Notice
Posted on | October 5, 2009 | 13 Comments
I just got a phone call from Liza Mundy, Washington Post reporter. She stated that the article was postponed to Tuesday. I guess theya are waiting for judge Carter’s opinion.
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
13 Responses to “Notice”
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE

Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687

--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------

Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------

--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee










October 5th, 2009 @ 7:50 am
Dr. Taitz,
Thank you for your dedication to uncover the truth and protect the Constitution of the United States! You are a great American for this. PLEASE keep us up to date on the court case, there are MANY people behind you.
-aTb
https://blog.politicalgas.org/2009/10/03/first-post–eligibility.aspx
October 5th, 2009 @ 7:51 am
Thank you for your dedication Dr. Taitz! Keep up the fantastic work in finding the truth and protecting the Constitution! You are a great American for this! There are MANY people behind you.
-aTb
https://blog.politicalgas.org/2009/10/03/first-post–eligibility.aspx
October 5th, 2009 @ 7:58 am
please post the outcome here ASAP….
thanks
-aTb
https://blog.politicalgas.org/2009/10/03/first-post–eligibility.aspx
October 5th, 2009 @ 8:54 am
Dr. Orly, Thank you for the unbelivable amount of good you are doing. Your hard work and determination is unsurpassed. I rose early this morning to pray for you, as I am sure many have done. The favor of God is on you and with you. Expect good things. God bless you and your family. Your friend,Carmen
October 5th, 2009 @ 10:26 am
I’ve been following many of these lawsuits. It’ll be interesting to see what Judge Carter does today.
If he does not dismiss the case, will that immediately open discovery? To build a case for January?
October 5th, 2009 @ 12:42 pm
I read a thread yesterday where a sighting of Eric Holder was reported in Georgia before the trial before Judge Land. It would be interesting to know if he made a trip to Santa Ana today.
October 5th, 2009 @ 12:54 pm
Whether Obama is constitutionally “eligible to the office of President”, and thus eligible for “the carrying out of [the] constitutional… duties of the President”, depends upon whether Obama is a “natural born Citizen” of the United States.
Whether Obama is a “natural born Citizen” of the United States depends upon the information contained within his original long form birth certificate.
Thus, Obama’s original long form birth certificate unequivocally relates to and has an effect upon whether or not he is eligible for “the carrying out of [the] constitutional… duties of the President”.
Thus, Obama’s original long form birth certificate is not a “personal record” according to the US CODE regarding “Presidential records”. Please see US CODE, Title 44, Chapter 22, § 2201 (3), which is copied below.
Hence, pursuant to US CODE, Title 44, Chapter 22, § 2205 (2)(A), Obama’s original long form birth certificate “shall be made available pursuant to subpoena or other judicial process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction for the purposes of any civil …investigation or proceeding [including but not limited to a UIPA §92F-15 Judicial Enforcement Proceeding].
Please note that US CODE Sections 2201 and 2205 are Article IV “general laws” enacted by the Congress which “prescribe the manner in which such… [public Presidential] records …shall be proved…”
Thus, perhaps Article IV, the US CODE, and a UIPA §92F-15 Judicial Enforcement Proceeding, will result in what no Senators or Representatives have been willing to do, which is to support and defend Article II of the Constitution of the United States.
Article IV Section 1
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleiv.html#section1
Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public …records …of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such… records …shall be proved, and the effect thereof.
US CODE – TITLE 44 – CHAPTER 22 – PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sup_01_44_10_22.html
§ 2201. Definitions
As used in this chapter—
(1) The term “documentary material” means all …documents…
(2) The term “Presidential records” means documentary materials …which relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional …duties of the President.
Such term [“Presidential records”]—
(A) includes any documentary materials relating to the political activities of the President or members of his staff, but only if such activities relate to or have a direct effect upon the carrying out of constitutional… duties of the President; but
(B)[The term [“Presidential records”] does not include any documentary materials that are…
(ii) personal records;
(3) The term “personal records” means all documentary materials …which do not relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional …duties of the President.
Such term [“personal records”] includes—
(C) materials relating exclusively to the President’s own election to the office of the Presidency…
Please note, Obama’s original long form birth certificate relates to the very heart of whether or not Obama is eligible to carry out the ever present “consitutional …duties of the President”. The “carrying out of [the] constitutional… duties of the President” is thus an ongoing requirement of the President. Thus, Obama’s original long form birth certificate does not exclusively relate to Obama’s “election to the office of the Presidency”. Hence, § 2201 (2) (C), above, does not apply to Obama’s original long form birth certificate
§ 2205. Exceptions to restricted access
Notwithstanding any restrictions on access imposed pursuant to section 2204—
(2) subject to any rights, defenses, or privileges which the United States or any agency or person may invoke, Presidential records shall be made available—
(A) pursuant to subpoena or other judicial process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction for the purposes of any civil …investigation or proceeding;[including but not limited to a UIPA §92F-15 Judicial Enforcement Proceeding].
§92F-15 Judicial Enforcement.
(a) A person aggrieved by a denial of access to a government record may bring an action against the agency at any time within two years after the agency denial to compel disclosure.
(b) In an action to compel disclosure the circuit court shall hear the matter de novo. Opinions and rulings of the office of information practices shall be admissible. The circuit court may examine the government record at issue, in camera, to assist in determining whether it, or any part of it, may be withheld.
(c) The agency has the burden of proof to establish justification for nondisclosure.
October 5th, 2009 @ 2:51 pm
When will we hear about the results of the the court case today? I hope the judge lets this case proceed. The evidence is there to proceed.
October 5th, 2009 @ 3:21 pm
Any info on this, yet?
October 5th, 2009 @ 5:49 pm
Dear Orly:…Hi. It’s Phil Again. It appears that the people at the local library have put some kind of [google page before your site]!!! So that I couldn’t write any type of message here, in case this actually works? But was able to send you an email from there!
Also, On that page from Google, it says something about someone complaining about your site! Now…that has to be someone who came into the library to do this…! Cause I’m on a regular comp here at a print shop! And didn’t have any trouble with accessing your site and writing this message! There was [NO!] Google page before I found your site from this print shop!! That means that some establishment type from my end made a complaint about your site! But I will discuss this with them on Tuesday, since I’m gone from the library now. My time was up!
I think it’s been done (?)…if I didn’t know any better, than to stop ME from being able to make contact with you! You see, they are trying to stop you and me and anyone else who is pushing them too far!! So hey, Orly, push them clear off the freakin’ cliff, huh? LOL!
And I think that only one of my 3 emails got through to you? And would like to know what is your fax number? I have seen two differnt numbers lately! And didn’t know if you had changed that or not? Here’s a site for a type of stun baton that I have…which you might be able to carry with you for protection? ! I think this is the correct url. Will check that later…since I’m on a pay comp right now.
Also:…here’s another url for you to check on a couple of security items:…
! It has a lot of stupid, funny things in it, but on page 22-23 of the latest catalog that I receive, you will find a couple of great items which might be of interest to you? And their phone number is: (800-843-0762). Toll-free!
On the stun gun…I have 2 models: 1-300,000 volts stunning capacity and 1-500,000 volts. The smaller one you might be able to carry in your bag?
On pages: 22…(item number: LS-84281 at the upper left corner; And the page 23…(item number:LS-85108 (Bug Detector)…and (LS-85090) on upper right side, a DVR Pen w/sound. Read the write up on all 3 items. I may be getting the top one in the near future!
Take care and I’ll see if I can get to your page from my webtv at home tonight? Hang Tough!
And…PLEASE…KICK THEIR ASS!!!!!!!
Your loyal friend, Phil Olmstead (Davey Crockett…)
October 5th, 2009 @ 6:19 pm
Will be worth wait-ing for.
Was there, in front row.
October 5th, 2009 @ 6:38 pm
Orly, I am not sure I advised you of this, but the Washington Post admits knowing of the Lt Quarles Harris murder. They told me the exact date that it was published in the Washington Times. The Post did not publish it.
Be careful, Capatain.
October 6th, 2009 @ 12:36 am
Dr. Taitz, I was in court today and heard every word you spoke. I was at the edge of my seat the entire hearing and I just wanted you to know that as a veteran of Judge Carter’s war, if I were the judge of this case, I believe I would rule in your favor. Your final remarks were as passionate and moving as I have ever heard spoken and I’ll bet the judge changed his mind about immediately dismissing the case after hearing them.
I’m afraid, however, that Judge Carter has been offered a nice promotion, after a “prudent” period of time, and this case will be dismissed. If he does rule in your favor, he probably has been told he will never receive a higher judgeship in his lifetime.
You were magnificent today, and I was right by your side during the entire proceeding, as were, I’m sure, 99.9% of the people in attendance. I hope I’m wrong about the about Judge Carter. I hope you win, because you, and we the people, deserve to win this one!
DRB