this blogger states the same, as what I had in the breakdown of the votes, Democrats voted for Emken, as she did not queston Obama, and the Dems did not want embarrassment for Obama during the general election
Posted on | June 8, 2012 | 2 Comments
| Joseph 5 approved |
Submitted on 2012/06/08 at 8:49 am
At the risk of repeating my old post: My wife is a Democrat (Yeah, I know, and I still married her). She participated in sending out e-mails (e-mail addresses furnished by Obama2012) to 350,000 Democrats asking them to vote for Emken. My wife said that only a partial list was given because the Democrats did not want to risk that Dianne Feinstein did not get enough votes. It seems that this whole open primary is open to mischief. If a candidate leads in the polls and loses, it should be grounds for a lawsuit on the ground that the law promotes results which are against the will of the people and undermines democracy. Is there any way that you can subpoena the records of Obama2012 or their e-mail list? At the very least, send another letter to the Secretary of State asking how many registered Democrats voted for Emken. I know that individual votes are sacred, but you would only be asking for collective information. Maybe if the Secretary of State does not cooperate, you can send a letter to every Registrar of Voters in every county in California. I am sure that, even if only one responds (there has to be one honest Registrar right?) it will show massive fraud which can then be used to extrapolate statewide fraud. Also, is it illegal to use ballot machines from Venezuela, a country with a leader who is an enemy of the US? Boy, that would make for an interesting legal argument! |
Comments
2 Responses to “this blogger states the same, as what I had in the breakdown of the votes, Democrats voted for Emken, as she did not queston Obama, and the Dems did not want embarrassment for Obama during the general election”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

June 8th, 2012 @ 10:11 am
California voters approved a ballot measure to change the primary process – anyone can vote for any candidate, regardless of party affiliation. It is legal for democrats to vote for a republican, and legal for a political organization to suggest that people vote outside of their party.
June 8th, 2012 @ 12:38 pm
I think that voting outside of your own party is obnoxious. And I think that the (D)’s saw a way for them to make it impossible to anyone to go against Feinstein, not to win, as well.
They saw how tough Orly is…so they came up with this screwed up idea of how to keep the “establishment” in office! This should not have been allowed to help change the course of history! This is another evil….