Press release: Judge Hollander issues an opinion on only a part of the FOIA request, which necessitates more FOIA filings
Posted on | May 15, 2014 | 14 Comments
Press release
Attorney Orly Taitz received a response from Judge Hollander in MD. It is limited to only a FOIA request of April 26, 2013, but not to the FOIA request of August 8, 2013, which Judge Hollander did not consider at all.
First, she denied a motion to dismiss by the Department of Justice, stating that there is indeed a controversy, which goes beyond a motion to dismiss
She granted however a motion for a Summary judgment in relation to a FOIA request from April 26, 2013
She did not address a FOIA request from August 8, 2013 and I will need to resubmit it, as it was something similar to cross in the mail, as she was reviewing April 26 FOIA request.
I will attach her 30 page order. There are a number of important issues. I am not sure yet how will these issues be resolved, it might need Congress and Inspector General.
In summary, what is at issue here.
1. Obama posted his tax returns, didn’t “flatten” the PDF file and it showed that he is using a CT SSN 042-68-4425, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, it showed that Obama is using a SSN, which was not assigned to him
2. Investigators Sankey and Daniels found that this number in a number of national databases was assigned to someone born in 1890
3. Investigator Hendershot found that both Obama and Harry Bounel are listed in a database at the same address in Chicago, using the same SSN 042-68-4425. There are only 2 people in this country , who used this SSN: Obama and Bounel
4.Foia request was sent to SSA demanding a application for SSN for Bounel. They responded that they will not release the docs due to privacy reasons See response here; FOIA Bounel
5. Recently US census released its’ 1940 census, which showed that Bounel resided in 1940 in Bronx, NY, which is next to CT and he was born in 1890.
6. In 2011 SSA revealed its’ new rule, which stated that SSA has to provide the SS-5, Social Security applications of individuals born 120 years ago or earlier as these individuals are presumed to be deceased.
7. Taitz requested Bounel’s application to the social Security number 042-68-4425, which Obama fraudulently assumed in and around 1980. In order to facilitate release of records Taitz provided SSA with additional info on Bounel, such as the fact that he was born in Russia in 1890, that he immigrated to the US in 1912, that he lived in Bronx in 1940.
8. SSA did not respond and Taitz filed a law suit. After the lawsuit was filed, SSA responded
9. SSA FOIA officer Dawn Wiggins responded that there are no records for Bounel in SSA databases
10. Taitz responded to Judge Hollander advising her that Wiggins is defrauded the court and in 2012 the same Wiggins found the records for Bounel, but refused to release them due to privacy. Taitz advised the court that originally SSA tried to obfuscate the records claiming privacy. When they realized that Taitz found our about the new 2012 rule and they cannot longer claim exemption of privacy, they made up a new excuse, claiming that the records do not exist.
11. SSA claimed that they made a new assertion that based on the new information they claim that the records do not exist.
12. Taitz responded to the judge explaining that they are using some minor discrepancy for this assertion.for example, if in their database there is a discrepancy, say in their database it says that Bounel came from Moldova, which at a time was a part of the Russian empire and not from Russia, it would mean a discrepancy. If there is a discrepancy in age or year of immigration, they can use this discrepancy to deny records.
13.. the judge responded by telling the SSa to show her that they did proper search and that they did not use a minor discrepancy to deny records.
14. Taitz submitted yet another request to the SSa asking to provide information just on Bounel, without any other parameters, no date of birth, no date of immigration from Russia and so on.
15. The same officer Wiggins responded to the judge that she search and could not find records.
16. So the judge denied the motion to dismiss, but granted motion for summary judgment on the original FOIA request only, which asked for the records with all the parameters. The judge stated that since the new request was submitted while the court case was going on and was fashioned as an appeal, it was superseded by the court case.
17. Judge Hollander also misrepresented a request to submit the matter for criminal investigation to the Federal Grand Jury, as Taitz requested it not as an individual, but sought to do it as ex-relator, stepping in the shoes of the prosecutor. The judge states that there are plenty of able prosecutors around the country. She does not take into consideration the fact that these prosecutors are Obama appointees and after Eric Holder Obama is their ultimate superior, which creates a conflict of interest.
At this junction Taitz is undertaking several actions:
1. filing a motion for reconsideration and a motion for hearing and/or trial
2. will provide additional argument of best evidence rule
3. will provide additional argument on all the evidence of fraud in Obama’s IDs presented to the judge and omitted by the judge from her argument,, when she claimed that SSA acted in good faith
4. Taitz will submit a new FOIA request for info to the SSA seeking SS-5 for Harry (Harrison) Bounel without any other info
5. Will submit a request to US Attorney for Md, Mr. Rosenstein, seeking to forward all the evidence to the Grand Jury and will report to the judge on his willingness or unwillingness to do so, as well as a request or an ex-relator status, if he shows unwillingness to forward evidence to the Grand Jury
6. Taitz is asking the public to provide her with the FOA responses that they ever got from the SSA after they asked for SS-5s based on name and Social Security number of the deceased.
7. Taitz needs original requests for the SS-5 of Lucille Ballantyne, mother of of the SSa actuary Harry Ballantyne, as evidence exists of Obama using her SSN as well and there is a suspicion that Harry Ballantyne was the one who changed the records in the database.
8. Taitz had evidence that several relatives of Harry Ballantyne had SSNs immediately after or somewhere around the number used by Obama which is suspicious.
9. Taitz needs any and all articles on SSA fraud and rampant use of stolen Social Security numbers to show the judge that examination of the original (wet ink) paper records is needed, that numident, computer record , is not enough.
10 any and all articles and cases showing SSa employees falsifying SSA records and being prosecuted. I’ve seen a number of such articles and cases. Please, do it quickly before the regime scrubs those.
see the decision here decision by judge Hollander 2(sorry for posting the decision with markings, I am in a hurry to meet one of my son at the airport and later meet with the voters.. I will download a better copy without markings later)
Taitz v Colvin docket 04.11.2014 Taitz v Colvin Order by Judge Hollander 03.13.2014 Taitz v Colvin filed Reply to opposition to MSJ Taitz v Colvin reply in support of MSJ for plaintiff Taitz v Colvin MSJ 02.19.2014 Taitz v Colvin Motion for Summary Judgment by defense Taitz v Colvin letter from Taitz Taitz v Colvin Letter from US Attorney re extension of time Taitz v Colvin Motion for extension by the defense Taitz v Colvin replacement of US Attorney Taitz v Colvin filed second amended complaint Taitz v Colvin memorandum with order to file an amended complaint Taitz v Colvin Motion for Vaughn index Taitz v Colvin filed opposition and exhibits71pp Taitz v Colvin reply to opposition 09.22.2013 Response to MSJ by Colvin Taitz v Colvin complaint filed, summons, pr of service Taitz v Colvin MSJ by Taitz
Comments
14 Responses to “Press release: Judge Hollander issues an opinion on only a part of the FOIA request, which necessitates more FOIA filings”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
May 15th, 2014 @ 12:55 pm
Dr. Orly, you need to get a couple of legal aides to help with your work load!
May 15th, 2014 @ 4:08 pm
Very convenient for her to ignore the FOIA of August 8. Just don’t know how these people sleep at night. Thank you, Orly, for your persistence & and may you & your family be continuously protected. “Let us not grow weary of doing good; if we do not relax our efforts, in due time we shall reap our harvest.” ~Galatians 6:9
Need everyone’s prayers for Operation American Spring, Col. Riley and all the patriots headed to the District of Corruption.
May 15th, 2014 @ 4:53 pm
Hollander was appointed by Obama? If he is ever declared INELIGIBLE and an interloper, would she lose this position? Would the two Supremes nominated by Obama have to step down? There will be great changes in the judiciary when Obama is exposed it seems.
May 15th, 2014 @ 5:26 pm
Hi Orly,
Posting going to the airport is not to wise, be careful of posting direct locations.
May 15th, 2014 @ 6:13 pm
Judge Hollander is either being threatened or blackmailed probably both. You can bet she has been offered bribes. The evidence is clear and there is no reason for any delays. This gives Obama/Holder more time to destroy records and have Obamas social security number changed on the books and they will just lie and deny and get away with it like they have been doing. We do know that the IRS are Obama supporters. They have been bribed, a few months ago there was a news story about $36 million dollars missing from the IRS account and nobody is going to investigate it. Recently they were also exposed for having scofflaws receiving bonuses. It is clear to see what is going on.People should be occupying George Soros’s house also and demand that he be deported. This is a man that declared that “he believes he is like God”. He is banned from England and a few countries in Europe and living here like a king. He is a major player in all the lawlessness that is going on in our country. Let’s pray that this mission Operation American Spring is successful, in Jesus name Amen…
May 15th, 2014 @ 6:25 pm
Judge Hollander is either being threatened or blackmailed probably both. You can bet she has been offered bribes. The evidence is clear and there is no reason for any delays. This gives Obama/Holder more time to destroy records and have Obamas social security number changed on the books and they will just lie and deny and get away with it like they have been doing. We do know that the IRS are Obama supporters. They have been bribed, a few months ago there was a news story about $36 million dollars missing from the IRS account and nobody is going to investigate it. Recently they were also exposed for having scofflaws receiving bonuses. It is clear to see what is going on.People should be occupying George Soros’s house also and demand that he be deported. This is a man that declared that “he believes he is like God”. He is banned from England and a few countries in Europe and living here like a king. He is a major player in all the lawlessness that is going on in our country. Let’s pray that this mission Operation American Spring is successful, in Jesus name we pray, Amen…
May 15th, 2014 @ 6:38 pm
From the Hollander decision –
Wiggins’s statements, which are “entitled to a
presumption of good faith,”Carney, supra, 19 F.3dat 812, clearly satisfy SSA’s burden to show
that the automated search was reasonable.
So then, can we conclude that the eVerify and Social Security Number Verification System automated searches are also reasonable when they show that Obama does not legally possess the SSN that he is using?
May 15th, 2014 @ 6:57 pm
what does this mean in English?
May 15th, 2014 @ 8:10 pm
I cannot afford them
May 16th, 2014 @ 6:32 am
Spot on Birdy!!! Just throw that back in their faces.
May 16th, 2014 @ 12:47 pm
Dr. Taitz
Can a judge only answer a few of your points on a case? If the judge’s interpretation misrepresents the claim, what actions can you take? Can you ask for a retrial based on technical error?
May 16th, 2014 @ 12:50 pm
I am filing a motion for reconsideration and refiling another FOIA request
May 17th, 2014 @ 12:25 am
Saturday 17 May 2014
Something tells me the continuous ‘ Stall Delay ‘ tactics employed here is not only purposeful but tactics against ORLY TAITZ we should have easily been able to file CRIMINAL charges against OBAMA then pursue prison terms any ordinary citizens using the same technique will be charged with FRAUD and much more.
It is a FELONY to fraudulently use someone else social security number, furthermore, anyone with brain power would obviously observe OBAMA clearly stated he was in United States to study, OBAMA received FULL scholarships on the basis of FRAUD claiming he had been born in KENYA AFRICA not United States the scholarships were approved on the basis of his poverty background and statements he made to that effect and on file.
Obama selective service social security number is yet another issue regarding several of many social security numbers he has used, not to mention his sudden ‘ NEW ‘ social security number just recently issued by SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION only AFTER his use of several other social security numbers are now being investigated and well covered up the only question remains why isn’t he being charged with a FELONY otherwise all of us can start using his social security numbers on our applications for employment and retirement benefits and get away with it without being charged FELONY
May 26th, 2014 @ 2:01 am
[…] Here is the status of the case as of May 15, 2014. Originally Posted by Atty. Orly Taitz Judge Hollander issued opinion on only part of my FOIA request, requiring more filings Posted on | May 15, 2014 Press release Attorney Orly Taitz received a response from Judge […]