Utah’s same-sex marriage ban back in court. I need people in CA, Utah and other states who want to sue in a class action Federal court system, federal judges, who overwrite the will of the people
Posted on | December 23, 2013 | 13 Comments
Press release
Law offices of Orly Taitz
A dangerous phenomenon of judges depriving millions of citizens of their civil and constitutional rights
Definition of marriage is a state issue. The state of Ca passed proposition 8, which states that marriage is a union between one man and one woman. If the people of the state were to decide differently, attorney Taitz would not be raising this issue, however today we have a situation were corrupt and obnoxious judges and officials substitute the rule of law with their own political views, which are often completely detached from the views of the majority of the population. these judges deny the citizens their 7th amendment right to have jury trials and rule based on their personal believes.
these judges are political appointees, majority of them came from a handful of Ivy League law schools that are populated by far left completely out to lunch professors, who brainwash their students and mold them into what we see today: tyrants, arrogant dictators, who flagrantly abuse their power.
We are seeing corrupt state Attorney generals, who like the Attorney General of California, Kamela Harris, selectively defend only state laws that they chose to defend, prosecute only violators that they chose to prosecute. In CA the citizens passed proposition 8, which defined a marriage as a union of one man and one woman. Our corrupt Attorney General Kamela Harris refued to defend the law in Federal court, when it was challenged. Later the supreme court ruled against the people of the state, because they claimed that the individuals do not have standing to defend the law and the Attorney general of the state, who get large campaign contributions from Gay and Lesbian activists, refused to defend the law. as such 40 million citizens of CA are treated as slaved with no voice by a corrupt Attorney general and corrupt Federal court system.
similarly, during the 2008 and 2012 elections the Secretary of State of CA Democrat Deborah Bowen and Attorney General of Ca (Jerry Brown in 2008 and in 2012 Kamela Harris, sister in law of Tony west, #2 in Obama Justice Department) chose not to apply article 2 of the US Constitution requirement to fellow Democrat Obama, who does not have one single valid ID to show his legitimacy for office or citizenship, but these corrupt state officials selectively applied the law against another candidate, Peta Lindsey stating that she is not Constitutionally eligible, because she does not satisfy Article 2 requirements, as she is not 35 years old and cannot be the US president.
We are seing corrupt federal judges making their own definition of marriage. For thousands of years marriage was defined as a union between one man and one woman, this what the people of CA,UT, CO and many other states decided. These obnoxious judges decided that they will disregard the definition which most citizens of the state find as the correct one and define the marriage as “anything goes”. today it is a gay marriage, tomorrow it will be polygamy: one man and 10 wives. 1 wife and 10 husbands or a marriage between a grown up man and a kid of 15 years old or 14 or 12.
Judges and other officials will state that they have immunity, however their immunity is not absolute. Violation of civil rights under the color of authority is not only illegal, it is a criminal offense under 42 USC 1983 and corresponding state statutes.
we as a society are allowed to place boundaries to judicial tyranny. We have right to sue corrupt judges and courts and sue them by a jury trial. the public is asked to weigh their opinion and write to this web site TaitzReportcom. If you want to be a part of a legal challenge, you can write to orly.taitz@hushmail.com
Comments
13 Responses to “Utah’s same-sex marriage ban back in court. I need people in CA, Utah and other states who want to sue in a class action Federal court system, federal judges, who overwrite the will of the people”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
December 23rd, 2013 @ 8:51 am
We are seeing the result of obama’s judicial appointments for which there is no recourse.
Make no mistake — eons of human history have been defiled in this country — not by the people but by judges and we will now forever live with the results.
Pandora’s box cannot ever be closed — only opened even further.
Pray for us!!!
December 23rd, 2013 @ 9:47 am
So if we pass a resolution that says Jews cannot be dentists or lawyers, judges cannot rule that it’s unconstitutional?
December 23rd, 2013 @ 9:59 am
no. The government cannot discriminate, however if you do not want to go to a Jewish dentist or a Jewish lawyer, this is your choice. A judge cannot force you to go to a Jewish Dentist
December 23rd, 2013 @ 10:59 am
What will stop brother and sister from marrying one another.
Or sister and sister or brother and brother from marrying one another.
How about an uncle and nephew or an aunt and niece..
This is not natural.
I think if we look at the grey line we will see we dont want to cross it..
An adult with someone their age..ok
An adult with someone 5 years junior…ok
An adult with someone 10 years junior …ok
An adult with someone 20 years junior.. ok
Is it ok if the the adult is 30 and the person is 20years old..
Is it ok if the adult is 30 and the person is 10 years old..
Is it ok if the adult is 30 and the person is 5 years old..
I think our tolerance as the age delta grows bigger shows their is a natural order of what is RIGHT and what is WRONG…
December 23rd, 2013 @ 12:26 pm
So, how is this judge’s decision forcing anyone to marry a gay person?
December 23rd, 2013 @ 12:32 pm
Yet the govt is discriminating by saying gays and lesbians cannot marry. No different from saying Jews cannot be dentists or lawyers.
December 23rd, 2013 @ 12:34 pm
Dec 18, 2013 7:25pm
Amid the floral floats, spirited marching bands, and high stepping equestrian units at next year’s Tournament of Roses Parade, a gay couple is set to marry,
On New Year’s Day, with tens of millions watching, the two grooms – Aubrey Loots, 42, and Danny Leclair, 45, of Los Angeles, will profess their love on a giant wedding cake shaped float – a first in the parade’s 125 year history.
“No sense of doing it small,” said Danny Leclair on the phone from his office in Los Angeles.
A play on the parade’s 2014 theme “Dreams Come True,” and sponsored by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, the float will celebrate same sex marriage and the role it can play in helping to reduce new HIV infections among gay men.
The Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year to strike down parts of the Defense of Marriage Act is what many gay couples like Leclair and Loot have been waiting for.
The two – together for 12 years – celebrated a commitment ceremony five years ago. The two hoped for something more.
The opportunity to get hitched presented itself in October when Leclair attended a same-sex wedding expo and applied for a chance of a lifetime – the chance to marry on top of the 2014 Roses Parade.
Leclair submitted an application and quickly fired off a text to his boyfriend with the picture of two grooms accompanied with the phrase “will you marry me.” Five weeks later the two were selected.
For a couple accustomed to living a spontaneous life, the unorthodox wedding announcement “didn’t surprise a lot of friends,” said Leclair laughing.
Shortly afterwards, the two were peppered with warm thoughts and well wishes from around the world on their Facebook page.
Leclair and Loots will be married by a minister as they pass down Colorado Avenue in Pasadena.
Leclair said he’s unsure what the two will wear, but promised their outfits will incorporate their own personal style.
And to make the ceremony more personal, Leclair said that he will read one of his favorite Nelson Mandela quotes in homage to the South African civil rights leader and his boyfriend who both are from South Africa.
Although California permits same sex marriage, there is no same-sex marriage in 34 states and the rights of gay couples are restricted in many part of the country.
“We are standing up to all that,” said Leclair who hoped the opportunity of tying the knot in front of a worldwide audience of about 80 million will expand the conversation on gay and lesbian rights. ”We are standing up on that cake so that we hope it will expand the conversation.”
Leclair added, “We’re responsible for changing people’s minds. We need to say whom we love without shame.”
https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/12/gay-couple-wins-lottery-to-marry-on-roses-parade-float/
December 23rd, 2013 @ 12:59 pm
no, they can marry. At issue is: what is marriage. In CA marriage is defined as a union between one man and one woman over age 18. They can marry as everyone else people of opposite sex or they can enter the civil union.
December 23rd, 2013 @ 1:08 pm
How is this any different than the law struck down by the Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia? The state defined marriage in that case too.
December 23rd, 2013 @ 1:32 pm
I must correct you, Dr. Taitz!
There is in reality no longer a definition in California of marriage being between one man and one woman.
The majority people of California were told they were not allowed to define marriage — only a gay judge had the right to define marriage in California — and for him it was open the door wide.
As a California resident, I would be proud to participate in a class action suit against judicial tyranny.
December 23rd, 2013 @ 1:36 pm
send me your info, name, contact info to orly.taitz@hushmail.com
December 23rd, 2013 @ 2:02 pm
In this class action lawsuit you will be able to distinguish the Loving case?
December 24th, 2013 @ 8:37 am
SCOTUS has already decided the issue. Your motions will be denied as the decision no longer made it a state decision as to whether or not members of the same sex can be married.
STOP IT!