original miscellaneous case in HI was converted to civil case. New civil case will be under a new number 11-00519. Old number was 11-158. MC case is being terminated and a new civil case will be available shortly
Posted on | August 24, 2011 | 20 Comments
U.S. District Court
District of Hawaii (Hawaii)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11-mc-00158-SOM -RLP
|
Taitz v. Astrue Assigned to: JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY Referred to: JUDGE RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
Date Filed: 08/08/2011 Date Terminated: 08/24/2011 |
| Plaintiff | ||
| Dr. Orly Taitz | represented by | Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100 Santa Margarita, CA 92688 (949) 683-5411 Fax: (949) 766-7603 PRO SE |
| V. | ||
| Defendant | ||
| Michael J. Astrue Commissoner of the Social Security Administration |
represented by | Jill T. Nagamine Office of the Attorney General-State of Hawaii Kekuanao’a Building 465 S King St Rm 200 Honolulu, HI 96813 587-3050 Email: Jill.T.Nagamine@hawaii.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED |
| Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2011 | 1 | (Proposed) Order on Ex Parte Emergency MOTION for Emergency Order to Show Cause and to Compel Attendance for Production of Documents and for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs – by Plaintiff Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Emergency Order to Show Cause and to Compel Attendance for Production of Documents and for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(emt, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/8/2011: # 5 Exhibit D) (emt, ). (Entered: 08/08/2011) |
| 08/08/2011 | 2 | Filing fee: $ 39, receipt number HI000664 re 1 Ex Parte Emergency MOTION. (emt, ) (Entered: 08/08/2011) |
| 08/08/2011 | 3 | NOTICE of Hearing on 1 MOTION to Compel is set for 9/14/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 before JUDGE RICHARD L. PUGLISI. Plaintiff to provide notice of the hearing to Loretta Fuddy, Health Department, State of Hawaii. (agh)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. (Entered: 08/08/2011) |
| 08/08/2011 | 4 | EO: The 1 MOTION to Compel will be heard in the normal course. Plaintiff to provide notice of the hearing to be set to all interested parties. (JUDGE RICHARD L. PUGLISI) (agh)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 08/08/2011) |
| 08/22/2011 | 5 | REQUEST for ECF Number – by Orly Taitz. (emt, ) Modified on 8/24/2011 ~ event type modified from “request” to “motion” (emt, ). (Entered: 08/23/2011) |
| 08/23/2011 | 6 | PROOF OF SERVICE – by Orly Taitz. (emt, ) (Entered: 08/23/2011) |
| 08/23/2011 | 7 | PROOF OF SERVICE – by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Mailing Documentation)(emt, ) (Entered: 08/24/2011) |
| 08/24/2011 | 8 | NOTICE of Hearing 5 REQUEST for ECF Number :. Motion Hearing set for 8/30/2011 09:00 AM before JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY. Parties notified.(tbf, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. (Entered: 08/24/2011) |
| 08/24/2011 | NOTICE TO PARTIES. Please be advised that miscellaneous case MC 11-00158 SOM-RLP has been converted to a civil case. Please reflect the new case number CV 11-00519 SOM-RLP on all further filings. (emt, ) (Entered: 08/24/2011) | |
| 08/24/2011 | COURT’S CERTIFICATE of Service – a copy of NOTICE TO PARTIES Re: Case Number shall be served by First Class Mail to Orly Taitz at the address of record on August 25, 2011. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (emt, ) (Entered: 08/24/2011) |
Comments
20 Responses to “original miscellaneous case in HI was converted to civil case. New civil case will be under a new number 11-00519. Old number was 11-158. MC case is being terminated and a new civil case will be available shortly”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

August 25th, 2011 @ 8:21 am
Why would they cancel the original case and set up a new civil case? It seems to me that this should be a criminal case. Is this another effort to make the case look insignficant or to stretch out any court decision?
August 25th, 2011 @ 10:02 am
I see that they posted a hearing for Tuesday. Is it a routine matter, or do you want your supporters to come and provide support?
August 25th, 2011 @ 2:55 pm
Will this have any legal ramifications on the case? Is this a good thing, a bad thing, or inconsequential? I’m not a lawyer, so I’m just curious what this means for you and the case going forward.
August 25th, 2011 @ 4:09 pm
Orly, this is so exciting. Another civil case and now you have standing.
Good luck and God bless.
August 25th, 2011 @ 4:55 pm
sounds fishy to me! Then again, I’m not a lawyer!
They’re setting things up for down the road they want a certain action to take place. I don’t trust them….then again, none of us do on here.
That’s why we’re here!
August 25th, 2011 @ 7:44 pm
is the switch from misc to civil a good thing? I am trying to stay informed on whats going on as a concerned citizen
August 25th, 2011 @ 8:09 pm
I assume this is a good thing, going from a misc. to a civil case, Right?
August 26th, 2011 @ 10:44 am
Shouldn’t you be in NC today? I hear that there are some nice vacation spots right on the beach. Check it out.
August 26th, 2011 @ 3:34 pm
Dr Taitz,
I just saw on the internet that there is a Motion Hearing set for 8/30/2011 09:00 AM before JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY in Hawaii.
Please check it out because they may be preparing to dismiss your case there because there was no one there to represent you. Can you have someone appear on you behalf and request more time to appear because this seems to be an awful short notice.
August 26th, 2011 @ 3:41 pm
Please pardon my previous post, I see that you are already aware of the hearing because it is listed as item #8, I just hope that they are not trying to pull a fast one on you.
Good Luck and Best Wishes
August 26th, 2011 @ 7:10 pm
Just saw today that the HI DOH is claiming that the subpoena was improperly served so that they don’t have to appear and show anything, that it was ‘mailed’ and not presented, etc.
My ? to anyone with more legal expertise is:
1. Do their arguments carry sufficient weight to belay or kill the case Orly, etc., has brought agains them?
2. What are the chances now, after the HI Atty Gen. has sided with Fuddy, of them EVER have to produce the original b/c, or is this, at least as I see it, a fight to the death for the Obots.
3. What legal options can the HI DOH/Atty Gen pursue to keep this case in abeyance forever and thus, to protect their own ‘*sses’ forever from the truth coming out.
In short, is there anyone who can give a synopsis of the salient aspects of if/when/ever the HI Obots will have to ‘give it up’ or do I die of old age waiting?
August 28th, 2011 @ 12:25 am
August 8 is only a phone hearing, a formality for an out of state attorney to get electronic filing
August 28th, 2011 @ 12:47 am
Oh, good. You have all those ECF classes and certifications in order, I’m sure.
August 28th, 2011 @ 5:42 am
Dr. Taitz, I see the DOH has filed an opposition to the subpoena motion to compel, under the new case number. Whereas the defendants had previously filed no such responce within the alotted time before Aug. 8. Would not this cause the opposition to be,”moot”, or does this now become a faction for the Court to throw the proceedings back to Judge Lamberth or a higher Court?
August 28th, 2011 @ 6:09 am
Does this mean there will not be a hearing, in front of a judge, on September 14th?
August 28th, 2011 @ 12:12 pm
yes, there will be a hearing
August 28th, 2011 @ 4:00 pm
Are you taking your experts with you to the hearing on the 14th? You might get a bench ruling, in which case you could proceed immediately to the DOH.
August 29th, 2011 @ 6:05 am
It is SO obvious with all the stonewalling they are doing that they have something to hide.
August 29th, 2011 @ 7:04 am
Julie,
are you going to pay for them to fly time and again?
August 29th, 2011 @ 7:08 am
Tuesday is a routine matter, phone conference