Newsletter 01.19.10.
Posted on | June 20, 2010 | 11 Comments
Today Jeff Sessions of Alabama appeared on FOX and talked about a necessity to postpone Elena Kagan’s confirmation hearings due to the fact that Clinton’s and Obama’s attorneys are stalling release of some 1600 documents (no kidding, obfuscation of records-impossible).
I need your help in getting in touch with your senators and bringing forward the fact that as Solicitor General Elena Kagan got from me information about the fact that Barack Hussein Obama is using multiple social security numbers of the deceased as well as numbers never assigned, yet she covered it up. Keep in mind that she is not Obama’s private attorney, she is a solicitor general, acting as a number one advocate, for us, citizens of the United States of America, yet she has chosen to aid and abet in defrauding us. I never testified before any committees or hearings, but this is extremely important. I need a few people to help me research the procedure, how do I sign up as a person testifying to material facts in relation to this nomination. Please, help me get in touch with as many senators as possible. Ones, that might be willing to bring this issue, might be senators Sessions and Shelby from AL, Inhofe and Coburn of OK, Cornyn and Hutchinson from TX, Johanns from NE, Ensign from NV, Thune from SD, Grassley from IA, Vitter from LA and DeMint from SC. We have to bring this issue to forefront. If you can help, please call me at 949-683-5411
Another burning issue (literary) is the environmental calamity in the gulf. I can’t even watch the footage of this wall of oil gushing into the gulf. It is not a spill, 100,000 barrels of oil per day is an environmental holocaust. I was following the response of different governmental officials. The most effective is Governor Jindel of LA. He was the first one to place barriers, he dispatched 16 barges, that were separating oil and cleaning the gulf, while Obama was appearing at fund raisers, vacationing in IL and playing golf. At best, both BP and Feds were inefficient and impotent in stopping this environmental disaster. I believe the best solution, is for governor Jindel to assume and exercise his executive powers of eminent domain, take over the rig, employ different techniques that were reportedly suggested by a number of oil and gas engineers, but not implemented, and stop the destruction of our environment and food supply. He, also, needs to put a lien on that 20 billion settlement. Jindel is known as a prudent and effective governor with lowest unemployment and lowest deficits in the Nation. Obama showed himself completely irresponsible, incurring 1.5 trillion dollars worth of deficit in one year, four times more than Bush. He cannot be trusted with money, not anywhere near money, not in a 5 miles radius of any money. Please, call governor Jindel and ask him to assume his emergency powers of eminent domain and take over the oversight of stopping this environmental holocaust.
Lastly, in regards to legal challenges to AZ anti illegal immigration law. First of all, none of the groups or even Feds have any standing to challenge it: using their own language, they have no standing, there was no damage to anyone and any claims of damages are conjectural and hypothetical and the cases need to be dismissed as frivolous. Az simply put in its statutes Federal law, it is identical in language to Federal law. Ca has a similar law on the books for years. The difference is that Arnie is strong in talk only, while Jan Brewer will walk the walk.
A couple of Obama supporters have written to me that I am wrong in advising Gov Brewer to request for all issues of fact and law to be decided by the jury. They claim that in a legal dictionary it says that issues of law need to be decided by the judge only. It reminds of an Orwellian animal farm. Do you remember how the pigs changed the laws over night. At first all animals were equal later on a new rule appeared on the wall, that pigs were more equal than others. Similarly, if you look in the Constitution, 7 amendment guarantees us jury trial, it does not state only on the matters of fact. The judge can provide the jury with the law, but the jury can decide, whether certain statute violated the law. I remember there was a famous case where a judge was nearly impeached, because he gave the jury an improper instruction, namely that only the matters of fact can be decided by the jury. Let’s go back to sanity. It is clear as day and night that Federal judge is totally dependant on his ultimate boss, the president and the federal government, there is a clear bias in favor of the Federal government, therefore gov. Brewer needs to demand a jury trial in AZ and not be at the mercy of one Federal judge.
Comments
11 Responses to “Newsletter 01.19.10.”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
June 20th, 2010 @ 5:49 pm
“It is clear as day and night that Federal judge is totally dependant on his ultimate boss, the president and the federal government, there is a clear bias in favor of the Federal government, therefore gov. Brewer needs to demand a jury trial in AZ and not be at the mercy of one Federal judge.”
I don’t think you’ve thought this one through very well. If they did it your way, the judge being used would be totally subservient to Brewer as the governor. Wouldn’t that be just as biased and unfair?
Also, the federal government is involved in actions at the federal court level at all times and in many jurisdictions and venues. For example, every federal crime is prosecuted in federal courts before federal judges. Are these all illegitimate too? Remember that federal courts are established by the constitution…
June 20th, 2010 @ 6:43 pm
WalpinGate!!…judge richard roberts graduated columbia 1978…was an associate of covington/burling where eric holder is/was a partner…obama also visited covington/burling..
https://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2008/07/obama-visits-co.html
June 20th, 2010 @ 8:37 pm
if those judges were to follow the Constitution, we would not have gotten a Kenyan communist usurper sitting in the White House without a valid Social Security number of his own
June 21st, 2010 @ 2:06 am
Pay to play… Kagan is getting paid off to hide truth about Obama’s many frauds, including his social security number that was issued in Conn. where he never lived to a man born in 1890..I’ll send it to Feinstein, but it will never get through her progressive underlings running her office. even if it did she would never do the right thing.
June 21st, 2010 @ 3:05 am
“I never testified before any committees or hearings, but this is extremely important.”
NOT
GONNA
HAPPEN.
EVER
June 21st, 2010 @ 3:21 am
You do not get a jury trial for just anything. For example, the Seventh Amendment states: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”
1. A case challenging a federal law is not a “suit at common law.” For example, Age Discrimination cases against the federal government are not “common law” so there is no guarenteed jury trial. There is a jury trial for Title VII cases, however, because the statute explicitly provides for one.
2. The 7th Amendment has never been incorporated against the States. See Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U.S. 211 (1916).
3. Summary Judgment – there would be no summary judgment if juries got to decide laws and facts. The whole point of Rule 56 is that if the facts are not in dispute, a judge makes a decision because there is no need for a trial of fact.
June 21st, 2010 @ 5:42 am
1. Legal chqallenges to AZ constitute the matters of fact. Are there any facts, is there any evidence of discrimination under Az law? Jury can decide.
2. There is nothing in the Constitution or rule 56 preventing Gov Jan Brewer from demanding jury trial.
3. I believe that she should file a counter claim against the Federal Government: specifically INS-ICE, border patrol and Obama for negligence, harassment, intimidation, list goes on and on (you got my drift) and seek damages and demand jury trial
June 21st, 2010 @ 7:02 am
Dr. Taitz:
You have one major problem. All of the allegations you think Brewer should raise are torts. To file a tort claim against any part of the executive branch you need to go through the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”).
Under the FTCA, there is no right to a jury trial. Because the FTCA is a federal law, any federal party can be removed to federal court.
June 21st, 2010 @ 8:49 am
I hope Kagen will be delayed until after the Conservatives/Republicans take over the House and/or the Senate. We need to shut down Obama and start demanding, with leverage, that judges begin looking at the cases involving the birth certificate and SS numbers.
June 22nd, 2010 @ 8:31 am
Any case challenging the Arizona laws are challenging its constitutionality. Questions of constitutionality are questions of law. Additionally, these suits seek permanent injunctions, which of course, are decided by judges and not juries.
That being said, any challenge that is purely Arizona state law could be heard in state courts without a chance for removal, and whatever the jury rules in Arizona would apply. Any challenge under the federal constitution – federal court only.
June 22nd, 2010 @ 10:31 am
there is no absolutely no impediment to request for jury trial in Fed court, requesting for jury to decide if the plaintiffs have suffered any injury and have any standing to sue under AZ law. Federal government have suffered no injury and has no standing to sue AZ. Their law suit is totally frivolous