10 Responses to “November 30, 2011 hearing against Director of Health Fuddy and Registrar Onaka has been docketed”

1. Insight
   October 30th, 2011 @ 8:04 pm

   What’s this hearing for, lady Liberty? Is this where the court will order Fuddy to show you Obama’s records?

2. Insight
   October 31st, 2011 @ 6:58 am

   Orly – Prominent conservative Randall Terry is running against Obama in the New Hampshire primary. He’s one of the candidates listed as having made the ballot in your post. Maybe you could represent him. He’s got standing. He’s a Democrat and he’s running against Obama. And, like you, he’s prominent.

3. William
   October 31st, 2011 @ 7:06 am

   Insight,

   American Citizens could only hope that the Judge would yield such order for verification(s) of authenticity.

   It is not a matter of “If” Obama’s legal qualification records will be exposed, it is only a matter of “When” that happens.

4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   October 31st, 2011 @ 7:47 am

   I need people in the courtroom supporting me, so that “When” comes sooner

5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   October 31st, 2011 @ 7:48 am

   why don’t you contact him and see, if he is interested

6. Insight
   October 31st, 2011 @ 8:26 am

   I am not prominent and would not get the time of day with him.

   He’s a Democrat candidate with standing. Why don’t you contact him? He is, exactly what you have been looking for for 3 years. And with the recent dicta, from the 9th Circuit that this is the kind of candidate who, could have standing I don’t understand why you are not proceeding.

7. john
   October 31st, 2011 @ 12:25 pm

   William, “courageousness” is not a word. You mean “courage”. Where did you learn English, anyway?
   Orly, this hearing isn’t really “against” anybody but you. You’ll be asked why your emergency motion should be granted, you’ll explain, your explanation will be found wanting, and your motion will be denied.

8. margie
   October 31st, 2011 @ 3:47 pm

   john –
   Would you please stop fussing about HOW people express, and try to focus on WHAT they write?
   Especially since you are misguided.
   Courageousness, as William wrote, IS a word: “Noun 1. courageousness – a quality of spirit that enables you to face danger or pain without showing fear”
   So would you please take your seat and focus on what matters rather than boasting with what you think you know. You are wasting space.
   I also appreciate Dr. Taitz’ courageousness.

9. john
   November 1st, 2011 @ 2:43 pm

   Margie – what one wishes to express is often compromised by one’s inability to express it. William’s writing is meaningless. This is mostly due to the fact that he couches his simple-minded ideas in fancy verbiage. Case in point – read the definition that you quoted without citation from the Internet, and then tell me how it differs from the definition of the simple word “courage”.

Leave a Reply