from my suppoter to Justin Elliott “Salon.com”
Posted on | December 5, 2011 | 4 Comments
Salon story- better!
to me
show details 4:55 PM (6 minutes ago)
Dr Taitz-
I don’t know , if my letters to Mr Elliot did any good, but he seems to have written a more even-handed and moderate article than most journalists- I keep posting, posting on blogs and writting to Govt officials- – nobody has ever come back and told me I was crazy for my assertion that the lack of Govt arrests of birthers = proof that birthers have presented factual evidence to court- not lies.
Hawaii has shown itself to be above the laws of mainland America.
Good Luck,
and shalom
Mark Smith
–
Dear Mr Elliot,
Thank you for writing an even handed story today about Orly Taitz’s efforts to remove Obama from the NH primary ballot. If just one state removes Obama, everyone will see that the emperor wears no clothes, when the required evidence is not presented. You printed the Obama Ct SS number ( a rare occurrence for a journalist) and it is easy to verify that Obama couldn’t have legally obtained it- just go to the SS death Index,
https://ssdi.rootsweb.ancestry.com/
and type in the first 5 numbers of the Obama Ct SS number- look at over 400 death notices and you will see that everyone of them was issued in CT.
Sincerely,
Mark Smith
From: redacted
To: jelliott@salon.com
Sent: 11/29/2011 8:04:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
Subj: Birtherism- the majority says it’s wrong
November/29/2011
Dear Mr Elliot,
I don’t have a college degree, but I have had an epiphany or two-
the 2008 online (it just appeared one day) Obama certification of live birth- if you check, you can find google images of short form Certifications and Certificates of live birth- do you know the difference between them? Hawaii has changed procedures ( and informational state web pages) in an effort to obscure why Obama has both a certification and certificate of live birth (2011)- . Anecdotal reports from people who were born outside of a hospital in Hawaii seem to indicate that Hawaii only issued Certificates of Live Birth to people who were born in a Hawaii hospital- The door step babies got a certification of live birth and could not get a long form Certificate of Live birth. Obama has both- which tells me that- one or possibly both of them are fraudulent- but both can’t be real.
Watch the April 27 Obama news conference- notice that Obama says “others” examined his long form BC and said it was real, but also notice that Obama never said it was really his. Look high and low- try and find an Obama 1st person quote, where he swears to the veracity of the online birth documents- I can’t find one. Obama is getting ready to release his Long Form COLB- hooray- he now has the hammer to smash the birthers once and for all, the reporters are on the edge of their seats- questions, questions an more questions– but Obama is going to answer them and destroy those racist birthers- and what does Obama do? why he makes some flippant wisecracks and RUNS away from the news conference! Any police detective knows that a liar will take the first opportunity available to them to dodge answering questions. Lies won’t stand up to a barrage of questions. If Obama won’t publicly swear they are real and his, then why should anyone believe they are? The story is Obama’s lawyers flew to Hawaii and got the birth document- then THEY released it- ( did you see the pictures of the lawyers getting it in Hawaii?- they took an expensive private jet- no siree, no cheap public flight that could be investigated) Obama never touched it- very odd, when a stamp would have mailed it to him and he could have opened the sealed envelope in front of reporters- an unbroken chain of ownership, which would be admissible as evidence in court- the online version we have now is tainted ( no documented unbroken chain of custody) and is not acceptable to the court as evidence.
The clincher for me is:
No birther has ever been charged or arrested for lying to the court about negative Obama documents they have presented, presenting false evidence, libel or slander- if they were arrested, they would then have standing in court to issue an enforceable subpoena to examine the Obama birth documents alleged to be in the Hawaii vaults- of which the microfiche image is the best proof available. They could also force Social Security to release the SS-5 for the Conn. SS number that Obama has been using.
Obama is the punching bag for birthers, simply because he has no viable options to stop their continuous assault for his records- and calling them carnival barkers has not deterred them.
It is possible for only one person to be right-
Do you remember that only one amateur fraud investigator, Harry Markopolos went to the SEC about Bernie Madoff?– 5 times in 7 years he tried to get the SEC to investigate his compelling evidence about Bernie’s fraud- and the proof was as obvious as the egg on the faces of the SEC, when Bernie Madoff confessed to his $65 billion ponzi scheme in 2008- before the SEC had even looked into it. You can’t trust the words of politicians or Hawaii government lackeys- like the, “I didn’t have sex with that woman”, President Clinton.
On July 15, Obama said, “I’ll be 50 in a week”- I believe slipped up and he told the truth- his real birthday is around July 21-23 and his grandmother did the late Hawaii registration for her grandson, who was not born in a Hawaiian hospital.- People just don’t trust their own judgment anymore- well, first you have to abandon cognitive dissonance, when the obvious goes against popular opinion. When I did a google search, it seemed I am the only one who has been saying that lack of government prosecution of birthers by the DOJ = proof that the Obama documents in question have some , shall we say, flaws.
Mark Smith
Comments
4 Responses to “from my suppoter to Justin Elliott “Salon.com””
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

December 5th, 2011 @ 6:19 pm
Why do people obsess about the scanned online image being invalid? Of course the scan, or a picture, or a photocopy of the certified copy is not an official document. The fact that it has been reproduced does not change the certified status of the document itself. As far as the “long form”, it is not certied in the first place, they are not issued as official documents anymore.
December 5th, 2011 @ 6:48 pm
no,obama claims, that it was certified
December 5th, 2011 @ 8:55 pm
I never wish harm on anyone, not even people like Orly Taitz. In fact I hope for the opposite. May whatever mental illness she is suffering from, alleviate itself, so that she’ll snap out of this madness and stop chasing windmills.
December 6th, 2011 @ 2:49 pm
Reply to above obot comment, the facts sure are blowing those windmills, the energy of truth has stamina. The hot air from lies and deceit is vaporous. No ID, no vetting, no proof of any past for barry soetero can you spell FRAUD?