Update on Taitz v Colvin, legal challenge against the new acting Commissioner of Social Security filed in MD, waiting for the decision of the judge
Posted on | August 21, 2013 | 10 Comments
U.S. District Court
District of Maryland (Baltimore)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv-01878-ELH
Orly Taitz v. Colvin Assigned to: Judge Ellen L. Hollander Cause: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act |
Date Filed: 06/25/2013 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 895 Freedom of Information Act Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant |
Plaintiff | ||
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation TERMINATED: 07/08/2013 |
represented by | Defend Our Freedoms Foundation 29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, Ste 100 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 PRO SE |
Plaintiff | ||
Orly Taitz | represented by | Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Parkway STE 100 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 949-683-5411 PRO SE |
V. | ||
Defendant | ||
Carolyn Colvin Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
represented by | Andrew George Norman Office of the United States Attorney 36 S Charles St Fourth Fl Baltimore, MD 21201 14102094800 Fax: 14109620716 Email: andrew.norman@usdoj.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED |
V. | ||
Interested Party | ||
SSA Notify | ||
Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
---|---|---|
06/25/2013 | 1 | COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 14637067860.), filed by Defend Our Freedoms Foundation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(apls, Deputy Clerk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/28/2013: # 4 Summons) (apls, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 06/28/2013) |
07/02/2013 | 2 | ORDER directing Ms.Taitz to advise court within 14 days of intent re admission to the Courts bar or whether counsel will be entering their appearance; directing clerk to without issuance of summons pending further order of the court. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 7/2/2013. (c/m 7/3/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/03/2013) |
07/08/2013 | 3 | AMENDED COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin, filed by Orly Taitz.(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/08/2013) |
07/09/2013 | 4 | ORDER substituting Orly Taitz as plaintiff in lieu of Defend Our Freedoms Foundation; directing clerk to prepare and issue summons. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 7/9/2013. (c/m 7/9/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/09/2013) |
07/09/2013 | 5 | Summons Issued 60 days as to Carolyn Colvin, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons)(c/m 7/9/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/09/2013) |
07/16/2013 | 6 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orly Taitz. Carolyn Colvin served on 7/10/2013, answer due 9/9/2013. (aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/16/2013) |
08/15/2013 | 8 | Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Orly Taitz. (c/m 8/15/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/15/2013) |
08/21/2013 | 9 | RESPONSE in Opposition re 7 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exibit 1)(aos, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 8/21/2013 (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/21/2013: # 2 Tracking receipt) (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 08/21/2013) |
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
10 Responses to “Update on Taitz v Colvin, legal challenge against the new acting Commissioner of Social Security filed in MD, waiting for the decision of the judge”
Leave a Reply
August 21st, 2013 @ 5:04 pm
Item 7 seems to be missing from the docket.
August 21st, 2013 @ 8:04 pm
What could possibly be a legitimate reason for the delay? Any idea that I am not coming up with? This is a deal that could have been decided on 1 minute after reviewing the matter. Literally!!
August 21st, 2013 @ 8:41 pm
What was item #7?
August 21st, 2013 @ 8:41 pm
What was item #7?
August 21st, 2013 @ 10:00 pm
Dr. Taitz,
This is a brilliant authored complaint….
no wiggle room….at all…
August 22nd, 2013 @ 6:28 am
I have been a life long democrat and still remain proud to have a progressive ideology. At one time, and not too long ago, I thought Ms Taitz agenda insane. I have come to a belief she might have had it right, although I doubt the real power, which would have backed either candidate, will allow the legal issues to be truly investigated. I am leaving the party and will register an Independent soon. In fact I think we should all stop associating with either of these parties. No one, who is President of the United States, wields power as we might think they would. There are powers, the people who have the real money, who make the decisions and quite possibly this man Obama was bought and sold prior to the day he walked into the West Wing. It is obvious by the company he keeps.
August 22nd, 2013 @ 7:15 am
Dr. Taitz
I recently went to a museum and learned about how the State Department prevented the immigration of Jews during the Holocaust just by using stalling tactics. There were quotas for Jews fleeing the Holocaust and the State Dept. managed to meet only 7% of those quotas just by staling. And I think that is what is happening here. The legal system is well aware of the legality of your argument and stalling seems to be one of the methods to avoid being accountable for their actions.
August 22nd, 2013 @ 8:05 am
Can you please post the SSA’s motion that you responded to? Also, doesn’t the SSA get to file a reply to your motion?
August 22nd, 2013 @ 9:56 am
it was not posted on the docket by the court and it is my understanding that SSA does not want it made public, at least this is my understanding from talking to the investigators
August 22nd, 2013 @ 1:46 pm
If he and Holder have nothing to hide then what difference does it make if it’s made public? Remember, we are just all conspiracy kooks anyway so what is it Soebarkah could be scared of? Come on out of hiding you cowardly racist Commie!!