love you Orly and praise you for every effort you have made, and continue to make, on behalf of U.S. citizens everywhere. This much you have done unselfishly for America, and what is amazing is that you yourself were born in a different country!
Americans have let you carry the banner that we have not even had the courage or gumption to carry. I am ashamed of us for that. And what about all of the expense(s) (Not to mention your time, which is money) you have incurred to do so? Each of us owes you a deep debt of gratitude and repayment… Wake up, America!
In that regard, I would like to help you carry on until the victory is won. So please let me know, other than giving money (Which I don’t have at the moment) what I can do. I live in Costa Mesa. Among other things, I am a Sr. Editor, writer and proofreader. Let me know…
I have one question: In the recent GA proceedings, it seems (I ask you to correct me if I am wrong) that the conferring of citizenship by an underage mother (At the time of the O birth) was not made to be a credible, standout issue.
This was the law when O was born, and taken in context with his father NOT being a U. S. citizen (Also well-documented and accepted as being true), how is it that this important fact keeps getting kicked to the side when it comes to the rule of law in proving this case?
At the very least, it can be agreed upon that Malihi totally avoided this fact in his ruling, even if he knew beforehand of its existence.
If this is indeed the case, why wasn’t Malihi (And all related presiding judges) firmly reminded of the fact that, assuming (Although I don’t believe it for a second!) O was actually born in the USA, his mother was too young (Being only age 18 and also a fact fully documented) by a year to confirm citizenship upon him? I know, 2nd question…
I truly do not mean for this to sound harsh, but why was this (And at times in this and similar cases, other crucial facts) unquestionable fact of record momentarily forgotten or set aside, as if we are so aggressive that we fight like animals for the truth, using haphazard, unorganized facts here and there to prove the case only partially as a result, and then passively have to accept (For the moment at least, upon ruling) any answer the judge (Himself having been born on different soil – in a case such as this, can’t natural-born judges be demanded on the grounds of impartiality?) chooses to hand out?
OK, that’s 3 questions, but I, like everyone, am sick of seeing us be so close to victory, only for them to easily escape the truth by an illicit (On its face having NO credibility or standing as regards our case on its merits) loophole.
Now we have another PRECEDENT to deal with; however misinformed and wrong it is, the fact remains that it is on the books, with the blessing of the GA SOS. Amazing!!!
The Os are like slippery eels – they themselves know that they are idiots and still, they are constantly laughing at us for being so gullible.
Why can’t we, as citizens of these great United States, just agree once and for all on what the facts are, and not give up until we have proven our case beyond ANY shadow of doubt, to the extent that they have no other option but to accept the facts and throw the usurper bum out? I know, the fourth question…
I just don’t get it – they are playing us like a fiddle, not even showing up in court to answer a subpoena, spitting in our faces, on the face of The Constitution and our Courts of Law.
We are intelligent citizens and love our country; we need to be ORGANIZED in our approach to prove our case – we need to be as ONE, if we are going to make any REAL progress; in agreement on the FACTS that are the most compelling, that prove the (OUR) case that O is ineligible to be POTUS under ANY circumstance, based only upon the TRUTH, the WHOLE TRUTH and nothing but THE TRUTH. JUST THE FACTS, madam or sir!
WHAT IS WRONG WITH US (Final question)?