Clear example of polls being bogus. Cook report and Uni of VA Center for politics (Larry Sabato) saw Garcia/ Smith match up as a tossup. Garcia won with a huge 12% margin
Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments
Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments
Andrew Cuomo has better ways to get federal aid than issuing threats
Goldman Sachs says a second wave of coronavirus could make the Fed rethink negative interest rates
Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments
Restaurants in some California counties to reopen under restrictions
Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments
Restaurants in some California counties to reopen under restrictions
Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments
Coronavirus live updates: Court strikes down Wisconsin stay-at-home order, Matt Damon’s daughter had virus ‘early on’ and recovered
Based on the Fokker precedent, Judge Sullivan has no legal right to refuse to dismiss the case when the prosecution wants to dismiss the case
Posted on | May 14, 2020 | 2 Comments
Under the Fokker Case that just came out 2 years ago, the DC Circuit which governs Judge Sullivan made it very clear if the government wants to dismiss a case you cannot, the District Court cannot refuse to do so because he doesn’t like the government’s theory. Because he thinks the government should continue the case. And it doesn’t matter if the defendant has pled or not.
DC Circuit’s prior decision on Fokker case PROHIBITS Judge Sullivan to refuse to dismiss the case after prosecution stated that they want to dismiss.
I believe there will be a writ of mandate to the DC circuit. It is absolutely shocking, the level of bias against Flynn in unprecedented. Judge Sullivan read an article about Flynn’s case by Gleason. Gleason is clearly biased against Flynn. Gleason has zero standing to be in the case at all, to argue anything at all, and Sullivan bringing him in the case shows an unprecedented level of bias against the defendant by a judge. This is the same judge who previously baselessly accused Flyn of treason, but later retracted his statement after an outcry.
Since the Arthur Andersen prosecution in which thousands of innocent workers lost their jobs, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has increasingly turned to deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) to avoid the collateral consequences of a corporate criminal conviction.1.SeeBrandon L. Garrett, Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations 41, 44, 55 (2014). In a DPA, the government agrees to dismiss filed charges if a corporation complies with negotiated conditions that are aimed at punishing the misconduct and allowing the corporation to demonstrate rehabilitation. Traditionally, judicial scrutiny over the DPA’s terms has been “essentially nonexistent.”2. Mike Koehler, Measuring the Impact of Non-Prosecution and Deferred Prosecution Agreements on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement, 49 UC Davis L. Rev. 497, 505 (2015) (citing U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, GAO-10-110, Corporate Crime 8, 25 (2009)); see also U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, supra, at 25 (reporting, based on a survey of twelve U.S. district and magistrate judges who handled cases involving a DPA, that judges “were generally not involved in the DPA process”). However, three recent district court decisions have attempted to assert a more substantive role for the court — declaring that an Article III judge is not a “potted plant”3. United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., No. 12-CR-763, 2013 WL 3306161, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. July 1, 2013); see also United States v. Saena Tech Corp., 140 F. Supp. 3d 11, 33 (D.D.C. 2015) (quoting HSBC Bank, 2013 WL 3306161, at *5). or “rubber stamp”4. United States v. Fokker Servs. B.V., 79 F. Supp. 3d 160, 164 (D.D.C. 2015). when reviewing DPAs. The D.C. Circuit subsequently curtailed these efforts in United States v. Fokker Services B.V.,5. 818 F.3d 733 (D.C. Cir. 2016). in which it held that to preserve “the Executive’s long-settled primacy over charging,”6.Id. at 743. a court is not authorized to reject a DPA based on a finding that the “charging decisions” and “conditions agreed to in the DPA” are inadequate.7.Id. at 747. By ostensibly precluding judicial review of a DPA’s negotiated terms, the D.C. Circuit overcorrected and reinforced the executive branch’s unchecked discretion over DPAs by reassuring prosecutors that future courts will rubber stamp such agreements.
The Harvard article continues noting the Judge in the Fokker case stated that:
…as a matter of established law, the judiciary is not to second-guess the Executive’s decisions of “whether to initiate charges, whom to prosecute, which charges to bring, and whether to dismiss charges.”
Sol Weisenberg discussed this matter on Laura Ingraham show. Weisenberg is the former Whitewater prosecutor.
Based on the Fokker precedent Judge Sullivan has no legal right to refuse to dismiss the case when the prosecution wants to dismiss the case
Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments
Under the Fokker Case that just came out 2 years ago, the DC Circuit which governs Judge Sullivan made it very clear if the government wants to dismiss a case you cannot, the District Court cannot refuse to do so because he doesn’t like the government’s theory. Because he thinks the government should continue the case. And it doesn’t matter if the defendant has pled or not.
DC Circuit’s prior decision on Fokker case PROHIBITS Judge Sullivan to refuse to dismiss the case after prosecution stated that they want to dismiss.
I believe there will be a writ of mandate to the DC circuit. It is absolutely shocking, the level of bias against Flynn in unprecedented. Judge Sullivan read an article about Flynn’s case by Gleason. Gleason is clearly biased against Flynn. Gleason has zero standing to be in the case at all, to argue anything at all, and Sullivan bringing him in the case shows an unprecedented level of bias against the defendant by a judge. This is the same judge who previously baselessly accused Flyn of treason, but later retracted his statement after an outcry.
FOX leads among cable news networks, however combined numbers of the networks on the left are pretty much the same as FOX on the right. The nation seems to be evenly divided
Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments
CABLE NEWS RACE
TUES. MAY 12 2020
FOXNEWS HANNITY 4,481,000
FOXNEWS TUCKER 4,368,000
FOXNEWS FIVE 4,017,000
FOXNEWS LAURA 3,718,000
MSNBC MADDOW 3,466,000
FOXNEWS BAIER 3,240,000
MSNBC O’DONNELL 2,526,000
MSNBC HAYES 2,027,000
CNN CUOMO 1,832,000
CNN TAPPER 1,577,000
CNN COOPER 1,510,000
AZ’s Mark Kelly Silent on Firm’s Windfall From Chinese Tech Giant
Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments
AZ’s Mark Kelly Silent on Firm’s Windfall From Chinese Tech Giant
Breaking! SEN. RON JOHNSON TO REQUEST BIDEN, OTHER OBAMA-ERA OFFICIALS TESTIFY ON ‘UNMASKING’
Posted on | May 13, 2020 | No Comments
SEN. RON JOHNSON TO REQUEST BIDEN, OTHER OBAMA-ERA OFFICIALS TESTIFY ON ‘UNMASKING’
“It Is Absolutely Foreign for any Judge to Consider Bringing in another Judge to Co-Pilot a Case!” – Judge Jeanine GOES OFF after Judge Sullivan Goes Rogue with US Law (VIDEO)
Posted on | May 13, 2020 | No Comments
“It Is Absolutely Foreign for any Judge to Consider Bringing in another Judge to Co-Pilot a Case!” – Judge Jeanine GOES OFF after Judge Sullivan Goes Rogue with US Law (VIDEO)
Judge Sullivan Appoints Anti-Trump Judge John Gleeson to Decide Flynn Case After He Pens Anti-Flynn WaPo OpEd — 2 Days Ago!
Posted on | May 13, 2020 | 1 Comment
UPDATE: Judge Sullivan Appoints Anti-Trump Judge John Gleeson to Decide Flynn Case After He Pens Anti-Flynn WaPo OpEd — 2 Days Ago!
Democrat Law Professor Turley Speaks Out Against Judge Sullivan’s Decision to Bring in Retired Judge, Float Perjury Charge Against Flynn
Posted on | May 13, 2020 | No Comments
Democrat Law Professor Turley Speaks Out Against Judge Sullivan’s Decision to Bring in Retired Judge, Float Perjury Charge Against Flynn
Posted on | May 13, 2020 | 1 Comment
MIKE BRAUN: ESTABLISHMENT INFATUATION WITH FAUCI ‘SHOWS WHAT’S WRONG’ WITH D.C…
…’SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVES ROLLING OVER’
The retired federal judge who was appointed Wednesday to argue that Michael Flynn should be held in criminal contempt of court for changing his guilty plea published an op-ed in the Washington Post Monday criticizing the Trump administration. This will go to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court will find that Judge Sullivan abused his discretion. Flynn will file a civil case for abuse of his constitutional rights under the power of authority
Posted on | May 13, 2020 | No Comments
Retired Judge Who Will Argue Against Michael Flynn Said Case ‘Reeks of Improper Political Influence’
The retired federal judge who was appointed Wednesday to argue that Michael Flynn should be held in criminal contempt of court for changing his guilty plea published an op-ed in the Washington Post Monday criticizing the Trump administration.
















29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 
