11 Responses to “from a supporter: corruption and treason are reasons for the decision of the IN elections commission”

1. Rod Riddle
   February 25th, 2012 @ 2:24 pm

   Iguess I’m not bright enough to figure it out here so someone plz enlighten me. If the “Burden of Proof” lies with the prospective candidate to provide valid documentation that proves their eligibility to hold office, how was Obama declared “Eligible” when he was out in Aspen, Co. wasting our $$ on yet another lavish excursion???? My 2nd question is why doesn’t he just have his attorney gather up all the documentation in question, take it into one of these “Eligibility Hearings” and prove his challengers wrong and end the matter? I don’t get it here.

2. orly taitz
   February 25th, 2012 @ 2:49 pm

   because no attorney would want to go to prison by submitting Obama’s forgeries

3. Bloodless Coup
   February 25th, 2012 @ 3:26 pm

   I remember I once had an administrative hearing due to a contested unemployment claim. I had quit my job with good cause because I had been promised a promotion several times but was repeatedly pass over for it when the position became available.

   I filed my claim and met with one the adjudicators for the Unemployment Office, he listened to me tell my side of the story and then presumably contacted my former employer to hear theirs.

   A date for a hearing was set. I showed up but my former employer did not show. I was immediately granted a default judgement and was allowed to collect unemployment benefits. This is noramlly how an administrative hearing goes when the defendant fails to appear.

4. orly taitz
   February 25th, 2012 @ 3:40 pm

   yes, it happened with another candidate Patricia Inez Sandovar.
   They put the usurper Obama above the law, I felt like being in Nazi Germany in 1939s

5. Rod Riddle
   February 25th, 2012 @ 5:12 pm

   Here’s an analogy of just how utterly insane the outcome of both the Georgia and Indiana Hearings really are. 2 High School Football Rivals are set to meet up for a game on Fri night. The Home Team is at the Stadium conducting their Pre-Game rituals and are ready at the designated kickoff time. The opposing team never even shows up for the game. A School District Official walks across the field to the Coach who showed up with his Team ready for war. The Official says, ” well I know your not going to be happy to hear this but you lost the game tonight. The other team won!!” WHAT??!!

6. tell
   February 25th, 2012 @ 7:16 pm

   Attorneys are protected from that Orly and you should know better. Attorneys are just representing their clients.

7. RacerJim
   February 26th, 2012 @ 7:37 am

   @Ron Riddle

   “My 2nd question is why doesn’t he just have his attorney gather up all the documentation in question, take it into one of these “Eligibility Hearings” and prove his challengers wrong and end the matter?”

   The best, and most appropriate, answer to your question comes from Obama’s own mouth: “The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.”

   Additionally, Obama’s failure to present evidence at a hearing/trial to disprove his challengers’ allegations is very similar to what 2004 Democratic nominee Senator John F. Kerry did when “Kerry Associates” and other Kerry supporters filed at least three civil libel/slander suits against the “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” (“SBVT”) in that Kerry refused to allow his complete military records to be entered into evidence (to rebut/refute the SBVT’s allegations) during pre-trial evidenciary hearings…cases against the SBVT dimissed.

8. Rod Riddle
   February 26th, 2012 @ 8:41 am

   Hey Mr. Tell, I see you want to try and make an argument as to why Jablonski didn’t just gather up Obamas’ pertinent documents and take em to court fullfilling the burden of proof and thus ending the matter. I’m not an attorney yet common sense tells me doing that is a heck of a lot more ethical than advising a client to be held in contempt of court by not even showing up. So tell us Mr Tell, why didn’t Jablonski do that?

9. LitlBits
   February 28th, 2012 @ 9:40 am

   Chris: You are commenting with a host of incorrect assumptions…if you READ TRUE HISTORY, you will understand that it is the Democrats who have supported enslavement – NOT Republicans! You are drinking too much Kool-Aid and reading too much liberal B.S.!
   And here we have a Democratic “president” who has torn up the Constitution and taken over as a self-appointed king (or worse!) – the problem here is that he has been enabled by too many in Congress and our Courts who have either been duped or bought out! (as in Georgia who suddenly got permits for TWO new nuclear power plants TWO DAYS after dismissing the case against the king!
   (and if all these men and women in Congress are dumb enough to be duped by this usurper, they should be VOTED OUT – AND prosecuted for aiding and abetting the biggest case of TREASON in this nation’s history!

10. Anonymous
    May 4th, 2012 @ 3:39 pm

    Wow… Lilbit ur a Genius on how things really work.
    Fox News is the best. Gee Wiz. Maybe someday I can think
    Like you.

    Thanks for your intelligent input

Leave a Reply