Department of Justice has filed an opposition to transfer Barnett et al v Obama to DC
Posted on | January 6, 2010 | 9 Comments
Activity in Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Captain Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al Objection/Opposition (Motion related)
Tuesday, January 5, 2010 3:49 PM
From:
“cacd_ecfmail@cacd.uscourts.gov”
Add sender to Contacts
To:
ecfnef@cacd.uscourts.gov
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered by DeJute, David on 1/5/2010 at 3:49 PM PST and filed on 1/5/2010
Case Name:
Captain Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al
Case Number:
8:09-cv-82
Filer:
Joseph R Biden
Robert M Gates
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Michelle LR Obama
Barack Hussein Obama
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 10/29/2009
Document Number:
106
Docket Text:
OPPOSITION Opposition re: First MOTION to Transfer Case to District of Columbia[105] filed by Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama. (DeJute, David)
Comments
9 Responses to “Department of Justice has filed an opposition to transfer Barnett et al v Obama to DC”












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

January 6th, 2010 @ 6:48 am
Orly– I firmly believe that somewhere at sometime you have to bring forth that BHO has by his own published words nullified his eligibility for POTUSA by stating his father was a Kenyan who was subject to British rule. The fact must be given that our Constitution in Article I Section 8 provision 9 definitely, without equivacation imbeds The Law of Nations into our Constitution and by this act specifies that a natural born citizen is one born in acountry of parentS who are it’s citizenS. Emphasize the plural.
I believe that the Founding Fathers, who wrote such a wonderful and concise document, forwent a need for defining ‘natural born citizen’ because they knew it was covered by making The Law of Nations in it’s entirety a part of the Law of Our Land.
These were wise men who realized what wrongs might be done and they wanted these wrongs punished as fraud and usurption.
January 6th, 2010 @ 10:09 am
Just exhaust the legal options Orly and make it known that there is no longer a judicial check on what the government has done. The good people of this land are waiting patiently to bring to bear the next course legitimized by exhausting the remedies the constitution avails we the people against an illegal government act. I say patient only because the will to take a much more dangerous course is tempered with the belief that the law remains supreme until all methods which are prudent have been exhausted. Let us hope the tyrants are brought down by fair ballot.
January 6th, 2010 @ 10:35 am
I agree with James. The fact that by
Barry’s(Barack)own published words stating his father was a Kenyan, nullified his eligibility for POTUS. This fact probably needs to be emphasized more strongly going forward.
January 6th, 2010 @ 10:41 am
By the way, is it not a conflict of interest for the DOJ to be working on the behalf of Barry (Barack)? How could they possibly be unbiased about this case? That’s akin to me asking my boss to prove that he is eligible to be my boss. I would probably be fired immediately.
January 6th, 2010 @ 11:01 am
Dr Orly Taitz , I agree with Mr Koslow , the
Obama scandal must be recognized as complete
( ie ) with intent Fraud , Obama knew ( Knows ) that what he has done is against the U.S. Constitution and must be dealt with as Treason against the United States of America !!!
January 6th, 2010 @ 1:01 pm
Orly, what did the DOJ write in their Opposition? Please post it so we can all read it. Thanks.
January 6th, 2010 @ 1:18 pm
Can you publish the contents of the objection filed so we can see the grounds on which the DOJ is objecting? I don’t see a way to access that information on the web posting.
January 6th, 2010 @ 3:10 pm
ihv>>> i thought that the DOJ was supposed to be there to protect the people of this country, so what the h&^l are they doing protecting these bunch of crooks.. someone needs to set this record straight….
maybe someone could file charges of treason against them? because that is exactly what they are doing by protecting this bum
will
January 6th, 2010 @ 10:12 pm
I thoroughly agree with Mr Koslow. “Natural Born” has always been in American Constitutional understanding “land and parentage.” Hence, McCain was scrutinized for “land” because both parents were American. Obama is being scrutinized for “land” and parentage, and has disqualified himself by his own admission. Of course, that Nancy and Harry et al, cared not for “minor” Constitutional requirements which would “rain on their parade”, is hardly surprising….in their pedantry they assumed most of America was ignorant and could get away with it. Watch their surprise when the Constitution rises nobly in full authority, and a President Pro Tempore soon replaces a President De Facto. BTW, Glenn Beck’s dismissal of “birther” arguments should NOT be taken too seriously…it was a marvelous rhetorical device to introduce a subject by taking a stance diametrically opposed to what one would expect. It is brilliant, as are you. G-d bless, Dr Orly.