9 Responses to “As I feared, Judge Carter did not reconsider his prior ruling and I am proceeding with 5 other cases”

1. The Phoenix
   September 4th, 2012 @ 3:20 pm

   Hard to believe! With all the evidence you presented to Carter and then, Arpaio’s further evidence, he has the nerve to do this again!

2. Mark
   September 4th, 2012 @ 4:57 pm

   The US government in all parts has basically told “We The People” you will not be a free nation anymore and your way of living will be radically changed and tightly controlled to be under one ruler either by consent or by conquest.

3. winnybar
   September 4th, 2012 @ 5:21 pm

   Carter, Alaxrod, Hallerstein, Lamberth, Obama, Bauer, the Clintons all speak broken English and as American Universities don’t teach that but perfect English you have to believe they are from another country. Google GulfBPAtomicBombExpose for the full story.

   Portions of the Lucas hearing are below. Carter’s English definitely not polished!

   David F. LaRocque says, I met Lucas Smith at the September 8, 2009 hearing in the case Barnett et al v. Obama. I found Lucas Smith to be a serious and credible individual, as did others who met him at the hearing (the second of three hearings in the Barnett case prior to its dismissal by Judge David O. Carter despite prior assurances by the judge that the case would be heard on its merits.)

   Lucas Smith was prepared to testify at the Sept 8 hearing. When Obama’s Justice Department attorneys objected strongly to any testimony from Mr. Smith, Attorney Taitz suggested that he be given an opportunity to provide a deposition concerning the Kenyan birth certificate. Judge Carter indicated strong interest in this alternative, stating:

   …why cannot that deposition (of Lucas Smith) take place while this witness is here? In other words, this witness is present. That deposition could take place. It’s not interfering with the jurisdictional issues that you have because it’s not ‘discovery’ that she is seeking from you. It’s some witness that she has that she believes she can’t get back in a timely fashion.

   Hold on. I know you’re opposed to it. I can read your mind.

   My question is, why not? First of all, it gives the government a wonderful glimpse of what is forthcoming. It lets you prepare.

   Number two, it allows you to put on this witness who’s come all the way from Kenya, whether they’re in danger or not.

   Number three, if people need to get this particular witness back, as you claim, that he or she is essential to your claim, then the government can bring them back.

   So from the government’s perspective, what are you doing this week? Where are you from?

   …Now the problem is, though, if this witness is languishing out in the hallway, and you believe that the witness is critical, that person has to continue to languish.

   …And my initial question was, to the government, what harm? In other words, they (the defendants) actually got a glimpse of what your claim is…so why wouldn’t we take this witness with the admonition that this witness would have to be called back.

   In other words, I’m really concerned about people testifying who are available…

   And the response from Obama’s attorneys: “…I think it is an unwise move at this point in time to order this witness be deposed.”

   In other words, we (Obama and his attorneys) do not want to hear what Lucas Smith has to say, either in live testimony or in a written deposition, and we certainly do not want the purported Kenyan birth certificate to be made a matter of record and to be subjected to professional analysis by the court.

   Judger Carter responded: “I’m just a little perplexed why that wouldn’t be to your benefit, because in case your motion (to dismiss) fails, you know exactly what is coming and you have a chance to either prove it or disprove it, but I leave that to your wisdom.”

4. JAK
   September 4th, 2012 @ 7:35 pm

   Orly I hope you are keeping a list of government officials especially judges who have thwarted the rights of citizens to get the truth. Someday there will be Pearl Harbor sequel to be known as ‘the Years of Infamy’.

5. shadotrak
   September 4th, 2012 @ 9:25 pm

   Judge carter is not a true judge he is an OBAMA
   puppet just like all of the other ones who will not consider “A PERPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE”

   They are all looking for favors and a foot up the ladder to a higher position.

6. jobethian
   September 5th, 2012 @ 7:04 am

   Unbelievable. Judge Carter – who got to you? And How?
   The same thing is apparently happening in Ohio on Susan Daniels’ case. The Judge in Ohio looks like he will dismiss the case about Obama’s CT SSN.
   What is going on in America? How can this be happening here?
   The GOP and the Courts are adding and abetting a criminal usurper. They know that our elections are rigged. Why won’t they do anything to stop all this from happening?

7. shadotrak
   September 5th, 2012 @ 8:47 am

   Of course not with an OBAMA hit man standing over hhis shoulder he was in a “DO OR DIE” situation.

8. shadotrak
   September 5th, 2012 @ 8:48 am

   Of course not with an OBAMA hit man standing over hhis shoulder he was in a “DO OR DIE” situation.

9. Karl
   September 5th, 2012 @ 5:39 pm

   How do we know that it was judge Carter and not one of his clerks who made the decision unbeknownst to him?

Leave a Reply