OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

from Chris Strunk

Posted on | June 6, 2012 | 1 Comment

 NEW California runoff system an infringeme​nt of speech and associatio​n
chris@strunk.ws 7:23 AM (11 minutes ago) 

The new top two winner runoff is an infringement of speech and association wherein the incumbent picks her opposition candidate in that the supporters of the incumbent may poach by voting for whomever they wish in the selection below and thereby include targeting support for the GOP Central committee choice to knockoff a real threat.
The various associations are prevented from selecting a candidate without interference from both outside and within the non voters of the party or association to represent them against the incumbent. This is a 14th Amendment issue of serious proportions!!
It is especially bad since what should be a party member primary vote choice ONLY was overshadowed when the GOP central committee decided to endorse EMKEN over and against all other party members who are candidates. By doing so the GOP central committee thereby caused voting panic among its members (as if this were the general election instead of just a party primary) thereby interfering with their own party primary, and in effect interfered in the same way as WiFi did by sending here party members in to vote for the GOP Central committee choice too.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

One Response to “from Chris Strunk”

  1. Heinrich S. Dudekofsky
    June 6th, 2012 @ 10:44 am

    This is not a new system. Jungle primaries have existed in Louisiana for years without issues. It places candidate over party. For example, what if the top two candidates were both Republicans – it gives a chance to all voters regardless of party registration to vote for the best candidate. In a normal system, you are limited to the party. Yes it can be abused, but that is purely speculative.

    Not sure how Strunk gets to an “incumbant gets to pick their challenger.” That makes no sense. First, anyone can switch affiliation and vote for the other party in a regular system. Second, Feinstein obviously had a lot of folks voting for her as she pretty much got as many votes as everyone else combined. Third, does he have proof that Feinstein did the very picking of her challenger? No, he does not.

    Lastly, a jungle primary system takes the control out of the party chiefs as anyone can jump in the primary regardless of what the major parties want.

Leave a Reply