Update, today 07.27.2013, counting the days of occupation of the U.S. White House
Posted on | July 27, 2013 | 13 Comments
27 days since Judge Lamberth started deliberating on Taitz v Astrue 11-cv-402 USDC District of Columbia, on a motion to release the SS-5, Social Security application to the Connecticut SSN 042-68-4425, which was issued to an immigrant from Russia Harry J. Bounel, and which was stolen by Obama and used by him in his 2009 tax returns.
145 days past since Indonesian-Kenyan con-artist with a stolen SSN and fabricated IDs, Barack Hussein Obama, closed the White House to the U.S. citizens, rightful owners of the White House.
1649 days since the U.S. White House has been occupied by the Indonesian-Kenyan charlatan with stolen and fabricated IDs, Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Soebarkah.
Comments
13 Responses to “Update, today 07.27.2013, counting the days of occupation of the U.S. White House”
Leave a Reply
July 27th, 2013 @ 8:36 am
REPOSTED on several sites, with over a million followers, asking them to contact the judge
July 27th, 2013 @ 8:39 am
REPOSTED on several sites, some sites have over a million followers, some over 3 million followers. Including Rand Paul’s site with over 4 million followers. I added this to the bottom: PLEASE consider contacting the Judge above to respond with the AMERICAN THING TO DO, and follow the LAW!
https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/dcd/lamberth
July 27th, 2013 @ 9:59 am
My common sense question is what is there to deliberate here?
July 27th, 2013 @ 10:22 am
nothing, the answer was supposed to be given
July 27th, 2013 @ 1:40 pm
Agreed. A judge listens to both sides then decides the dispute based on the evidence and arguments presented. Well, in this case one side decided not to show up and present an argument in opposition. The plaintiff’s argument is unopposed. There’s no decision to be deliberated upon. The worst judge in the world could figure this one out in two seconds. Rule in favor of the plaintiff….Dr. Taitz. Twenty-seven days? Give me a break! Hello, Judge Lamberth, where are you?
July 27th, 2013 @ 2:22 pm
Is he getting counsel regarding this decision?
July 27th, 2013 @ 4:01 pm
Uh OH! Birther movement in Venezuala from Drudge report. Moldura born in columbia!
https://us.cnn.com/2013/07/27/world/americas/venezuela-birther-movement/index.html?hpt=hp_t3
July 27th, 2013 @ 7:01 pm
The judge is probably deliberating between his loyalty to his oath of office and his country and the value of the Swiss bank account that’s been set up for him if he just makes this go away…
July 27th, 2013 @ 9:20 pm
Ron, Lamberth holds no loyalty to our country. He proved that long ago and his only oath is in protecting Soebarkah. This criminal in a black robe finds himself in a rather precarious position this time around. Dr Taitz has the rat cornered and he knows it. He can’t just come out and attack her like he’s done in the past. She closed in on him and trapped him. Why don’t you enlighten us by telling us what it is he is going to come up with to just “make it all go away?”
July 27th, 2013 @ 9:36 pm
We’ve seen Eric Holder’s injustice department blatantly ignore other judge’s rulings because they are the ones with the guns. If Lamberth ruled against Obama, what would change?
July 27th, 2013 @ 11:28 pm
there will be a lot of noise, which will be impossible to ignore
July 28th, 2013 @ 11:03 am
Dr. Taitz
Has the judiciary Committee been contacted about this and if so what has their response been?
July 28th, 2013 @ 6:51 pm
u r the BEST!!