• Initial Handling: The application is directed to the Circuit Justice for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which is Chief Justice John Roberts. He has the authority to act alone in the first instance by granting, denying, or issuing a temporary administrative stay to allow time for full consideration. This is routine for emergency applications, as it enables quick action without immediately convening the full Court.
• Full Court Involvement: If Roberts does not resolve it unilaterally (e.g., via a simple endorsement or in-chambers opinion), he typically refers it to the full Supreme Court (all nine Justices) for a vote. A stay requires at least five votes to grant. Given the high-profile nature of this case—involving presidential removal power, Federal Reserve independence, and potential market disruption—Roberts is likely to refer it to the full Court rather than deciding alone, as he has done in similar recent Trump-related emergency applications (e.g., those involving FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter).
• Precedent and Practice: In politically sensitive or precedent-setting stay requests, the full Court often decides after briefings from both sides, as seen here (Cook’s opposition was filed on September 25, 2025). Justices rarely explain their votes in stay orders, but dissents may be noted.

When Will It Be Decided?

• Timeline: No fixed date is set, as the Court handles these on an expedited but flexible schedule. However:
  • The next scheduled Justices’ Conferences are Wednesday, October 1, 2025 (afternoon) and Friday, October 3, 2025 (afternoon), where the full Court could consider it if referred.
  • An order could issue as early as October 1 (post-conference), potentially the same day if urgency is emphasized. In fast-moving cases, the Court has acted within days of full briefings (e.g., Cook’s response was filed September 25).
  • If an administrative stay is needed immediately, Roberts could issue one unilaterally before the conference, but none has been reported as of September 30, 2025.

US Taxpayer Costs in the Kilmar Abrego Garcia Deportation CaseKilmar Abrego Garcia (often spelled with variations like “Kilmarr” in queries) is a Salvadoran national whose case has drawn national attention due to his wrongful deportation to El Salvador in March 2025, in violation of a 2019 court order granting him withholding of removal (protection from deportation there due to gang persecution fears). The Trump administration admitted this was an “administrative error” but alleged MS-13 gang ties (which Garcia denies and has never been convicted on). He was held in El Salvador’s CECOT mega-prison, returned to the US in June 2025 amid court orders (including a unanimous Supreme Court ruling), faced federal human smuggling charges in Tennessee (pleaded not guilty), and as of September 2025, remains in ICE custody facing potential deportation to a third country like Uganda or Eswatini, blocked temporarily by federal judges.While no public sources disclose an exact dollar figure for costs specific to Garcia’s deportation procedures (e.g., ICE detention, flights, legal battles, or repatriation), available reporting highlights taxpayer-funded elements. These stem from DHS/ICE operations under a US-El Salvador agreement where the US pays to incarcerate deportees in CECOT. Below, I break down known and estimated costs based on court documents, government statements, and expert analyses. All are borne by US taxpayers via DHS/ICE budgets (FY2025 ICE enforcement budget: ~$8.5 billion).Key Cost Components

1. Initial Deportation to El Salvador (March 2025):
   • Garcia was deported on a chartered ICE flight with ~260 alleged gang members under the US-El Salvador deal.
   • Flight Costs: ICE deportation flights average $10,000–$20,000 per person for standard removals, but group charters to Central America cost ~$2,000–$5,000 per deportee (per DHS estimates). For Garcia’s flight: ~$500,000–$1.3 million total, or ~$1,900–$5,000 attributable to him.
   • Incarceration in CECOT: US pays El Salvador ~$20,000 per deportee annually ($6 million/year for 300 people, per Salvadoran VP Félix Ulloa’s April 2025 statement). Garcia was held ~3 months (March–June 2025): ~$5,000.
   • Pre-Deportation Detention: ~1 week in Texas ICE facility: Daily cost ~$150–$250/person (DHS data), totaling ~$1,050–$1,750.
2. Repatriation/Return to the US (June 2025):
   • Facilitated by DHS/State Department diplomacy and a private/government flight to Nashville (amid Supreme Court order).
   • Estimated Cost: $10,000–$50,000 (expert Jacqueline Stevens, Northwestern Univ., cited similar third-country returns using private jets + military legs; NPR, Aug. 2025). Includes diplomatic negotiations and logistics.
3. Post-Return Proceedings (June–September 2025):
   • Criminal Case in Tennessee: Federal prosecution (DOJ) for human smuggling. Pretrial detention ~2 months in Putnam County Jail: ~$100–$150/day, totaling ~$6,000–$9,000. Ongoing trial prep adds DOJ/ICE staff time (unquantified, but federal cases average $10,000–$50,000 in direct costs).
   • Immigration Detention & Check-Ins: Released Aug. 22, re-detained Aug. 25 in Virginia ICE facility. Daily ICE cost ~$200/person: ~$1,200 so far (as of Sept. 25).
   • Legal Battles: Multiple lawsuits (e.g., Abrego Garcia v. Noem, Supreme Court No. 24A949). Filing fees alone: $405 (district) + $100 (pro hac vice). Broader costs (court time, DOJ/DHS attorneys): Likely $100,000+ total, per similar high-profile cases.
4. Potential Future Deportation (e.g., to Uganda):
   • Third-country removals are “costly and complex” (NPR, Aug. 2025): $50,000–$100,000+ per person, involving private jets (e.g., to Djibouti) + military transport. ICE avoids solo flights due to expense (Boeing 737 charters: $100,000+/flight).

Estimated Total Taxpayer Cost to Date