Redacted FOIA Taitz v Ruemmler (White House counsel) was submitted to the US District Court for the district of Columbia
Posted on | July 30, 2011 | 20 Comments
DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ
ATTORNEY PRO SE
29839 SANTA MARGARITA PARKWAY, STE 100
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA 92688
TEL: (949) 683-5411; FAX (949) 766-7603
E-MAIL: ORLY.TAITZ@GMAIL.COM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Plaintiff, § Freedom of information violation
§ 5USC §552
v. § CASE #
§
KATHY RUEMMLER in her capacity §
as the White House counsel §
and custodian of records §
§
§ oral argument requested
COMPLAINT
JURISDICTION
Current complaint is filed under Federal statute 5U.S.C. 552 Freedom of Information Act and diversity
PARTIES
Plaintiff, Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, President of “Defend our Freedoms Foundation”, resident of California
Defendant, Kathy Ruemmler, in her official capacity as the White House Counsel, with business address in Washington DC
ALLEGATIONS
1. For a period of nearly three years Mr. Obama has kept hidden his long form birth certificate, attesting to his Natural Born status, which is a requirement for one to become the U.S. President based on Article 2, section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.
2. Plaintiff herein, Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ,(hereinafter “Taitz”) is an attorney, who is a counsel in a legal action Barnett, Keyes, et al v Obama 8:09 cv 00082 USDC CD CA, and 10-55084 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, dealing with Mr. Obama’s lack of the Natural Born status.
3. On MAY 2, 2011, Plaintiff was scheduled to conduct an oral argument in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama on the issue of Obama’s lack of eligibility.
4. On April 27. 2011, only a few days prior to an oral argument, and with polls showing 2/3 of the American public doubting his birth place and legitimacy, Mr. Obama released, what he alleged to be a true and correct copy of his original long form birth certificate maintained in the vault of the Health Department of Hawaii.
5. On the same day Mr. Obama, together with former White House counsel, Robert Bauer, conducted a press conference, attesting to the legitimacy of his birth certificate and attacking political dissident leaders and civil rights attorneys questioning his eligibility, by calling them “sideshow and carnival barkers”.
6. Mr. Obama and Mr. Bauer alleged, that Mr. Obama’s attorney Judith Curley travelled to Hawaii, received 2(two) separate certified copies of the original birth certificate, contained on file in the state department in Hawaii and delivered these two documents to the White House.
7. Mr. Obama and Mr. Bauer conducted a press conference and provided a white background copy of the document and made it available to the NBC reporter Savannah Guthrie and other reporters.
8. Another copy on secure green paper was posted on the official web site for the WhiteHouse.gov.
9. Within a short period of time multiple experts rendered an opinion, that the document posted on the White House.gov is not a true and correct copy of a 1961 original birth certificate, but a cheap forgery, a computer generated “document”, created by cutting and pasting parts of different documents.
10. Printing and typesetting expert Paul Irey provided an affidavit (Exhibit 1), stating, that the document in question is clearly a forgery and contains letters and numbers from different type settings, which can be seen only in a forged document.
11. Adobe expert Chito Papa provided an affidavit, showing, that parts of the document were created in Adobe computer program in layers. (Exhibit 2)
12. Scanning and printing machines expert Douglas Vogt has provided an affidavit, showing kerning, different typesetting, different color, digital, color and grayscale intertwined imaging and other signs of forgery. (Exhibit 3)
13. At the same time Taitz, Plaintiff herein, obtained verification from the Selective Service, that Obama is using a Connecticut Social security number xxx-xx-4425, while Obama was never a resident of Connecticut (Exhibit 4, redacted selective Service certification of Barack Obama) (Exhibit 5, unredacted Selective Service certificate of Barack Obama submitted under seal)
14. Social Security Verification systems provided a response, that the Social Security number in question xxx-xx-4425 was never issued to Barack Obama, which show that Obama is fraudulently using a social security number, which was never issued to him. This represents additional evidence pointing to lack of a valid birth certificate, as typically individuals without a valid birth certificate have to resort to using invalid and fraudulently obtained social security numbers.(Exhibit 6 redacted Social Security Verification Systems letter ) (Exhibit 7, unredacted Social Security verification letter submitted under seal)
15. Taitz obtained from the Student Clearing house an official record of Obama’s attendance at the Columbia university, which shows him attending that university only for 9 (nine) month in contrast to Obama’s assertions, which points to the general pattern of fraud in relation to Obama’s vital records. (Exhibit 8 Student Clearing house certification of attendance of Columbia University by Obama for only 9 months.)
16. On June 1, 2011 USDC for the District of Columbia issued an order for the parties to file dispositive pleadings in Taitz v Astrue 11-cv-402 RCL, a case, where the same Plaintiff is seeking an original SS-5 application for Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which Mr. Obama is using according to his Selective Service certificate, but which was never assigned to him according to the Social Security administration (Exhibits 4, 5). This order was held by the clerks of the court and not posted on the electronic docket until June 3, 2011.
17. On June 2, 2011, as the above order was issued, but not docketed yet, the
White House counsel , Robert Bauer resigned and a new White House counsel, Kathy Ruemmler was appointed.
8. Next day, on June 3rd, Taitz forwarded to Ms. Ruemmler request for inspection of the two “certified copies” of the original long form birth certificate for Mr. Obama, which allegedly were hand carried to the White House by Perkins Coie attorney, Ms. Judith Corley and provided to the public and reporters by the former White House counsel, another Perkins Coie attorney, Mr. Robert Bauer. Taitz requested inspection of those allegedly “certified copies”, that are now in Ruemmler’s custody.
9. Ruemmler did not respond.
10. Taitz forwarded to Ruemmler a second request under 5 USC 552 Freedom of Information act.
11.Ruemmler did not respond.
12. In light of lack of response, overwhelming evidence of forgery and general campaign of cover up and stone walling, further requests are futile.
13. FOIA provides disclosure of the public documents held by the agencies of the federal government.
14. 5 USC 552 (6) private records exception does not apply in this case, as Barack Obama already made the document in question public by posting it on WhiteHouse.gov. At this point privacy is no longer at issue. The only issue is forgery, which can be ascertained by the inspection of the hard copies of the document.
15. Public interest in ascertaining, whether the person occupying the position of the U.S. President, is doing so based on a forged U.S. birth certificate, outweighs any possible privacy concerns. Multi Ag, 515 F.3d at 1229-30; see, e.g., Barnard v. DHS, 598 F. Supp. 2d 1, 11 (D.D.C. 2009); Schoenman v. FBI, 576 F. Supp. 2d 3, 9 (D.D.C. 2008); Unidad Latina En Accion v. DHS, 253 F.R.D. 44, 48 (D. Conn. 2008); Schoenman v. FBI, 573 F. Supp. 2d 119, 148 (D.D.C. 2008); Schoenman v. FBI, 575 F. Supp. 2d 136, 160 (D.D.C. 2008). as the D.C. Circuit has held, “a privacy interest may be substantial — more than de minimis — and yet be insufficient to overcome the public interest in disclosure.”
16. While 5 USC 552 excludes “central offices of the White House”, this exclusion will not apply in this case, as term “central offices of the White House” relates to the documentation obtained and generated by the President as part of his duties. A copy of a birth certificate from 1961, 50 years ago, does not relate to the duties of the President, which commenced only two and a half years ago, this document relates to legitimacy of Mr. Obama and his right to be in those “central offices of the White House” in the first place. If he was never eligible to be there in the first place, he is not eligible to claim the privilege.
17. This is the case of first impression, as there was never a case in the U.S. history, when a person occupying the position of the U.S. President, did so, while using a forged birth certificate and attempting to defraud the public by posting on line, on White House.gov, an alleged computer generated, forged birth certificate.
18. The closest case in the U.S. history is United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) , which originated in the DC court, when Hon. John Sirica granted the motion to compel subpoena by Leon Jaworski. Judge Sirica’s decision was confirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States. Just as the Watergate tapes showed high probability of the criminal wrongdoing, which later indeed led to multiple criminal convictions, there is a high probability of criminal wrongdoing by Mr. Obama, former White House counsel Robert Bauer, Mr. Obama’s personal attorney Judith Corley of Perkins Coie, State Registrar, Hawaii Department of Health Alvin T. Onaka and a number of other individuals. Such wrongdoing can be shown by examining hard copies of the alleged long form 1961 birth certificate of Mr. Obama, posted by Mr. Obama on the official White House website WhiteHouse.gov.
Wherefore Plaintiff respectfully requests this court to
1. Order the defendant to provide the plaintiff access for inspection of the two certified copies of the original long form birth certificate of Barack Obama, which are currently in possession of the White House counsel Mr. Kathy Ruemmler
2. Attorneys fees incurred by the Plaintiff, as counsel for the “Defend Our Freedoms Foundation” in attempting to obtain such documents under 5USC 552 FOIA
3. In light of the overwhelming public interest Plaintiff requests expedient processing of this complaint, as well as open court oral argument.
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
ph 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
Comments
20 Responses to “Redacted FOIA Taitz v Ruemmler (White House counsel) was submitted to the US District Court for the district of Columbia”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
July 30th, 2011 @ 3:54 pm
Hi Lady Liberty, As a constitutional attorney, what’s the story with Obama being able to raise the debt ceiling via the 14th Amendment? I mean legally, constitutionally. Keep up the great work!!
July 30th, 2011 @ 3:59 pm
Orly, you are amazing, and the “Truth will set us all Free” Not to much longer!!!!! God Bless you, I hope to meet you someday….Thank you for all you have done for the citizens of this Country…Leslie
July 30th, 2011 @ 5:01 pm
14 th Amendment states that the existing debt needs to be honored, it does not give the President a right to raise the debt ceiling indefinitely and incur more debt, that would turn this nation into a dictatorship
July 30th, 2011 @ 5:15 pm
As Dirty Harry famously said, “Make my Day!”. Tim Scott of Sout Caerolina already said he would call for immediate impeachment of the POTUS if he tried to unilaterally circumvent the Congress on the debt limit.
July 30th, 2011 @ 6:42 pm
Hi again Lady Liberty and sincere thank you for your answer. My question was cut off… what I was getting to was, since Obama is not really the President, if he uses 14th Amendment what will happen? It’s hard to understand all what’s going on, but I think you said judges appointed by Obama and Obamacare and all that is null and void. If all government spending is done by 14th Amendment, when you are successful in Hawaii and with great response from DC court judge Lambot, what happens to all the spending? Thank you again.
July 30th, 2011 @ 7:10 pm
I don’t want to make too many predictions. I don’t believe, that everything will be undone. I am sure some laws and executive orders will stand under the doctrine of the apparent authority. We are in uncharted waters and there are a lot of variables.
At any rate, even if we can’t redo the past, looking forward a lot can be done
July 30th, 2011 @ 7:29 pm
Still impressed with your amazing tenacity after all this time. Patiently awaiting next step in the DC court re: SSAN, as well as seeing how events unfold 8 Aug.
Saw your posting about your migraine. I can empathize as I sometimes experience what are called ‘silent’ migraines – no real pain but it impacts my vision. Might be episode-free for a couple years then have three or four episodes in a month; very slight throbbing in the head accompanied by what seems like tunnel vision and circular/semi-circular flashing/sparkling ‘lights’ in the remaining vision; annoying when reading or on the computer … terrifying when driving the car.
Found the energizer bunny passed out alongside the road. When he came to he explained he’s been trying to keep up with your pace. I think he’s setting his sights on an easier target: academia — they don’t do anything there.
July 30th, 2011 @ 8:40 pm
A number of law professors disagree with you about the 14th Amendment. What makes you believe that your interpretation is correct?
July 30th, 2011 @ 10:29 pm
Michele Bachmann says she will impeach in a minute if Obama tries to use the 14th. Congress decides when the 14th is resorted to, not the executive.
July 30th, 2011 @ 10:44 pm
Let’s have a public debate on the Constitution
July 30th, 2011 @ 10:47 pm
thanks, pretty funny about the energizer bunny
July 31st, 2011 @ 12:38 am
which are currently in possession of the White House counsel Mr. Kathy Ruemmler
Dr.Taitz, I think this should read Mrs., not Mr. in your complaint.
Keep up the good work.
July 31st, 2011 @ 4:34 am
Julie
July 30th, 2011 @ 8:40 pm
————————————-
Are those the same professors that accept that the spawn of a foreign father (not even a US citizen) to be USPOTUS?
Are yhose the same professors who look the other way on private property rights as Obama steals billions of dollars from Chrysler bond holders and gives them to unions so that they now control the auto company?
Time for you to find some other professors for mentioring. Hillsdale College might be a good start for you.
July 31st, 2011 @ 4:55 am
Professor Jack Balkin of Yale University and Professor Lawrence Tribe of Harvard University said they will debate you on the Fourteenth Amendment.
July 31st, 2011 @ 5:20 am
it was a typo
July 31st, 2011 @ 9:32 am
Julie,
How do you know Lawrence Tribe? Who do you work for and what are your crecentials? Are you a paid operative for the regime? Why are you lurking in the shadows (typical for snivelling ritualistic left-wing ideologues) why don’t you just identify yourself and let your arguments succeed or fail on their own merits? What are you hiding? Who do you report to?
Thayne Doak
July 31st, 2011 @ 9:43 am
I want to debate you.
July 31st, 2011 @ 9:53 am
who are you?
July 31st, 2011 @ 10:03 am
14th Amendment “4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law,… shall not be questioned.”
Ok, so our debt is valid. So what?
The debt limit currently authorized by law is all the debt the United States is allowed to incur, and no more. The US has an authorized credit card limit and we’ve reached that limit. No more borrowing is allowed, and neither Obama, nor anyone else, is allowed to walk away from the debt. So, what this means, is that there is no legal possibility of default. Obama must continue to use revenues to service the debt. Obama and the mass media need to stop scaring people about a possible default on the debt. That is not a choice available to Obama.
“Authorized by Law” means authorized by the Congress. Obama cannot unilaterally make new debt obligations on behalf of the United States.
July 31st, 2011 @ 10:17 am
The Obama administration is withholding access to documents that they made a big deal out of making public at a nationwide media event. How can they explain such bizarre behavior? Anyone with half a brain can see something wrong with this scenario.
I am saddened by the number of Americans who see the obvious fraud going on, but don’t care because they want to promote an Obama style government that shovels expensive benefits their way. They just don’t believe that this will result in disaster by the destruction of our heretofore innovative, efficient, and productive economy. We will all suffer greatly if the sober, clear thinking people lose this battle.
Thank you, Dr. Taitz, for your superhuman efforts to crack-open this issue. I really hope, for all of our sakes, that your efforts are successful.