Posted on | October 30, 2009 | 1 Comment
tp |
Submitted on 2009/10/30 at 3:05pm
Carter = Grow a SPINE, you hypocrite! |
1 |
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
One Response to “”
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.com
TAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available! DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling. --------- To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee
October 30th, 2009 @ 6:13 pm
<>
——————-
I see that we have someone talented in the advertising business. May we draw on his expertise to develop a “handout” or something that we could send on the web … it could go viral, that would COMPARE Judge Carter’s language at the FIRST hearing in September, with his REVERSAL of this week. The change of HEART can, most likely, be attributed to the fact that he had a full month to be worked over by the defense attorneys. They even got one of their sympathizers hired to WORK IN THE OFFICE of the Judge, f’gosh sakes!
Has anyone else observed the MOST inappropriate “judicial” language being used by BOTH Judges Carter and Lamb? I’ll guess that neither of them in their history as judges EVER wrote or spoke with such disdain for the rights of either a defending or plaintiff attorney. IMO, the “tone” can only be attributed to “some outside influence”.
Or, could it be that both Judges wanted their denials to be so outrageous that the case(s)could easily qualify for submission to the Supreme Court?
Again, IMO, the judges err in “thinking” that these cases have an intent (as opposed to a consequence) of impeaching a president. As I, a layman, follow the proceedings, I can see that all efforts have been directed as opening up the records so the truth can be known. With the TRUTH exposed, it’s then up to the Congress to do what they will, or, will NOT do.
“We the People” will then know how to vote for our Senators and Representatives at the next elections based on how they individually responded to the truth.
So far, the judiciary in their so-called “according to the Constitution” responses have totally abrogated the concept of “checks and balances” that the founders so carefully authored by evading their mandated Constitutional authority. That’s my “take” on it anyway.
“Ye SHALL know the truth and the TRUTH WILL set you free” — a Law of Nature, if you will.