12 Responses to “Farrar corrected proposed summary of law and fact”

1. Tim
   February 2nd, 2012 @ 12:25 am

   Hello Orly,

   I had a quick read of this pdf that you have provided.

   In your pdf, at one time you write “grandfather” instead of grant further. If you use Adobe Reader, use the search tool (find text) to find this grandfather word in your pdf file. It is on page 5.

   Second, that would have been better if you had page numbers for this pdf document. I can’t see any.

   Finally, I do not know what you use to create your pdf files but, if you do not mind, here are a few suggestions. I hope you will not take these suggestions badly.
   You could create your text in Microsoft Word 2010 and, if you have Adobe Acrobat X Pro installed on your computer, it automatically put an add-in in Microsoft Word that allows you to create a pdf document from a Microsoft Word 2010 document. You can also do that by starting Adobe Acrobat X Pro and convert any Word document into pdf.
   The advantages of using Microsoft Word 2010 to write your text is that you can use various tools: word count, add page numbers, spell-checking, etc. and they will be all present (automatically converted) once you convert the Microsoft Word document into a pdf file.

   Waiting the judge’s decision!! That should surely wake up the media!!

   All the best, Orly. Thanks for fighting to protect the Constitution of the USA.

2. orly taitz
   February 2nd, 2012 @ 3:42 am

   no, I was right. You do not understand the meaning. It related to “grandfather” clause, which allowed first Presidents, who were not natural born citizens to take office. It is “grandfather”, not grant further, as you say. I do have all those programs

3. RacerJim
   February 2nd, 2012 @ 7:34 am

   Good morning Orly,

   Just thought I’d let you that in my humble opinion your “FARRAR CORRECTED PROPOSED SUMMARY OF LAW AND FACT” outshines, in scope and substance, those of Van Irion and Mark Hatfield.

4. Pat
   February 2nd, 2012 @ 11:25 am

   Hi Orly,

   I read your latest submission. Very impressive recap and indictment.

   Can’t wait to see how the Judge rules.

   Great job!

   I can understand how terribly difficult this must be considering the adverse publicity and character defamation you are subjected to by the “controlled media”.

   Unfortunately, the real “rulers” are in control of not only the media, but the central bank and have bribed away our government.

   You are up against a “vast monolithic conspiracy” (as JFK noted shortly before he was murdered).

   Best of luck.

   Regards

5. TomA
   February 2nd, 2012 @ 6:15 pm

   Just a quick question. Does the pattern of fraudulent behavior extend to the fact that 49 of 50 Democrat State Committees have not certified the eligibility of Barack Obama? This was an unprecedented occurrence, and surely they must have had doubts about his eligibility or they would have automatically issued the appropriate certification documents. If true, then this would seem to be a RICO-type criminal conspiracy, and as such could place dozens of persons in legal jeopardy.

6. The Truth
   February 2nd, 2012 @ 6:52 pm

   Orly, on page 13 in #1, you say the Nordyke twins were born three days after Obama, then in #3, you say
   they were born within 24 hours.

   Also on page 18 you made a mistake where you mention Obama attending Columbia in September 1982. The second mention of September 1982 should read “September 1981”.

   Beside the small errors, you did a brilliant job! Congratulations! We are all looking forward to the decision!

7. JEAN MACALLISTER
   February 2nd, 2012 @ 7:49 pm

   The box on the right side of your page for re-subscribing to your mailing list does not work. I input my address, clicked on subscribe, and the next page was completely blank.
   Have you considered using Paypal for donations?
   Many people use it for Ebay, etc, because their credit card numbers go only to Paypal.
   Keep up the good work. What, if anything, happened today, Feb. 2?

8. Jim Black
   February 2nd, 2012 @ 10:06 pm

   I spoke with an attorney at the Illinois State Board of Elections, which over ruled Benjamin Freeman’s understanding of natural born citizen. I asked him if he knew of a SCOTUS case that either amended or over turned the commonly accepted legal definition of natural born citizen as set forth in several supreme court cases, John Bingham, David Ramsey, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, etc. He could not think of any and would have to research it. Yeah, right.

9. kelley
   February 3rd, 2012 @ 12:58 am

   Orly, it’s 2 am and I can’t sleep, My boyfriend and I watched the PP Simmons video earlier about how 8 atttemps by democrats (one by republican Don Nichols) since 2003 when Obama was climbing the political ladder, their attempts to change the definition of Natural Born Citizen. One attempt was by Clare MCCaskin, another attempt by Mr. Conyers, one was co-signed by Hillary and Obama himself. Then I got to thinking about the day he took his oath of office and wondered if he had a re-do because he stated his name was obama when it was Barry Soetoero instead and that’s why Justice Roberts redid it when no one was able to watch on television the second oath. On the Simmons video it reminds us of the meeting he had the night before he took office with the entire supreme court (except Alito,- no one knew where he was) and it was not only a top secret meeting with no press allowed but illegal as well. this man is GUILTY of treason, and HE KNOWS IT!!!!! Orly is getting close to exposing this rotten &^%%^& and he knows it. It’s only a matter of time before he does something to stop you. He can’t allow the truth to come out so who knows what he will do but he will do something. I’m sure the judge Mahili was met with Obama’s people telling them what would happen if this were exposed and the fall out that would occur and if t he judge rules against you Orly, it’s only because he was “gotten to” because unless you have no brain, you know Obama has pulled the wool over everyone’s eyes for years and he is in this so deep that he will bribe any judge or do whatever he needs to do. (Threats, who knows what.) But I absolutely guarantee you, if this judge rules to put Obama on the ballot he has been bribed or threatened. It’s Friday so I am sure he will rule today since he didn’t yesterday.

10. orly taitz
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:47 am

    yes, you are right.

11. orly taitz
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:48 am

    paypal is right there, on the top of the page

12. Joey Dockendorff
    February 4th, 2012 @ 2:41 am

    Something’s not right. To take this long on such a clear cut decision “Smells”

Leave a Reply