Pro-Obama media twists the truth yet again
Posted on | March 27, 2010 | 2 Comments
this came out in the pro-Obama media:
“Apparently encouraged by all the attention she received after amending her Taitz v. Obama complaint earlier this week to whack the health-care reform bill (before it was even signed into law!), Orly Taitz, the Queen of the Birthers, has filed a motion to become the Queen of the Health-Care Lawsuits.
Yesterday, a D.C. court docketed the Laguna Niguel dentist’s motion asking to consolidate the much-publicized lawsuit of 13 state attorneys general against the health-care reform act with her own lawsuit, which was originally filed to challenge the president’s eligibility for office.”
Response:
No,I didn’t file my motion to consolidate, so the Queen of the birthers will be the Queen of the Health-Care Lawsuits. The reason is, that Washington DC has Quo Warranto statutes 16-3501. 16-3502, 16-3503 , whereby a federal official, in this case a President can be removed from office, and therefore a bill signed by him is not valid.
Let me give you another example. Obama recently signed an arms redaction treaty with Russia. Russians can state tomorrow or a year from now that they didn’t reduce arms and didn’t abide by this treaty, because it was signed by a president who was never qualified. Did you see lengthy eligibility interviews on Russia Today? Do you understand that US is undermined on all fronts, as long as Obama is in office?
Comments
2 Responses to “Pro-Obama media twists the truth yet again”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

March 27th, 2010 @ 11:59 am
Good Job Dr Orly Taitz !! It is good to see somebody , especially a brilliant Woman like you , standing up for the U.S. Constitution !! When you do win the Legal battles as well as The S.O.S. of Calif , America will be rebuilding
———————————————–
Legal definition of Natural born Citizen, this is the
U.S. Supreme court ruling late 1700’s early 1800’s and
Still is to this day “A child born on U.S. Soil to
Parents [meaning two (2)] not owing foreign
Allegiance to any other country “OBAMA does not
Qualify [his dad is from Kenya, Non U.S. Citizen], therefore he is not
Constitutionally the Legal President!!!
SOME CONSTITUTIONAL FACTS
(1) Obama is not a natural born Citizen, because of the fact of his Dad being a non U.S. Citizen therefore the most that ” OBAMA ” could be is a ” Native ” Citizen ” that would be The 14th amendment,[ the 14th amendment states any child born on U.S. soil is a Native Citizen of the United States regardless of the status of the parents , but not a Natural born Citizen ](Even if “OBAMA was born in Hawaii) OBAMA’S Legal status is seriously in question, then why would that not have standing in Federal court, because is the bill Legal?
I seen on the news ( #9 , I think ) Last night , that the Obama team is going to use a part of the U.S. Constitution that gives the President Executive Power over any State , So they say they will win with The ” U.S. Constitution ” Then I say bring on the Whole U.S. Constitution !! Let us examine the Eligibility part to see if “ OBAMA “ can prove he is Legally the President via The U.S. Constitution
——————————
March 28th, 2010 @ 6:31 am
The Birther issue is the most important (trump)issue. It renders all other issues “moot”.
Good job Orly, you really are my hero.