Judd v Obama Exparte Motion to expedite Preliminary injunction
Posted on | September 22, 2012 | 5 Comments
Judd v Obama Exparte Motion to expedite Preliminary injunction
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
5 Responses to “Judd v Obama Exparte Motion to expedite Preliminary injunction”
Leave a Reply
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE

Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687

--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------

Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------

--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee










September 22nd, 2012 @ 3:03 pm
September 22nd, 2012 @ 3:09 pm
This is excellent! It looks like you really have Obummer cornered.
Only one question. Why wasn’t Obummer arrested in Georgia and what was the result of the hearing? Why didn’t Judge Mahili issue a warrant for his arrest? Do you have his opinion? Shouldn’t you include it with what you’re filing with the court? Or will Judge Carter call him to find out what happened so it is just not necessary to add that additional paper work?
September 23rd, 2012 @ 11:36 am
If you are Barack Hussein Obama supporter or NOT, you have to agree that the LIST OF Barack Hussein Obama WRONG DOING is the LONGEST LIST of WRONG DOINGS of any President of the United State’s History.
Just off hand I could list QUIT A FEW CRIMINAL WRONG DOING that it appears Barck Hussein Obama has committed, yet the courts keep looking the other way. By doing that aren’t the Court breaking the law?
September 23rd, 2012 @ 6:53 pm
Here is the latest research. The Hawaii gloom, bride, and birth indexes have been altered. Subjects names are smaller font with different fonts for the same letter. Both Nishimura and Nagamine speak broken English so may be Nazi plants. Sheriff Joe’s investigator confirms the lack of security and easy alteration with the indexes. Also he questioned security of the computer system. This means no marriage certificates or birth certificate tied to the altered index. Nagamine is claiming because Obama’s name is in the index there is a BC in the vault. Also BARRACK is the correct spelling. Cheers
September 24th, 2012 @ 10:52 am
Is it just my imagination, or is “LEGAL HONESTY” becoming a “FLEETING VIRTUE” in our “FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM”?
Has anybody else notice that “LEGAL HONESTY” appears to becoming a “FLEETING VIRTUE” in our “FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM”?
Why is it that most, if not all Americans have “NO STANDING” when it comes to “CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS.
Shouldn’t all American Citizens be on a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD when it comes to CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS.
Didn’t one of our forefathers say something to the effect “JUSTICE FOR ALL”
It certainly appears to me that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. has been “DENIED” a lot of “JUSTICE” in our “FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM”
Why? Did the Doctor do something “WRONG”?