OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Which two conservative judges on the Supreme Court voted against de-certification in PA?

Posted on | December 9, 2020 | 7 Comments

SCOTUS decision in PA case

The first elections case reached SCOTUS. This was a de-certification of election case in PA. Stay of de-certification goes first to the judge who is responsible for the specific circuit, in this case Alito, who is supervising the third circuit.

Alito was interested in this case as he ordered late ballots to be sequestered and ordered a response from Pennsylvania. If a justice does not want to grant a stay, he would not request a response. Alito referred the case to the full court and the full court denied it. This means that at least two conservative justice voted with the liberal justices. One of them was probably Roberts, who is a known globalist puppet. I don’t know who was the second judge. I suspect Kavanaugh. Supreme Court did not reveal the breakdown, which judges voted for or against. The nation should know the answer to this question.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

7 Responses to “Which two conservative judges on the Supreme Court voted against de-certification in PA?”

  1. Terence Brennan
    December 9th, 2020 @ 2:45 am

    Maybe it isn’t as bad as it first seemed. I believe the Parnell/Kelly case was not dismissed, but simply denied immediate injunctive relief. The case is still alive on the Supreme Court docket for future action.

    This could be because SCOTUS has accepted the huge inclusive case by Texas suing all the swing states for all their actions running corrupt elections. Many other states are piling on to join that suit.

  2. Dan Stewart
    December 10th, 2020 @ 9:45 am

    SCOTUS needs to be treated just like the deep state swamp.

  3. speedie
    December 12th, 2020 @ 7:55 am

    The three judges President Trump put in threw him under the bus.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/three-trump-judges-threw-president-bus-texas-case-garbagety-uphold-constitution/

  4. Davey Crockett
    December 12th, 2020 @ 11:23 am

    I”m wondering why the subject was so rigid that the conservatives got involved with this idea in the first place!

  5. taino21
    December 13th, 2020 @ 10:21 am

    These people are a complete joke! If someone farts the Supreme Court will jump at the opportunity to determine if it’s constitutional. In this case they were not even asked to decide the election but to state that these states had violated their constitutions. If the states violated their state constitution they they are in disagreement with the Federal Constitution and they don’t think that merits a review? They stated that Texas had no standing? How did they come up with that one? Doesn’t every decision that Washington makes affect us all as a whole? Then why in hell did we formed a Union for? Too many judges like that little line of you have no standing, when we the taxpayers pay for their salaries. How in hell I have no standing when you are using my tax money? Can I ask for a freaking refund!

  6. Davey Crockett
    December 13th, 2020 @ 11:52 am

    Yeah, Speedie:

    That’s exactly the info I said to myself!

    I’d like to know why they didn’t give Trump the time of day, when he was associated with the same 3 that could’ve been time of the day so he would have the idea to be there when he was needed, by all those states!

    They didn’t give him a chance! Now, he won’t be able to get that number to be of help to end this damned nonsense!

    And we all thought that the young female was going to be of help to Trump! What a bitch! I’d like to know why she didn’t come through the line and make a chance for Trump, who gave her that opportunity!

    This is insane!

  7. Starlight
    December 13th, 2020 @ 8:18 pm

    Davey, my guessis that her children
    were threatened, in a subtle way,
    so that it did not appear threatening,
    but the underlying meaning was clear.

    Why else would someone that seemed
    intelligent and self-possessed,
    plus aloof from any hostility from
    the demoncrats, so betray the president
    who honored her so innocently????

Leave a Reply