Grinols v Electoral college update, filed opposition
Posted on | March 4, 2013 | 23 Comments
Grinols Report of Technical failure of ECF
Grinols opposition to motion to Dismiss filed
Activity in Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al Notice – Other
|
1:43 PM (14 minutes ago)
 |
|
||
|
||||
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
U.S. District Court
Eastern District of California – Live System
Notice of Electronic Filing
| Case Name: | Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al |
| Case Number: | 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD |
| Filer: | |
| Document Number: | 81 |
Docket Text: NOTICE of CM/ECF Technical Failure on 3/1/2013 by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.. [RECEIVED in paper on 3/4/2013] (Donati, J)
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Edward A Olsen , GOVT     edward.olsen@usdoj.gov, karen.james@usdoj.gov, monica.lee@usdoj.gov, teisha.stogsdill@usdoj.gov
George Michael Waters     george.waters@doj.ca.gov, lydia.sandoval@doj.ca.gov
Orly Taitz   & nbsp orly.taitz@gmail.com
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1064943537 [Date=3/4/2013] [FileNumber=6010332-0] [Activity in Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al Opposition to Motion
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Eastern District of California – Live System Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 3/4/2013 at 1:45 PM PST and filed on 3/4/2013
Docket Text: OPPOSITION by plaintiffs to [73] MOTION to DISMISS. [RECEIVED in paper on 3/4/2013 pursuant to [81] Notice of CM/ECF Technical Failure] (Donati, J) 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to: The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
23 Responses to “Grinols v Electoral college update, filed opposition”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
March 4th, 2013 @ 2:27 pm
Orly, you need someone to moderate the website, so we can see Comments sooner. just give that person limited access.
Also, I can be that person.
March 4th, 2013 @ 2:42 pm
What does this mean Obama wants to dismiss a default judgement?
March 4th, 2013 @ 2:45 pm
Dude orly is doing a great job and if I find out someone else is running this site and not her ill never come back
March 4th, 2013 @ 2:51 pm
So Orly, I Don’t get it? What ever happened
with the SCOTUS case??? Clerk of Stay Redmond Barnes sends you back 5 packets and doesn’t go to jail either for Obstructing justice???Should patriotic americans just forget about that as well??
This is Outrageous
March 4th, 2013 @ 6:25 pm
We must end this junta now.
March 4th, 2013 @ 6:50 pm
When this case finally breaks, and as I heard you explained many times, the Watergate scandal would seem like an small sewage puddle, when the country realizes the magnitude of the corruption, that you were able to bring to the scrutiny of the law, and the final removal of BHO from the Oval Office.
March 4th, 2013 @ 7:09 pm
I would like to know what happenned at SCOTUS on 2/28/13.
March 4th, 2013 @ 7:10 pm
I would like to know what happenned at SCOTUS on 2/28/13.
March 4th, 2013 @ 8:16 pm
Orders pending for 2/19/2013, case 12A606 is still pending resolution by the Court.
This does not vogue well for BHO. Case, 12A606, is just one a of a handful of the more than 500 cases reviewed on 2/15/2013 under the SCOTUS Conference.
March 4th, 2013 @ 8:19 pm
In looking at more than 500 cases reviewed on 2/15/2013, and posted under Order List, case 12A606 is one of the very few that Certoriari have not been denied by the SCOTUS as of this moment.
March 5th, 2013 @ 8:31 am
Please add comment so we can understand what is going on. It does not need to be long. One sentence explaination!
Thank you.
May the power continue to be with you!
March 5th, 2013 @ 8:43 am
I wonder why the American people don’t have more visibility into what the Supreme Court is doing. They seem to be doing everything behind closed doors. They don’t explain their actions. They are not visible. That isn’t right in a free and open society.
The Order List of 2/19/2013 has the following sublists – Orders In Pending Cases, Appeal – Jurisdiction Noted, Certiorari Granted, Certiorary Denied, Habeus Corpus Denied, Mandamus Denied, Rehearings Denied, Attorney Discipline. 12A606 Noonan v. Bowen is listed in the Orders In Pending Cases sublist. What does that mean? How does one know what is happening with the case? What was the order?
Looking at the shear number of cases that get appealed to the Supreme court, it appears to me that the size of the United States population has far outgrown the judiciary. We could use a few more levels in the hierarchy of courts and many more upper-level appeals courts. It’s time to redesign the judiciary. It has become outdated and overwhelmed.
March 5th, 2013 @ 1:37 pm
If Obama is in default, his motion must be stricken under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f)(2). Then it’s CHECKMATE!
March 5th, 2013 @ 4:00 pm
It’s just my opinion, but I think they’ve put case 12A606 on the backburner, waiting till his term is over, when they can then permanently shelve it, unresolved. In the meantime, everyone thinks they are still reviewing it, but in reality, they are just avoiding making any decision at all. I hope I’m wrong.
March 5th, 2013 @ 4:27 pm
Adam: Dr Orly is the owner of this site…and she does the moderating, as well.
…………
If THE MAN would step up…we could save this AMERICA!
March 5th, 2013 @ 4:29 pm
Adam: Dr Orly is the owner of this site…and she does the moderating, as well.
…………
If THE MAN would step up…we could save this AMERICA!
March 5th, 2013 @ 5:58 pm
A job opening for Clerk of the court…
it is at the bottom of the web page.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/
March 5th, 2013 @ 8:56 pm
Keep up the great work Ory, victory is within reach
March 6th, 2013 @ 8:46 am
Three weeks after the Supreme Court took under Conference review, case 12A606, no Order has been issued by the SCOTUS on this case, and still pends like a Damocles sword over the head of Barack Hussein Obama.
February 11th, 2014 @ 9:34 am