Keyes Transcript 10-5-09
Posted on | October 27, 2009 | 11 Comments
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
11 Responses to “Keyes Transcript 10-5-09”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
October 27th, 2009 @ 7:45 pm
Great job Orly! Absolutely tremendous effort on your part, thank you!
October 27th, 2009 @ 7:53 pm
The defense argument is that this issue is a political argument and thus the court can not hear the case. Mr West then concedes “I believe that the courts could have some jurisdiction over the question of whether a candidate is qualified to be on the ballot”. It was gracious of him to allow “some jurisdiction” and then go on to argue who should decide that jurisdiction as if another branch of government had the power to limit the amont of jurisdiction the court should actually have.
Never has any constitutional rule, observable by the court, been removed of the courts view thus preventing review of its application. This question is within observing what has or has not been done, as in whether there is conclusive evidence that what has not been yet done would likely require doing to be constitutionally legal. The content of Obamas original long form birth certificate document is as yet unknown to any of the three branches of government where it ought to be discoverable under FOIA and is actually the object of the defense to not have it discovered, that proves the article two section one requirement has not been fulfilled.
The FOIA argument of the defense is dishonest. Their client has asserted executive power blocking any FOIA discovery. To state that any amount of refiling might somehow be productive one might as well also state “if they find a legal loophole before we close it”.
How can a requirement be met without presenting anything legally recognizable as proof ?
How can that unseen proof be determined to be only reviewable by some other entity when it can not even be disclosed what the content is that would satisfy the rules for that determination to even be made?
The document itself must present itself for the satisfaction of the rule before any question of the rules application on that document can be made.
October 27th, 2009 @ 9:11 pm
Dr. Orly, Very important On O’Reilly about 10 minutes ago he had your case and you on the show about judge Land and how he sanctioned 20,000 dollars for frivolus charges. The program did not tell the truth. Please ASAP get in touch with Fox so you can tell them the truth. They cannot get away with this!
October 27th, 2009 @ 9:13 pm
Orly;
Again I want to thank you for your work and dedication.
After watching the Bill O’Reilly Factor and coming close to losing my dinner, I have had enough of the
most watched blow hard. Bill O’Reilly was again, trashing you and your efforts and playing up the
$20,000 fine [sanction] against you.
Bill O’Reilly should rename his show to the O’Really Factor, as a bogus journalist and admitted quote ‘Commentator’
who comments on current issues with no legal standing as as BS artist.
For Pinheads and Patriots, Bill O’Reilly is a pinhead. With nothing to support his position concerning Obama’s citizenship, his forged COLB,
I have e-mailed Bill O’Reilly and sent documented evidence that the COLB is a forgery – plain and simple. But he not only refuses to listen, but
attacks those that have the evidence and mocks those who’s efforts are to the country and the Constitution.
Which COLB is real Bill O’Reilly? There have been three versions of the Hawaiian one posted? So which one?
Why hasn’t The State of Hawaii confirmed they even issues one?
I have the e-mails from the State of Hawaii that even prove that version #3 is forgery.
Patriot Orly, no words can express the thank you for fighting this tyranny taken place in our government.
I would debate Bill O’Really any day and put him in his place. A no nothing blow-hard bag of wind.
Listen to his dribble, fair and balanced, BS. But all he wants is you everyone to buy his crap!
I already placed his picture on my doormat, thank the weather that it is getting some good use.
syc1959
nobarack08.wordpress.com
youtube.com/syc1959
October 27th, 2009 @ 9:33 pm
Orly, while you probably already know this, for the benefit of other readers — particularly those critical of Judge Carter’s giving you a hard time on Oct 5 — he seems to have had a purpose; he’s certainly laid down all the markers you’ll need, you’ve met, and which will enable your case to move forward surviving attack from Team Obama.
In that sense, Oct 5 was a very positively productive day!
October 27th, 2009 @ 10:38 pm
O’Reilly also called the case nuts and did not even mention that the case has been appealed. As of tonight, I no longer watch O’Reilly.
Thanks Ms Taitz for all that you are doing.
October 27th, 2009 @ 11:55 pm
Thank you Orly for putting this in. I would have loved to have been there in the courtroom! Getting bits and pieces of it off the internet was nothing like being able to read what happened from start to finish. Thanks again. Great case!
October 28th, 2009 @ 2:52 am
Duly elected, !!!NOT!!!
Orly,
I read the 10-5-09 transcript. You are a lioness and at times a fire breathing one too. I bet the judge didn’t have to shave for a few days after hearing some of your excellent and fiery arguments. :-))
Judge Carter seems very uncomfortable with the prospect of removing a sitting President from office and is taking great pains to make sure your case is heard on sound legal footings. Once the cat is out of the bag, the damage to Obama’s credibility as a human being is irreversible.
Given a full Discovery and Finding of Fact, what is the least Remedy the judge could apply in the case of massive fraud by Obama? I can think of only one answer. Declare Obama an ineligible fraud and his election null and void. Criminal proceedings will be separate, depending on what is found to be true.
October 28th, 2009 @ 5:26 am
Judge Carter has the basis of this case ALL WRONG !!! He doesn’t understand the difference between NATURAL BORN an NATIVE BORN. From the transcript :
The second thing is, is that federal law at the
time required Mr. Obama’s mother to be a resident continuously in the United States for five years after age in order to convey her citizenship if the child was not born in the United States. So the issue is if the child was
born in Mombasa, in what was then —
THE COURT: Just a moment. There’s the interesting point. Bear with me for a moment.
The law got changed, didn’t it?
MR. KREEP: Yes, Your Honor.
THE COURT: So therefore, depending upon the
Congress, we can change the constitutional right to bePresident?
MR. KREEP: No, Your Honor.
THE COURT: It appears to me that Congress did.
——–
No, Judge Carter , Congress DID NOT do that. The law was changed regarding CITIZENSHIP, NOT NATURAL BORN status, which is teh requirement for the Presidency !!!!
October 28th, 2009 @ 5:44 am
Thank you for posting this document.
After reading and re-reading everything that was said, I come away somewhat disappointed that two very important issues were not even discussed:
1) The intent of the U.S. Constitution’s Natural Born Citizen requirement was to avoid ‘divided loyalties’. There has never been an explanation from Obama as to why he supported his cousin Odinga in Kenya – especially since Odinga was aligned with Radical Islam and responsible for killing many innocent Christians there.
2) There was also no mention of the Nancy Pelosi controversy over two versions of the ‘Certification of Nomination’ for Obama. Apparently forty-nine (49) of these signed and notarized copies did not contain “in accordance with the Constitution” wording, as did the only copy sent to the state of Hawaii.
These two arguments seem central to the case. In particular, Kreep was wrong to ascertain that Biden would step up if Obama is found to be ineligible. If Obama is not ‘duly elected’ or ‘legally elected per the Constitution’, why would his choice of V.P. stand. And if Pelosi is guilty of election fraud, she cannot step up either.
This is a Constitutional Crisis that will require an orderly and well thought out sequence of events to take place.
If Judge Carter is right and most of our politicians are honorable people, then why have they remained silent all this time? Once confronted with the reality that this greatest of all frauds is real, will they be able to set things back on the right path?
If Judge Carter is wrong about the extent of corruption in our current government, then we the people have a massive toxic clean-up on our hands. We need to start planning for this now and we need to avoid the usual closed-door, back-room agreements, and corrupt political solutions of the past.
Judge Carter is a good man. A great American by all accounts, but as Obama has apologized to the rest of the world – as good a man as he may be, thinking that America is the only place in the world where corruption does not reign supreme might be somewhere between naive and arrogant.
Still, I hope he is right about the inherent goodness inside all of us. How we handle this crisis will determine the future of our children, and our children’s children.
October 28th, 2009 @ 8:54 am
I tried to bring more points, including these, but judge Carter stated that I can’t speak more. Interestingly, he tried to pull more out of Kreep and West, enen though they didn’t have much to say