Posted on | July 24, 2012 | No Comments
| General Docket United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit |
| Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304 |
Docketed: 10/31/2011 Termed: 05/25/2012 |
| Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974 |
| Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue |
| Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Fee Status: Fee Paid |
|
| Case Type Information: |
| 1) Civil US |
| 2) United States |
| 3) |
|
|
| Originating Court Information: |
| District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL |
Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL |
| Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge Date Filed: 02/16/2011 Date Order/Judgment: Date NOA Filed: 08/30/2011 10/25/2011 |
|
| 01/19/2012 |
 |
MOTION filed [1353593] by Michael James Astrue for summary affirmance. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/03/2012) [Service Date: 01/19/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen) |
| 02/13/2012 |
 |
MOTION filed [1358927] by Orly Taitz to permit pro se electronic filing (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/24/2012) [Service Date: 02/11/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 02/13/2012 |
 |
MOTION filed [1358929] by Orly Taitz to extend time to file response to motion for summary affirmance (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/24/2012) [Service Date: 02/11/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 03/01/2012 |
 |
CLERK’S ORDER filed [1361423] denying without prejudice motion to permit pro se electronic filing [1358927-2]; granting motion to extend time [1358929-2]; response to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2] now due on 03/16/2012 [11-5304] |
| 03/16/2012 |
|
INCORRECT DOCKET ENTRY-DISREGARD–RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364401] by Orly Taitz to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2] [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]–[Edited 03/20/2012 by KRM] |
| 03/16/2012 |
 |
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012) combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS “MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT”] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 04/27/2012 |
 |
MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012) [Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 05/25/2012 |
 |
PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304] |
| 06/04/2012 |
 |
PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304] |
| 06/20/2012 |
 |
SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304] |
|
Comments