Letters of outrage sent to CA “Rally for Liberty” secretary in protest of his decision not to let me speak, because they took an official position that usurper with no papers Obama is eligible and they do not allow anyone with opposing view speak
Posted on | February 22, 2012 | 9 Comments
(no subject)
InboxX
Reply |g Bullock gse3000@hotmail.com to secretary, me
show details 2:36 PM (10 minutes ago)
Dear Mr. Bostrum, are you kidding me? Everyone knows that you, I , & them do not agree with all
canidates running for office, be they state or national offices. But,, we, you, me, & them have always
heard all canidates out. This we do in a free society, with freedom of speech. The gall of you and yours
to ask for a canidate to freely speak, and then later take it back, is unheard of and uncalled for & setting a
powerful prececent of prejudice. That’s right. “PREJUDICE”! Whom and how do you presuppose to
know what, Orly Taitz will use as her agenda and or talking points for election to the Senate of the United
States of America, representing California. She has a wide front of many opinions on many issues with
the solution to many. By not letting her express her winning views on many issues, you are making a
large mistake, as thousands, upon thousands and millions want to hear her views, so they, not you,
can make a determination for the best of our American future.
Mr. Bostrum, it is OK to change you mind and say, I have made a mistake, We take it back, our error, we didn’t mean
to alienate this canidate or the “CITIZENS”, of the state of California, or the, “CITIZENS”, of the United States
of America! OOPS!, there you go again taking things out of context!
So guts up, Mr. Bostrum, do you have the fortitude, to be brave & let the lady, a legitimate canidate for the
senate seat of California, speak and have her day in the sunshine of freedom of the great U.S. of A.
Here’s hoping this day finds you and your family well and happy & in God’s grace.
Sincerely, a supporter of freedom and a contributor to your salary, As always, Garth
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
9 Responses to “Letters of outrage sent to CA “Rally for Liberty” secretary in protest of his decision not to let me speak, because they took an official position that usurper with no papers Obama is eligible and they do not allow anyone with opposing view speak”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

February 22nd, 2012 @ 3:00 pm
I sure wish you could hear me, strongly, applauding you, Garth. Even if Mr. Bostrum continues to be a pimple on the ass of progress, you are my hero!
February 22nd, 2012 @ 3:24 pm
BRAVO!
February 22nd, 2012 @ 4:42 pm
What was it that prompted Ms Taitz to question President Obama’s birth information?
February 22nd, 2012 @ 5:13 pm
The smokescreen you and yours have been throwing up since 2008, S. Reynolds. Also, the millions that Soetoro has spent hiding his papers. He’s askeered of something…
February 22nd, 2012 @ 6:06 pm
S Reynolds
Where the hell have you been the past three years.Are you just another of the Obama idiots.
February 22nd, 2012 @ 6:13 pm
S.Reynolds, I believe Hillary Clinton was the first person to raise the question of Obama’s eligibility. That was before the Bilderburgs told her she would play second fiddle.
February 22nd, 2012 @ 6:42 pm
My educated guess, S. Reynolds, is that every document Obama has in his possession, which might be used to prove his citizenship, has been forged. The most recent is the phony birth certificate he presented to a select few last April.
But this President has a little insect with a stinger he locates somewhere in every event involving discussions of his eligibility. Ugh Ugh Ugh.
If this professional liar did in fact have an official American BC in the Hawaiian Health Dept archives, being guarded by even better liars, why was a criminal, in the credit card scam business, directed by the WH to breach hefty Security and steal the passport application data on file for Obama, Hillary and McCain? Well, perhaps when Obama applied for an American passport, he forgot and used the wrong name! Of course Hillary and McCain both had authentic passports, but their names were added apparently to “defocus” the public’s eye on Obama. Who knows?
Further, if Obama had this mysterious BC hidden away under guard, why did he, or his staff, steal the Soc Sec number of another person residing in a State where Obama never resided in his life? Why indeed, because he had no means whatsoever to show citizenship.
Finally, if he did in fact have a BC in the Health Dept archives, Why was Gov Abercrombie, a democrat, unable to find it to “settle this issue once and for all”? Why was Donald Trump with his untold resources, also unable to find this mysterious document?
This arousal from within the party brought forth the need to forge as best the Health Dept staff could, a document that at least resembled a Hawaiian BC. The big mistake by the forgers was to rely on the capability of today’s computer. Tch tch tch. The resulting computerized facsimile could not have been produced in the early 60’a since the appropriate software on an appropriate computer did not exist.
Merciful God! And this man thinks he has the brain to lead this great nation. Mr. George Soros??? You wasted a lot of good money bringing this alien to the democrats. Faithful and loyal men and women of the democratic party, you have been robbed of the Roosevelt, Truman and Kennedy party. Why not kick some ass, and get your party back, so Americans can taste again the joy and fun of the Donkey and the Elephant? Ahhh yes, those were the days!!
February 23rd, 2012 @ 3:54 am
That is the typical Democratic political response in covering up the truth- But they cant keep covering up forever because we will NEVER give up until the TRUTH is revealed to America that Obama is a FRAUD who has deceived America-
February 23rd, 2012 @ 8:18 am
@S Reynolds February 22, 2012 4:42 PM
“What was it that prompted Ms Taitz to question President Obama’s birth information?”
The 2008 Democratic Party of Hawaii’s “Official Certificate Of Nomination” (“OCON”) which, as opposed to its previous OCONs and in direct violation of Hawaii law, did not certify Obama as eligible to serve as President “…under provisions of the United States Constitution.”? Obama’s own party in his alleged birth State intentionally not certify his eligibility should have prompted everyone to question everything regarding his eligibility.