After half a year and filing a law suit I received a FOIA response from the SSA, which was supposed to be provided within 20 days. Still most important info is missing and I am proceeding with legal action
Posted on | March 24, 2011 | 8 Comments
President
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
10.03.10
Ms Dawn Wiggins
Social Security Administration
OEO FOIA Workgroup
300 N. Green Street
P.O. Box 33022
Baltimore, MD 21290-3022
Dear Ms. Higgins,
I am requesting US Code 5 §552 FOIA disclosure of the following information in regards to a number of matters where the disclosure of information under US code 5 §552 FOIA is essential in the interest of US National Security and preservation of the 14 th amendment Equal Protections rights of the U.S. Citizens. A copy of this letter is being forwarded to the 36,000 outlets of U.S. and International media, Inspector General of the Department of Justice and Public Integrity Unit,
Requested information is as follows:
1. Official SS- 5 Social security application for Stanley Ann Dunham, mother of Barack Obama,(Exhibit 1) show it to be filled out in 1959, however on the bottom of the card, the revision 7/65. What does 7/65 mean? Does it mean Revision date 7/1965?
2. What are the dates for the social security form SS-5 revisions?
3. Previously I requested release of Social Security number application 042-68-4425, issued in the state of CT in and around 1977 to an elderly individual born in 1890 and later assumed by Barack Obama. SSA refused to provide the application. Due to the fact that the full application was denied, I am requesting only partial information:
a. zip code to which the original card was mailed
b. gender of the applicant
c. date of the application
Please, see attached a sworn affidavit from a recently retired senior deportation officer of the department of Homeland Security John Sampson, attesting to the fact that it is a common practice to release partial SS-5 application. (Exhibit 2)
4. Research of the National databases shows that there were several individuals born between 1890-1896, who obtained Social security cards shortly before passing away, possibly for the purpose of receipt of the Medicare benefits. I am requesting a certified photocopy of the original applications for ss-5 for these individuals, as they are deceased and privacy concerns would not apply in regards to deceased individuals. Please see an enclosed check for the $27 fee per copy, made payable to the Social Security Administration, attached to the request
Bossing Margaret
042-68-4437
Birth 07 January, 1896
Death November 1982
SS card issued around 1977
DEMO, ANTOINETTE
Born 30 May 1890
Died Apr 1979 8806810 (Danbury, Fairfield, CT)(none specified)
Connecticut 042-68-9248
Social security card issued between 1977-1979
5. If another individual assisted those elderly in filling out such SS application, I am requesting information on the name of the individual, who assisted the applicants as well as the official, who processed them.
6. Please, see attached sworn affidavit of a licensed investigator, certified by the department of the Homeland Security, Susan Daniels. It states the in the national databases name Barack Obama is linked to other social security numbers, among them 485-40-5154
This number was actually assigned to Lucille T Ballantyne
born 12.22.1912
died 09.13.98
The son of Ms. Ballantyne, Harry C. Ballantyne was the Actuary of the Social security administration with an access to all social security records and death indexes. As any change in the social security records is supposed to leave a paper trail and electronic trail, showing the access code of the employee, who effectuated the change, please advice, if the paper trail and/or electronic trail of such records shows Mr. Harry C. Ballantyne, Actuary of the Social Security Administration, making any changes or alterations and/or additions to Social Security records 485-40-5154 and/or 042-68-4425, 042-68-4426, and/or 042-68-4427 or any other records, contained in the Affidavits of the investigators Sankey(Exhibit 4), Daniels(exhibit 3) and Sampson (Exhibit 1).
As breach of the integrity of the Social Security administration represents the matter of National security and the time is of the essence, I request a response to this request within 20 days,
Sincerely,
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ.- President of
Defend our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688
Public Integrity Section
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington DC 20530-0001
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders
The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya
Palais des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
International Criminal bar Hague
United Nations Commission for
Civil Rights Defenders
Orsolya Toth (Ms)
Human Rights Officer
Civil and Political Rights Section
Special Procedures Division
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
tel: + 41 22 917 91 51
email: ototh@ohchr.org
Comments
8 Responses to “After half a year and filing a law suit I received a FOIA response from the SSA, which was supposed to be provided within 20 days. Still most important info is missing and I am proceeding with legal action”
Leave a Reply



















29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

March 24th, 2011 @ 7:52 am
LOL !!!! How can they say with a straight face that with knowing only the SS number, the gender, the zip code, and the date of application “you can use the requested information to identify the SSN holder with reasonable certainty”. The only way they can say that is if they are admitting it is Obamas SSN – but then aren’t they breaking the law they say they are upholding ?
As far as the law is concerned they rely on Exemption 6. They quote “Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press” again. That case dealt with Exemption 7C [ criminal records], it gave some guidance in determining disclosure . However, that case dealt with releasing a detailed criminal record of the individual. The important distinction in that case was the release of the record included the name of the individual. Thus, it was found to be a “clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy”. You are not requesting the identity of the individual belonging to that number.
They ignore the case “Department of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U. S. 352 (1976).”, specifically from the ruling
“3. Exemption 6 does not create a blanket exemption for personnel files. With respect to such files and “similar files,” Congress enunciated a policy, to be judicially enforced, involving a balancing of public and private interests. Regardless of whether the documents whose disclosure is sought are in “personnel” or “similar” files, nondisclosure is not sanctioned unless there is a showing of a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, and redaction of documents to permit disclosure of nonexempt portions is appropriate under Exemption 6.”
Since redaction of the document is permitted per Department of the Air Force v. Rose,and you were not requesting the identity of the person to whom the number is assigned, there definitely is no showing of clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. The privacy interest of the owner of the number is not violated since the identity of the owner is unknown and is not being requested. They should have released the redacted record containing the zip code, gender, and date of application.
March 24th, 2011 @ 8:16 am
they know you have connected the dots and they don’t want to give you all the info because it will most likely cause embarrass their God O-bunghole.
March 24th, 2011 @ 8:17 am
I’m sorry….Cause embarrassment to
March 24th, 2011 @ 9:04 am
Libya revolt as it happened: Sunday: Minute-by-minute coverage of events after the United Nations approved a no-fly zone over Libya.
March 24th, 2011 @ 12:41 pm
With the zip code, gender, and date of application, the person could be identified, as long as there was only one person of each gender living at that zip code at that time. This is an obvious cover up of identity theft by the Social Security administration officials.
You can add Dawn S. Wiggins to the list of people aiding and abetting treason against the United States. I hope all of Obama’s accomplices get their well deserved punishment when this whole house of cards comes crashing down upon their heads.
March 25th, 2011 @ 6:52 am
How do you get a zip code number for the 1800s? They did not exist.
March 25th, 2011 @ 9:06 am
zip code at the time of the application, March 1977
did you have to work through the night and now half asleep??
June 3rd, 2012 @ 9:30 am
In the actually deep and in addition vast web you can find a number of internet experienced individuals. Yet it’s when I discover this site which i know There really is on-line platinum. Nonetheless, if We try to obtain the RSS Feed key I am baffled. Can simply anybody situation us by it? Thanks a lot.