Supreme Court docketed my Petition for a writ of Certiorari. response from the Dep of Justice, Obama and Pentagon is due November 24. (Thomas MacDonald is the commander in Fort Benning).
Posted on | October 25, 2010 | 9 Comments
No. 10-541
Title:
Orly Taitz, Petitioner
v.
Thomas D. MacDonald, et al.
Docketed:
October 25, 2010
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Nos.:
(09-15418)
Decision Date: March 15, 2010
Rehearing
Denied:
May 14, 2010
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Aug 12 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 24,
2010)
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy
(949) 683-
5411
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Orly Taitz
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
9 Responses to “Supreme Court docketed my Petition for a writ of Certiorari. response from the Dep of Justice, Obama and Pentagon is due November 24. (Thomas MacDonald is the commander in Fort Benning).”
Leave a Reply
October 26th, 2010 @ 10:32 am
Dr. Taitz,
SOCTUS has been waiting for America to reject Obama.
They want the people behind them when they disqualify Obama.
When Republicians take the House and Senate
next tuesday, SCOTUS will not have to worry about being Impeached.
Let us all Pray to Jehova that you will prevail.
God bless you and give you strength.
Love Tony
October 26th, 2010 @ 10:32 am
Dr. Taitz,
SOCTUS has been waiting for America to reject Obama.
They want the people behind them when they disqualify Obama.
When Republicians take the House and Senate
next tuesday, SCOTUS will not have to worry about being Impeached.
Let us all Pray to Jehova that you will prevail.
God bless you and give you strength.
Love Tony
October 26th, 2010 @ 3:15 pm
You are right Tony. There is one thing I would like to add. Lets get information out there to the voters, about which judges we should be voting for that are not controled by the PTB. There is practically nothing on the web sites about this.
October 26th, 2010 @ 6:04 pm
Would love for Orley to win her case, expose obama , and become the Joan of Arc, American style.
But politicians are politicians, and they will not bring this up for debate.
There are too many other things to consider, they will say.
Don’t have too much faith in these new Tea partiers.
they did not make too much noise about obama and his eligibility during their summer rallies.
That should have been the keynote of their bus trips.
Col Larkin was hardly ever mentioned..
What a shame.
Taitz is the only one with enough Hutspa to carry this torch by herself.
Looking to support her with some cash as soon as I can get a job; others should do the same.
October 27th, 2010 @ 3:10 am
This case is not cert-worthy. The appellees will waive response, this will go to conference around January 9 and thereafter be denied. Count on it.
October 27th, 2010 @ 6:41 am
Politijabber,
I am very impressed with your professionalism that you must have first learned in law school. Whoa, “cert-worthy!” Obviously, you have great legal expertise, to sling around such legalese. Okay, I will cut the sarcasm. I am realy, seriously, confused. Do you not realize the difference between rule of law and rule of man? There are thousands of years of precident. Rule by republican constitution (of which ours happens to be the greatest ever devised) guarantees justice and equality for all, guarantees minority rights, and is the basis for liberty. I am not saying it is or has been perfect, but as long as those who swear an oath to the constitution follow through, it is a self-correcting process. Seriously, do you not understand what is at stake here? Once the Constitution is set aside, which everybody who is the least bit informed knows is the case with eligibility, then it is a slippery slope into the hell of tyranny. Do you not understand this??? Did you learn legalese and how to perpetuate deceit, but at the same time are completely devoid of the bedrock of constitutional law? This entire issue should have gone to discovery before the (supposed) inaugeration, well over two years ago. I think you cannot see the forest for the trees. You are brainwashed in law school into thinking that the law is rule of the most cunning, clever liar. It is not, it is rule of the Constitution, there lies the significance of this case. Sincerely, think about what you, your family, your fiends, your country are losing if we allow the Constitution to be set aside because we may find some technicality that makes the TRUTH not “cert-worthy.”
October 28th, 2010 @ 10:05 pm
Retired Navy Lt. Cmdr. Walter Fitzpatrick, who charged Obama with treason, is beaten and tasered by Monroe County Tenn. thugs masquerading as deputies.
Williams claimed Fitzpatrick has never been formally charged with a crime. “No complaint has ever been filed. He’s asked at every hearing to know his accuser, and several different judges have told him it’s none of his business,” said Williams.
“Circuit Court Clerk Marty Cook said Fitzpatrick was sent notice that he was supposed to be in court Friday,” Oct. 22, according to The Advocate & Democrat newspaper. Not so, says Williams. “They never notified Fitzpatrick” about the hearing, Williams asserted. “He found out he was wanted from newspaper reports on Monday.”
“There’s been one death in all of this,” Williams told WND. Newly appointed GOP election commissioner Jim Miller was murdered in July, and “only” Monroe County deputies are suspects”, said Williams.
-Monroe County, Tenn. sounds like Chicago south. Gee, I could only guess who his accuser is…sounds a lot to me like the old Soviet Union. It will be interesting to hear this full story once it gets out and Walt Fitzpatrick tells his side of it…if he doesn’t meet the same fate as Jim Miller, that is.
https://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=221133
October 29th, 2010 @ 5:44 am
Dear Dr. Orly-I don’t know if you saw this, it was posted on Citizen Wells last night-you may recognize some of the names of these journolists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTI_sKK5mfg&feature=player_embedded
JOURNOLIST CONSPIRACY – the “Birther Movement”
October 29th, 2010 @ 7:22 pm
Ooooooh, Alec, I soooo impressed by your legal analysis. Too bad you don’t have a grasp of legal terminology or American law. Cert worthiness has nothing to do with “technicalities” (as your layman’s inept analysis concludes) and everything to do with whether there is lacking any unsettled area of law or conflict between the appellate circuits that requires SCOTUS to decide. Since the law concerning Rule 11 is welly settled and noncontroversial, this petition will be DENIED. You can take that to bank, Alec.