Department of Justice made an appearance in Taitz v Sebelius in TX
Posted on | September 10, 2012 | 4 Comments
Activity in Case 3:12-cv-03251-P Taitz v. Sebelius et al Notice of Attorney Appearance
Inbox
x
9:23 AM (3 minutes ago)
to Courtmail
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. If you need to know whether you must send the presiding judge a paper copy of a document that you have docketed in this case, click here: Judges’ Copy Requirements. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov.
U.S. District Court
Northern District of Texas Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered by Hasday-DOJ, Lisa on 9/10/2012 at 11:23 AM CDT and filed on 9/10/2012
Case Name:
Taitz v. Sebelius et al
Case Number:
3:12-cv-03251-P
Filer:
Michael Astrue
William A Chatfield
Eric Holder
Barrack Hussein Obama
Nancy Pelosi
Kathleen Sebelius
Document Number:
12
Docket Text: NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Lisa Robin Hasday-DOJ on behalf of Michael Astrue, William A Chatfield, Eric Holder, Barrack Hussein Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Kathleen Sebelius. (Hasday-DOJ, Lisa)
3:12-cv-03251-P Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Lisa Robin Hasday-DOJ     lisa.hasday@usdoj.gov, heather.deramus@usdoj.gov, tami.parker@usdoj.gov, usatxn.ecfcivil@usdoj.gov
Orly Taitz     orly.taitz@gmail.com
3:12-cv-03251-P Notice required by federal rule will be delivered by other means (as detailed in the Clerk’s records for orders/judgments) to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1004035775 [Date=9/10/2012] [FileNumber=6460969-0 ] [ae754d4f6c5d714f451e78a3c1218de5875ca80e578c95dfce3f82673c5aaa6cbb8 d198bea27b2ceac3ef2b490460e0dec511aa976ea198e82fc38b742440a20]]
Comments
4 Responses to “Department of Justice made an appearance in Taitz v Sebelius in TX”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

September 10th, 2012 @ 9:45 am
Talk of Cancelling Debates?:
————–
Cancel the Presidential Debates: We Have Unvetted Candidates
Article II Super PAC @ Washington Times
On August 30, 2012, Article II Super PAC sent letters to all appointed Members of the Commission on Presidential Debates reminding them of their organization’s mission and responsibility to the people of the United States. That is, no presidential candidate can take part in the upcoming debates without authenticating their Article II qualifications.
We know there is no state or federal agency responsible for vetting presidential/vice presidential candidates, but rather this extremely serious national security responsibility rests solely within the purview of the national political parties.
Therefore, Article II Super PAC along with countless of other citizens have requested from the Commission on Presidential Debates to “clarify its official position on this national security issue and explain how the CPD qualifies Presidential candidates’ constitutional eligibility as natural born Citizens of the United States.”
We will immediately post the CPD’s response if and when we receive it.
To read the letter click – https://www.art2superpac.com/presdebates.html
September 10th, 2012 @ 3:10 pm
i wonder if it brought the judge bribery money or threats? isnt it sad to have to feel this way??
will
September 10th, 2012 @ 5:17 pm
I would take it as intimidation..,we know how they operate..
Also I was just reading this:
https://www.dickmorris.com/obama-thugs-rough-up-gallup-for-polls-they-dont-like/
September 10th, 2012 @ 8:13 pm
Very interesting! And…I heard about the Gallup Poll attack. They should file something to have the people, responsible for this, arrested! I hope Gallup won’t let this stop them with posting honest numbers!
This also says: that Gallup is right in the figures they post!