OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Draft of Opposition to Motion to Strike

Posted on | May 18, 2012 | 5 Comments

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ.

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, Ste. 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA  92688

Ph 949-683-5411 F949-766-7603

Orly.Taitz@gmail.com

CA Bar License 223433

In propria Persona in MS

US DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ                                )

BRIAN FEDORKA                                        )

LAURIE ROTH                                              )

LEAH LAX                                                     )

TOM MacLERAN                                         )

)

V                                                                     )

DEMOCRAT PARTY OF MISSISSIPPI,       )

SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI )

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA                       ) CASE# 3:12-cv-280

OBAMA FOR AMERICA                               )

NANCI PELOSI                                               )

DR. ALVIN ONAKA                                       )

LORETTA FUDDY                                          )

MICHAEL ASTRUE                                        )

JANE DOES, JOHN DOES 1-100                   )

 

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST ATTORNEYS FOR THE DEFENDANT  DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF MISSISSIPPI

 

Comes now Plaintiff  Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ and opposes Motion to Strike filed by the defendants on May 16, 2012.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

  1. Motion for sanctions against the defendants and their attorneys Samuel Begley (Hereinafter “Begley”) and Scott J. Tepper (Hereinafter “TEPPER”) was filed due to the fact that  Begley and Tepper submitted to this court with their Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings an alleged true and correct copy of the original long form birth certificate for Barack Obama and were seeking a judicial notice of this court of the aforementioned birth certificate, even though Begley and Tepper had in their position sworn affidavits of multiple experts, including a senior deportation officer with 30 years of experience John Sampson, and others, as well as transcript and DVD or the press conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, all of whom attested to the fact that the ALLEGED COPY OF AFOREMENTIONED  BIRTH CERTIFICATE REPRESENTS A COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY.   Tepper and Begley were seeking to defraud this Honorable court and the public at large by slipping this document among 200 or so pages and having Honorable Judge Wingate and Magistrate Anderson sanitize and legitimatize this flagrant forgery through a judicial notice. These actions represent moral turpitude, particularly knowing that this is a case of national importance. This matter became even more acute recently as the biography of Mr. Obama, prepared by his literary agent in 1991 resurfaced and it showed Mr. Obama being born in Kenya. This biography was available from 1991-2007, until Mr. Obama decided to run for the US Presidency and forged documents were prepared. (Exhibit1 Biography by Mr. Obama’s literary agent). Pursuant to recent findings of forgery in Obama’s identification papers by Sheriff  Joe Arpaio of Arizona, Secretary of State of Arizona demanded verification of the birth certificate of Mr. Obama and the issue of eligibility moved to the front burner issue for the whole nation.
  2. Mr. Tepper and Mr. Begley filed a Motion to Strike the whole Motion for Sanctions, claiming that Mr. Obama’s Social Security number is in it. Begley and Tepper did not oppose motion for Sanctions on the merits.
  3. The motion itself does not contain any Social Security numbers.
  4. One of the exhibits contains a Social Security number, which can be redacted. There is no justification to strike the whole motion for sanctions.
  5.  On and around April 15, 2010 Mr. Obama personally posted his full unredacted Social  Security number on line on the Internet, on WhiteHouse.gov by posting his tax returns and not “flattening “ the PDF file, (Exhibit 2) so thousands or millions of people got the number that he is using. This number was entered in E-verify (Exhibit 3) and SSNVS Social Security Number Verifications Systems (Exhibit 4)  and got a response that the number that Mr. Obama is using in his tax returns and his Selective Service certificate was never assigned to him. Taitz and thousands of other citizens filed complaints with the Attorney General of the US, Commissioner of Social Security, IRS, yet nothing was done yet. At any rate Mr. Obama personally made the number used by him available to the whole nation.
  6. On January 26, 2012 Taitz conducted examination of seven witnesses in eligibility trial of Mr. Obama in Georgia. All of the major networks (CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS) were present and videotaped and transmitted the proceedings. Millions of viewers in the US and around the World watched the proceedings. Presiding judge, Michael Malihi, allowed all the witnesses to testify in regards to the full unredacted Social Security numbers and  Social Security fraud committed by Mr. Obama according to witnesses,  and Obama’s  use of a Connecticut Social Security number, which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify. By now Mr. Obama’s Social Security number became a matter of common knowledge. By now most of the nation knows the Social Security in question and wonders, whether there will be an end to the unprecedented corruption in the US judiciary, as the Social Security Fraud, elections fraud, forgery and uttering of forged documents are flagrantly committed in the highest office of the land and a number of governmental officials, attorneys and some judges are being complicit.

CONCLUSION

Due to the fact that there is no Social Security number even mentioned in the motion for sanctions and all of the exhibits aside from exhibit 4, the motion and all of the exhibits aside from exhibit 4 should not be stricken and there is no justification to strike them.

Exhibit 4, Affidavit of Senior Deportation Officer John Sampson should not be stricken as the Social Security number in question is a matter of common knowledge, as posted on line by Mr. Obama himself and allowed to be presented at trial by Judge Malihi in the Administrative Court of the state of GA.   Alternatively a Social Security number in one exhibit can be redacted and neither the motion nor the exhibits should be stricken. Motion to Strike filed by the defendants should be denied. Motion for sanctions against the attorneys Begley and Tepper   should be granted as unopposed. Defendant Democratic party and attorney Begley and Tepper did not oppose the motion for sanctions on the merits and therefore motion for sanctions should be granted.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

5 Responses to “Draft of Opposition to Motion to Strike”

  1. Ed O.
    May 18th, 2012 @ 5:41 pm

    Orly,
    I have a print out where Obama’s own atty. Alexandra M. Hill admitted the long-form birth certificate is a forgery (The NJ Mario Apuzzo’s case)

  2. Paul Jackson
    May 19th, 2012 @ 3:09 am

    Ed… unless you just made it up, no, you don’t.

  3. Smiley Pete
    May 19th, 2012 @ 5:08 am

    and you have reading comprehension. The opposing council submitted copies of the COLB and LFBC because the ones you had submitted were illegible. They did not submit them claiming they to be true and correct copies. So, you are really working on getting yourself in deeper trouble than you already are in.

  4. orly taitz
    May 19th, 2012 @ 6:29 am

    no, they submitted them for the purpose of authentication

  5. Nick
    August 26th, 2012 @ 1:56 pm

    I struggle to maintain a relationship with my son because his mom and her lawyer lie in court and I dont have the wherwithall to do something about it. My son is being exploited by his mom with the help of the taxpayers. I’m a veteran and now see that my time would have better spent learning the law instead of fighting for this country.

Leave a Reply