On July 13, in presence of 50 witnesses judge Carter stated that his court had jurisdiction, now after pressure it suddenly lost jurisdiction? What kind of system of Justice is it?
Posted on | October 30, 2009 | 6 Comments
From:
To:
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Hi Orly,
I was so disappointed to hear about the dismissal. I received a phone call a few minutes ago from a friend of mine in Newport Beach. He knows that I have been following the trial, and he called to tell me that he had just run into an old friend of his, David Carter, in the donut shop in Laguna. I asked him if he meant Judge David Carter, and he said “yes”.
He said that from what the judge said, he got the feeling that he did not think you were wrong, but he didn’t feel that the court had the jurisdiction to decide on this. He also told my friend that he thought it would be appealed, but did not think it would do any good. I asked this gentleman to call you, but he said that wouldn’t be appropriate since the Judge is a friend.
Do you think we can get to enough congressmen and senators to do something?
Keep up the fight, a lot of people are backing you.
Pat Levy
Comments
6 Responses to “On July 13, in presence of 50 witnesses judge Carter stated that his court had jurisdiction, now after pressure it suddenly lost jurisdiction? What kind of system of Justice is it?”












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

October 30th, 2009 @ 1:48 pm
CARTER IN A NUTSHELL: Expanded Orly Taitz default judgment case against CANDIDATE Obama for fraud into a Presidential Removal case against PRESIDENT Obama (promising a trial), but then ruled the Court lacks said Presidential Removal authority, not only dismissing the Judge-expanded Presidential Removal case (reneging on the trial), but throwing out Orly’s Candidate fraud case as well — all this on a red herring that Orly’s case was filed 1/20/09 after Obama was sworn in on 1/20/09 despite Obama was sworn in on 1/21/09 and despite the Orly-alleged fraud was committed by Candidate Obama prior to becoming President and for which there is no Presidential immunity in any case. Thus Judge Carter set up and knocked down his own straw man, and misstated fact and law to bury Orly’s actual case. Pretty nifty!!!
October 30th, 2009 @ 2:25 pm
No jurisdiction, Judge? What a hoot, and to think the defence’s justification plea for dismissal is credible? What’s plain to me is how you attorneys, moreso, justify avoiding the law rather than enforcing it. No jurisdiction, Judge? More like, no accountability.
October 31st, 2009 @ 4:02 am
To Pat Levy: I think Judge Carter was being disingenuous to your friend. It sounds like Carter didn’t have the balls to tell your friend what he really thinks about Orly – as he so generously shared in writing his dismissal. If Carter REALLY thinks Orly was not wrong, then why sling such hateful words attacking her professinal competence and character? Sounds to me like, in addition to lacking gonads to grant discovery, Carter also lacks the guts and personal integrity to level with people about his true opinions.
October 31st, 2009 @ 12:03 pm
Orly are you eligible to go quo warranto in DC District Court?
November 1st, 2009 @ 9:54 am
no, I am not licensed in DC, neither is Donofrio